Arterial stiffness, hypertension, and rational use of nebivolol

Arterial stiffness plays a key role in the pathophysiology of the cardiovascular system. Some indices of arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, characteristics of central blood pressure waveform) may be presently calculated and evaluated in the clinical setting. Age and blood pressure are the two major clinical determinants of increased arterial stiffness, while molecular determinants of arterial stiffness are related to fibrotic components of the extracellular matrix, mainly elastin, collagen and fibronectin. Increased arterial stiffness has been consistently observed in conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes. Arterial stiffness evaluated by means of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity yielded prognostic significance beyond and above traditional risk factors. A more favorable effect of calcium channel blockers, diuretics and ACE inhibitors compared with β-blockers on indices of arterial stiffness was observed in several studies. It is conceivable that newer β-blockers with additional vasodilating properties, such as nebivolol, which has favorable effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, as well as on endothelial function and on oxidative stress, may have favorable effects on arterial stiffness, compared with atenolol. In fact, in recent studies, nebivolol was demonstrated to improve artery stiffness to a greater extent than older β-blockers. Because endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness play an important role in the early atherosclerotic processes and are associated with poor outcomes and increased mortality, independently of blood pressure, the ability of nebivolol to enhance release of endothelium-derived nitric oxide, and consequently improve endothelial function and arterial stiffness, may have significant clinical implications for the use of this agent in the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases

Management of hypercholesterolemia, appropriateness of therapeutic approaches and new drugs in patients with high cardiovascular risk

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lowering low-density lipoproteins-cholesterol (LDL-C) has been shown to decrease the risk of CVD and of all-cause mortality. For appropriate management, estimation of each individual's total cardiovascular risk is critical, as patients should receive treatment according to their cardiovascular risk category as well as their LDL-C level. However, available data indicate that a large proportion of patients fail to achieve lipid goals despite treatment, and a significant percentage of patients are not able to tolerate statin treatment. Researchers have therefore focused considerable attention on the development of novel LDL-C-lowering agents that act via different mechanisms. Among the most recent advances in clinical development are the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 antibody inhibitors, including alirocumab and evolocumab, which appear particularly promising, with clinical trial data indicating these agents to be both well tolerated and highly efficacious in lowering LDL-C

Personalized medicine—a modern approach for the diagnosis and management of hypertension

The main goal of treating hypertension is to reduce blood pressure to physiological levels and thereby prevent risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension-associated target organ damage. Despite reductions in major risk factors and the availability of a plethora of effective antihypertensive drugs, the control of blood pressure to target values is still poor due to multiple factors including apparent drug resistance and lack of adherence. An explanation for this problem is related to the current reductionist and ‘trial-and-error’ approach in the management of hypertension, as we may oversimplify the complex nature of the disease and not pay enough attention to the heterogeneity of the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of the disorder. Taking into account specific risk factors, genetic phenotype, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and other particular features unique to each patient, would allow a personalized approach to managing the disease. Personalized medicine therefore represents the tailoring of medical approach and treatment to the individual characteristics of each patient and is expected to become the paradigm of future healthcare. The advancement of systems biology research and the rapid development of high-throughput technologies, as well as the characterization of different –omics, have contributed to a shift in modern biological and medical research from traditional hypothesis-driven designs toward data-driven studies and have facilitated the evolution of personalized or precision medicine for chronic diseases such as hypertension

Chronic disease in the ethnic minority and migrant groups: time for a paradigm shift in Europe

n/

9A.07: CARDIOVASCULAR TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE IN PREMENOPAUSAL SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS AND IN CONTROLS. ARE THERE ANY DIFFERENCES?

OBJECTIVE: In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) a greater prevalence of structural and functional cardiovascular (CV) alterations has been described, possibly explaining the higher incidence of CV events, as compared to subjects matched for age and sex.Aim of this study was to analyze the presence of target organ damage in premenopausal women with SLE and in controls matched not only for demographic characteristics but also for other cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN AND METHOD: 34 patients with SLE clinically stable (SLEDAI Score 2.5 +/- 1.5) (mean age 32 ± 7 years, range 19-44) and 34 controls matched for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), clinic blood pressure (BP) and antihypertensive treatment (if present), underwent: 24 hours BP monitoring, echocardiography with tissue Doppler analysis (TDI) for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) structure and of systolic and diastolic function, carotid ultrasound for intima-media thickness (IMT) and carotid distensibility measurement, and pulse wave velocity measurement for aortic stiffness (PWV). RESULTS: By definition no difference was observed for age, sex, BMI and clinic BP values and a similar Framingham risk score was observed between SLE and controls (1.3 ± 2.7 vs 1.5 ± 2.3%, p = ns). No significant differences were observed for all echocardiographic parameters except LV longitudinal systolic function (Sm), an early index of LV systolic dysfunction (see Table). Carotid IMT and distensibility, as well as PWV and the prevalence of an abnormal aortic stiffness were both similar in the two groups. At the logistic analysis, PWV was independently associated with LV mass in controls and with the steroid weekly dose in SLE patients.(Figure is included in full-text article.) CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SLE and low activity index of the disease we did not observe significant vascular alterations as compared to controls with similar cardiovascular risk. The early LV systolic impairment observed in this group of patients needs confirmation in larger cohorts

Impact of substitution among generic drugs on persistence and adherence: A retrospective claims data study from 2 Local Healthcare Units in the Lombardy Region of Italy

n/