11 research outputs found
Postoperative infection following strabismus surgery: case series and increased incidence in a single large referral center
Purpose
To identify and analyze cases of postoperative infection following strabismus surgery at a large referral center and to report the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.
Methods
An electronic database search identified strabismus procedures at Duke Eye Center from July 1996 to October 2017. Diagnosis codes for periocular infections were used to further identify patients with possible infections following strabismus surgery.
Results
Of 9,111 strabismus surgeries, 13 (0.14%) met criteria for probable infection, all occurring since October 2012 (0/6580 before vs 13/2531 [0.51%] after; P < 0.0001). Mean age of infection cases was 11.4 years; 11 patients (85%) were under 18 years of age. Associated previous diagnoses were genetic abnormalities with associated developmental delay (n = 5 [38%]), previous skin or ear infection (n = 4 [31%]), and acute or chronic rhinitis (n = 3 [23%]). Infection site cultures revealed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3 [23%]), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (n = 3 [23%]), and Streptococcus pyogenes/group-A Streptococcus (n = 2 [15%]). Only 1 case had bilateral infection. Infection remained extraocular in all cases, but one eye lost light perception secondary to optic atrophy. No common surgeon/procedure/preparation-related risks were identified.
Conclusions
A unifying explanation for the increase in post–strabismus surgery infections at Duke Eye Center was not identified. Potential risk factors include age <18 years, developmental delay, immune compromise, preceding nonocular infection, and bacterial colonization
Recommended from our members
The flipped-classroom approach to teaching horizontal strabismus in ophthalmology residency: a pilot study
PurposeTo compare the flipped classroom (home pre-taped lectures followed by in-class group exercise) to the traditional classroom (home reading assignment followed by in-class lecture) for horizontal strabismus didactics in ophthalmology residency.MethodsAll PGY2-4 residents from four U.S. ophthalmology residencies without prior residency flipped-classroom experience were invited to esotropia and exotropia sessions sequentially, with random order and assignment to flipped and traditional classrooms. Content test scores before and after the two classrooms were compared. Surveys were administered to assess participant experience.ResultsA total of 40 residents attended each session. Likert scale evaluation of preparatory material and classroom activity did not differ between sessions; however, divided by year of training, 70% of senior residents (PGY3-4) and 39% of first-year (PGY2) residents preferred the flipped classroom over the traditional classroom. Pre- and post-test scores for the flipped classroom exceeded those of the traditional classroom for the exotropia course (P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, resp.) but not for the esotropia course. There was significant improvement between pre- and post-tests for both styles of learning.ConclusionsThe flipped classroom had a favorable effect on test scores for only one of the two strabismus subjects but was preferred over the traditional classroom among PGY3-4 residents
Improvement in health-related quality of life following strabismus surgery for children with intermittent exotropia
A total of 197 children with IXT aged 3-11 years (and 1 parent of each child) were enrolled in a previously reported randomized clinical trial comparing two surgical procedures. The Intermittent Exotropia Questionnaire (IXTQ) was administered before surgery (baseline), and again at 6 and 36 months following surgery. The child version of the IXTQ was only completed by children 5-11 years of age (n = 123). Outcomes were classified as "resolved" (exodeviation of <10Δ, no decreased stereoacuity, and no other nonsurgical treatment for IXT or reoperation), "suboptimal" (exotropia ≥10Δ by simultaneous prism and cover test or constant esotropia ≥6Δ or loss of ≥2 octaves of stereoacuity), or "intermediate." Mean changes in Rasch-calibrated IXTQ domain scores (Child, Proxy, Parent-psychosocial, Parent-function, and Parent-surgery; converted to a 0-100 scale) were compared.12 month embargo; published: 24 April 2021This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]
Health-related quality of life in children with untreated intermittent exotropia and their parents
Purpose: To determine whether health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores improved or worsened over 3 years of observation in childhood intermittent exotropia without treatment. Methods: A total of 111 children aged 3-11 years with intermittent exotropia were assigned to observation in a previously reported randomized trial comparing patching with observation. The intermittent exotropia questionnaire (IXTQ) was administered at baseline, 6 months, and 36 months. Rasch-calibrated IXTQ domain scores (Child, Proxy, Parent-psychosocial, Parent-function, and Parent-surgery) were compared between time points. The Child IXTQ was administered only to children ≥5 years of age (n = 78). Results: Overall, Child IXTQ and Proxy IXTQ scores showed no significant change over 36 months (mean improvement from baseline to 36 months of 3.2 points [95% CI, −1.9 to 8.2] and −2.4 points [95% CI: −7.9 to 3.1], resp.). By contrast, Parent-psychosocial, Parent-function, and Parent-surgery domain scores all improved over 36 months (mean improvements of 12.8 points [95% CI, 5.9-19.6] and 14.2 points [95% CI, 8.0-20.3] and 18.5 points [95% CI, 9.7-27.3], resp.). Conclusions: HRQOL of children with intermittent exotropia remains stable with observation over 3 years (by both child and proxy report), whereas parental HRQOL improves.12 month embargo; available online 8 March 2021This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]