Design and rationale of a randomised controlled trial comparing apixaban to phenprocoumon in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic haemodialysis::the AXADIA-AFNET 8 study

Introduction Patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring maintenance haemodialysis treatment experience a dramatic cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Due to the high atherosclerotic and arteriosclerotic burden and profound alterations in haemostasis, they frequently suffer and die from both thromboembolic and bleeding events. This is a particular concern in patients on haemodialysis with atrial fibrillation (AF). Controlled trials on the optimal anticoagulation in patients with AF on haemodialysis are not available. The randomised controlled phase IIIb AXADIA-AFNET 8 trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban in patients with AF requiring haemodialysis. Methods and analysis A total of 222 patients will be randomised in an open-labelled, 1:1 design to receive either apixaban 2.5mg twice daily or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonist therapy (target international normalised ratio 2.0-3.0). All patients will be treated and followed up for a minimum of 6 months up to a maximum of 24 months. The primary outcome is major or clinically relevant, non-major bleedings or death of any cause. Secondary outcomes include stroke, cardiovascular death and other thromboembolic events, thus exploring the efficacy of apixaban. The first patient was randomised in June 2017. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Landesaertzekammer, Westfalen-Lippe and the Medical Faculty of the University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (reference number: 2016-598f-A). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients prior to study participation, including their consent for long-term follow-up. AXADIA-AFNET 8 is an investigator-initiated trial. Sponsor is AFNET, Muenster, Germany. Study findings will be disseminated to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Munich, Germany, and Pfizer, Berlin, Germany, to the participating centres, at research conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration numbers NCT02933697, Pre-results

Baseline Characteristics and Prescription Patterns of Standard Drugs in Patients with Angiographically Determined Coronary Artery Disease and Renal Failure (CAD-REF Registry)

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is strongly associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). We established a prospective observational nationwide multicenter registry to evaluate current treatment and outcomes in patients with both CKD and angiographically documented CAD. METHODS: In 32 cardiological centers 3,352 CAD patients with ≥50% stenosis in at least one coronary artery were enrolled and classified according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria into one of five stages of CKD or as a control group. RESULTS: 2,723 (81.2%) consecutively enrolled patients suffered from CKD. Compared to controls, CKD patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, peripheral artery diseases, heart failure, and valvular heart disease (each p<0.001). Myocardial infarctions (p = 0.02), coronary bypass grafting, valve replacements and pacemaker implantations had been recorded more frequently (each p<0.001). With advanced CKD, the number of diseased coronary vessels and the proportion of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased significantly (both p<0.001). Percutaneous coronary interventions were performed less frequently (p<0.001) while coronary bypass grafting was recommended more often (p = 0.04) with advanced CKD. With regard to standard drugs in CAD treatment, prescriptions were higher in our registry than in previous reports, but beta-blockers (p = 0.008), and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin-receptor blockers (p<0.001) were given less often in higher CKD stages. In contrast, in the subgroup of patients with moderately to severely reduced LVEF the prescription rates did not differ between CKD stages. In-hospital mortality increased stepwise with each CKD stage (p = 0.02). COMCLUSIONS: In line with other studies comprising CKD cohorts, patients’ morbidity and in-hospital mortality increased with the degree of renal impairment. Although cardiologists’ drug prescription rates in CAD-REF were higher than in previous studies, they were still lower especially in advanced CKD stages compared to cohorts treated by nephrologists

Secondary Prevention in Lower Extremity Artery Disease Patients: Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Long-Term Guideline Adherence

Lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) affects millions of elderly patients and is associated with elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Risk factor modification, including the therapy of dyslipidaemia, is mandatory to reduce cardiovascular event rates and to improve survival rates. However, only a minority achieve the recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target level &lt; 55 mg/dL, according to the current ESC/EAS guidelines on the treatment of dyslipidaemia. This study elucidated the implementation of the lipid-lowering guideline recommendations of 400 LEAD patients with LDL-C &gt; 100 mg/dL and their adherence to treatment adjustment during follow-up. Despite a sustained statin prescription in 93% of the patients, including 77% with high-intensity statins at follow-up, only 18% achieved the target level. Ezetimibe appeared in 21% and LDL-C goals were reached significantly more often with combination therapy. Recurrent revascularization appeared more often (28%) than coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease progression (14%) and 7% died. Despite the frequent use of high-intensity statins and expandable rates of ezetimibe, the progression of cardiovascular events remained inevitable. Only 18% of the patients had received recommendations on lifestyle modification, including dietary adaptations, which is key for a holistic approach to risk factor control. Thus, efforts for both pharmacological and behavioral strategies are needed to improve clinical outcomes and survival rates

Medikamentöse Sekundärprävention bei Patienten mit peripherer arterieller Verschlusskrankheit

