Insights into Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardias in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy / Dysplasia

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/ dysplasia (ARVC/D), mostly affecting young/middle-aged individuals, poses a significant risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and subsequent sudden cardiac death (SCD). Antiarrhythmic agents (AAA) provide insufficient arrhythmia suppression and prevention and can be proarrhythmic. Thus, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is considered the first-line treatment, especially in patients with secondary prevention indication. Nevertheless, catheter ablation is an additional therapy to the ICD which has proved its efficacy in primary and secondary prevention of fatal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The superiority of the combined endo- and epicardial VT ablation in this population is clear since ARVC/D substrate has been shown to be mostly epicardial. Due to progressive nature of ARVC/D, ablation seems to be a useful tool for the patients who experience recurrent VT episodes or electrical storms

Insights into Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardias in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy / Dysplasia

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/ dysplasia (ARVC/D), mostly affecting young/middle-aged individuals, poses a significant risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and subsequent sudden cardiac death (SCD). Antiarrhythmic agents (AAA) provide insufficient arrhythmia suppression and prevention and can be proarrhythmic. Thus, the implantable cardioverters-defibrillator (ICD) is considered the first-line treatment, especially in patients with secondary prevention indication. Nevertheless, catheter ablation is an additional therapy to the ICD which has proved its efficacy in primary and secondary prevention of fatal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The superiority of the combined endo- and epicardial VT ablation in this population is clear since the ARVC/D substrate has been shown to be mostly epicardial. Due to progressive nature of ARVC/D, ablation seems to be a useful tool for the patients who experience recurrent VT episodes or electrical storms

Results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophied hearts – Comparison between primary and secondary hypertrophy

AbstractBackground and purposeApproximately 20–25% of the patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) develop atrial fibrillation (AF) during the clinical course of the disease, a percentage significantly larger than that of the general population. The purpose of the present study was to report on the procedural results of patients with AF and either primary or secondary left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).Methods and subjectsTwenty-two consecutive HCM patients (55% male, mean age 57±8 years) with symptomatic AF, having undergone AF ablation procedures between September 2009 and July 2012 were compared with respect to procedural outcome and follow-up characteristics with 22 matched controls with secondary cardiac hypertrophy (64% male, 63±10 years) from our prospective AF catheter ablation registry.Results and conclusionRadiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was successful in restoring long-term sinus rhythm in patients with LVH due to HCM and due to secondary etiology. However, patients with HCM needed more RFCA procedures and frequently additional antiarrhythmic drug therapy in order to maintain sinus rhythm

P-wave duration and interatrial block as predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) could improve patient outcomes. P-wave duration (PWD) and interatrial block (IAB) are known predictors of new-onset AF and could improve selection for AF screening. This meta-analysis reviews the published evidence and offers practical implications. Methods: Publication databases were systematically searched, and studies reporting PWD and/or morphology at baseline and new-onset AF during follow-up were included. IAB was defined as partial (pIAB) if PWD≥120 ms or advanced (aIAB) if the P-wave was biphasic in the inferior leads. After quality assessment and data extraction, random-effects analysis calculated odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis was performed for those with implantable devices (continuous monitoring). Results: Among 16,830 patients (13 studies, mean 66 years old), 2,521 (15%) had new-onset AF over a median of 44 months. New-onset AF was associated with a longer PWD (mean pooled difference: 11.5 ms, 13 studies, p < 0.001). The OR for new-onset AF was 2.05 (95% CI: 1.3-3.2) for pIAB (5 studies, p = 0.002) and 3.9 (95% CI: 2.6-5.8) for aIAB (7 studies, p < 0.001). Patients with pIAB and devices had higher AF-detection risk (OR: 2.33, p < 0.001) than those without devices (OR: 1.36, p = 0.56). Patients with aIAB had similarly high risk regardless of device presence. There was significant heterogeneity but no publication bias. Conclusion: Interatrial block is an independent predictor of new-onset AF. The association is stronger for patients with implantable devices (close monitoring). Thus, PWD and IAB could be used as selection criteria for intensive screening, follow-up or interventions