Charges from Dressed Matter: Physics and Renormalisation

Gauge theories are characterised by long range interactions. Neglecting these interactions at large times, and identifying the Lagrangian matter fields with the asymptotic physical fields, leads to the infra-red problem. In this paper we study the perturbative applications of a construction of physical charges in QED, where the matter fields are combined with the associated electromagnetic clouds. This has been formally shown, in a companion paper, to include these asymptotic interactions. It is explicitly demonstrated that the on-shell Green's functions and S-matrix elements describing these charged fields have, to all orders in the coupling, the pole structure associated with particle propagation and scattering. We show in detail that the renormalisation procedure may be carried out straightforwardly. It is shown that standard infra-red finite predictions of QED are not altered and it is speculated that the good infra-red properties of our construction may open the way to the calculation of previously uncalculable properties. Finally extensions of this approach to QCD are briefly discussed.Comment: 34 pages, LaTeX, uses FeynMF, 17 figures, very minor wording change, version to appear in Annals of Physic

Anti-Screening by Quarks and the Structure of the Inter-Quark Potential

The inter-quark potential is dominated by anti-screening effects which underly asymptotic freedom. We calculate the order g^6 anti-screening contribution from light fermions and demonstrate that these effects introduce a non-local divergence. These divergences are shown to make it impossible to define a coupling renormalisation scheme that renormalises this minimal, anti-screening potential. Hence the beta function cannot be divided into screening and anti-screening parts beyond lowest order. However, we then demonstrate that renormalisation can be carried out in terms of the anti-screening potential.Comment: 11 pages, some clarifications and typographical corrections, to appear in Physics Letters

Charged Particles: A Builder's Guide

It is sometimes claimed that one cannot describe charged particles in gauge theories. We identify the root of the problem and present an explicit construction of charged particles. This is shown to have good perturbative properties and, asymptotically before and after scattering, to recover particle modes.Comment: 6 pages, LaTeX, to appear in proceedings of Sixth Workshop on Non-Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, Paris, June 200

The Structure of the QCD Potential in 2+1 Dimensions

We calculate the screening and anti-screening contributions to the inter-quark potential in 2+1 dimensions, which is relevant to the high temperature limit of QCD. We demonstrate that the relative strength of screening to anti-screening agrees with the 3+1 dimensional theory to better than one percent accuracy.Comment: 9 pages, LaTeX, no figures, version to appear in Journa

Infra-Red Finite Charge Propagation

The Coulomb gauge has a long history and many uses. It is especially useful in bound state applications. An important feature of this gauge is that the matter fields have an infra-red finite propagator in an on-shell renormalisation scheme. This is, however, only the case if the renormalisation point is chosen to be the static point on the mass shell, p = (m, 0, 0, 0). In this letter we show how to extend this key property of the Coulomb gauge to an arbitrary relativistic renormalisation point. This is achieved through the introduction of a new class of gauges of which the Coulomb gauge is a limiting case. A physical explanation for this result is given.Comment: 8 pages, plain TeX, to appear in Modern Physics Letters

The Structure of Screening in QED

The possibility of constructing charged particles in gauge theories has long been the subject of debate. In the context of QED we have shown how to construct operators which have a particle description. In this paper we further support this programme by showing how the screening interactions arise between these charges. Unexpectedly we see that there are two different gauge invariant contributions with opposite signs. Their difference gives the expected result.Comment: 8 pages, LaTe