Background!#!Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is an atherosclerotic vascular disease with high morbidity and mortality. A consistent medication-based secondary prevention is part of the essential and evidence-based treatment of PAOD. The aim of this study was to ascertain the status quo of medicinal secondary prevention based on submitted prescriptions.!##!Methods!#!In the time period from 2014 to 2017 patients with a confirmed PAOD coding (I70.2-/I73.9-) were identified based on secondary data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Westphalia-Lippe (KVWL). The prescriptions submitted with respect to platelet inhibitors, oral anticoagulants, lipid lowering therapy (LLT) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the fourth quarter year after diagnosis coding were collated.!##!Results!#!In the diagnosis period 2014/2015 a total of 238,397 patients had PAOD in the catchment area of the KVWL. The proportion of submitted prescriptions in the fourth quarter year after diagnosis was 25.9% for LLT, 13.6% for acetylsalicylic acid, 4.5% for clopidogrel, 5.5% for vitamin K antagonists (VKA), 3.5% for non-vitamin K‑dependent oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and 26.8% for ACE inhibitors. Over the course of the 3 years (n = 241,375 patients with PAOD 2016/2017) the proportion of submitted prescriptions for all substances except VKA increased (p &amp;lt; 0.001), whereby the largest relative increase was noted for NOAC (relative increase of 81.7%).!##!Conclusion!#!The guideline-conform medicinal secondary prevention in patients with PAOD in Germany is still in need of improvement. A consistent implementation of evidence-based medicinal secondary prevention harbors a great potential for improvement of the overall prognosis in patients with PAOD

Sex-specific differences and long-term outcome of patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease: the Coronary Artery Disease and Renal Failure (CAD-REF) Registry

Background!#!Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are closely linked to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Sex-specific long-term outcome data of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and CKD are scarce.!##!Methods!#!In the prospective observational multicenter Coronary Artery Disease and REnal Failure (CAD-REF) Registry, 773 (23.1%) women and 2,579 (76.9%) men with angiographically documented CAD and different stages of CKD were consecutively enrolled and followed for up to 8 years. Long-term outcome was evaluated using survival analysis and multivariable Cox-regression models.!##!Results!#!At enrollment, women were significantly older than men, and suffered from more comorbidities like CKD, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and multivessel coronary disease. Regarding long-term mortality, no sex-specific differences were observed (Kaplan-Meier survival estimates: 69% in women vs. 69% in men, p!##!Conclusions!#!Sex differences in CAD patients mainly exist in the cardiovascular risk profile and the extent of CAD. Long-term mortality was not depended on sex or multivessel disease. More attention should be given to treatment of comorbidities such as CKD and peripheral artery disease being independent predictors of death. Clinical Trail Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00679419

Unmet medical needs in intermittent Claudication with diabetes and coronary artery disease—A “real‐world” analysis on 21 197 PAD patients

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is frequently co‐prevalent with coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes (DM). The study aims to define the burden of CAD and/ or DM in PAD patients at moderate stages and further to evaluate its impact on therapy and outcome. METHODS: Study is based on health insurance claims data of the BARMER reflecting an unselected “real‐world” scenario. Retrospective analyses were based on 21 197 patients hospitalized for PAD Rutherford 1‐3 between 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011, including a 4‐year follow‐up (median 775 days). RESULTS: In PAD patients, CAD is prevalent in 25.3% (n = 5355), DM in 23.5% (n = 4976), and both CAD and DM in 8.2% (n = 1741). Overall, in‐hospital mortality was 0.4%, being increased if CAD was present (CAD alone: OR 1.849; 95%‐CI 1.066‐3.208; DM alone: OR 1.028; 95%‐CI 0.520‐2.033; CAD and DM: OR 3.115; 95%‐CI 1.720‐5.641). Both, CAD and DM increased long‐term mortality (CAD alone: HR 1.234; 95%‐CI 1.106‐1.376; DM alone: HR 1.260; 95%‐CI 1.125‐1.412; CAD and DM: HR 1.76; 95%‐CI 1.552‐1.995). DM further increased long‐term amputation risk (DM alone: HR 2.238; 95%‐CI 1.849‐2.710; DM and CAD: HR 2.199; 95%‐CI 1.732‐2.792), whereas CAD (alone) did not. CONCLUSIONS: In a greater perspective, the data identify also mild to modest stage PAD patients at particular risk for adverse outcomes in presence of CAD and/or DM. CAD and DM both are related with a highly increased risk of long‐term mortality even in intermittent claudication, and DM independently increased amputation risk

Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Cancer Patients, a ‘Real World’ Analysis with 175,000 Patients

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cancer are common and serious diseases. As the prognosis and treatment of both diseases has improved, more cancer patients will suffer an AMI. Unfortunately, data on these “double hit” patients is scarce. Methods: From the largest public German health insurance, anonymized data of all patients with pre-existing cancer who were hospitalized due to ST-elevation MI (STEMI) between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed and followed-up until 2018. Results: Of 175,262 STEMI patients, 27,213 had pre-existing cancer (15.5%). Most frequent were skin (24.9%), prostate (17.0%), colon (11.0%), breast (10.9%), urinary tract (10.6%), and lung cancer (5.2%). STEMI patients with malignancies were older and presented more often with coronary three-vessel disease, atrial arrhythmias, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, cerebrovascular and peripheral artery disease (PAD, each p p p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large “real world” data, prognosis after STEMI in cancer patients was markedly reduced but differed widely between cancer types. Of note, no withholding of interventional treatments in cancer patients could be observed