20 research outputs found

    The SWI/SNF ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Complex in Arabidopsis Responds to Environmental Changes in Temperature-Dependent Manner

    Get PDF
    SWI/SNF ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes (CRCs) play important roles in the regulation of transcription, cell cycle, DNA replication, repair, and hormone signaling in eukaryotes. The core of SWI/SNF CRCs composed of a SWI2/SNF2 type ATPase, a SNF5 and two of SWI3 subunits is sufficient for execution of nucleosome remodeling in vitro. The Arabidopsis genome encodes four SWI2/SNF2 ATPases, four SWI3, a single SNF5 and two SWP73 subunits. Genes of the core SWI/SNF components have critical but not fully overlapping roles during plant growth, embryogenesis, and sporophyte development. Here we show that the Arabidopsis swi3c mutant exhibits a phenotypic reversion when grown at lower temperature resulting in partial restoration of its embryo, root development and fertility defects. Our data indicates that the swi3c mutation alters the expression of several genes engaged in low temperature responses. The location of SWI3C-containing SWI/SNF CRCs on the ICE1, MYB15 and CBF1 target genes depends on the temperature conditions, and the swi3c mutation thus also influences the transcription of several cold-responsive (COR) genes. These findings, together with genetic analysis of swi3c/ice1 double mutant and enhanced freezing tolerance of swi3c plants illustrate that SWI/SNF CRCs contribute to fine tuning of plant growth responses to different temperature regimes

    SWP73 Subunits of Arabidopsis SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complexes Play Distinct Roles in Leaf and Flower Development

    Get PDF
    Arabidopsis thaliana SWP73A and SWP73B are homologs of mammalian BRAHMA-associated factors (BAF60s) that tether SWITCH/SUCROSE NONFERMENTING chromatin remodeling complexes to transcription factors of genes regulating various cell differentiation pathways. Here, we show that Arabidopsis thaliana SWP73s modulate several important developmental pathways. While undergoing normal vegetative development, swp73a mutants display reduced expression of FLOWERING LOCUS C and early flowering in short days. By contrast, swp73b mutants are characterized by retarded growth, severe defects in leaf and flower development, delayed flowering, and male sterility. MNase-Seq, transcript profiling, and ChIP-Seq studies demonstrate that SWP73B binds the promoters of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2, KANADI1 and 3, and YABBY2, 3, and 5 genes, which regulate leaf development and show coordinately altered transcription in swp73b plants. Lack of SWP73B alters the expression patterns of APETALA1, APETALA3, and the MADS box gene AGL24, whereas other floral organ identity genes show reduced expression correlating with defects in flower development. Consistently, SWP73B binds to the promoter regions of APETALA1 and 3, SEPALLATA3, LEAFY, UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS, TERMINAL FLOWER1, AGAMOUS-LIKE24, and SUPPRESSOR OF CONSTANS OVEREXPRESSION1 genes, and the swp73b mutation alters nucleosome occupancy on most of these loci. In conclusion, SWP73B acts as important modulator of major developmental pathways, while SWP73A functions in flowering time control

    Genetic Analyses of Interactions among Gibberellin, Abscisic Acid, and Brassinosteroids in the Control of Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Get PDF
    Genetic interactions between phytohormones in the control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana have not been extensively studied. Three phytohormones have been individually connected to the floral-timing program. The inductive function of gibberellins (GAs) is the most documented. Abscisic acid (ABA) has been demonstrated to delay flowering. Finally, the promotive role of brassinosteroids (BRs) has been established. It has been reported that for many physiological processes, hormone pathways interact to ensure an appropriate biological response.We tested possible genetic interactions between GA-, ABA-, and BR-dependent pathways in the control of the transition to flowering. For this, single and double mutants deficient in the biosynthesis of GAs, ABA, and BRs were used to assess the effect of hormone deficiency on the timing of floral transition. Also, plants that over-express genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes in each biosynthetic pathway were generated and the flowering time of these lines was investigated.Loss-of-function studies revealed a complex relationship between GAs and ABA, and between ABA and BRs, and suggested a cross-regulatory relation between GAs to BRs. Gain-of-function studies revealed that GAs were clearly limiting in their sufficiency of action, whereas increases in BRs and ABA led to a more modest phenotypic effect on floral timing. We conclude from our genetic tests that the effects of GA, ABA, and BR on timing of floral induction are only in partially coordinated action

    Overexpression lines for rate-limiting enzymes in various phytohormone pathways.

    No full text
    <p>Transgenic lines harboring <i>35S::DWF4</i>, <i>35S::GA5</i> and <i>35S::NCED3</i> constructs. <b><i>A.</i></b> Over-expression was confirmed by RT-PCR with primers specific for <i>DWF4</i>, <i>GA5</i> and <i>NCED3</i>. Primers specific for the elongation factor 1-alpha gene were used as a control. Representative lines are shown. All lines tested showed over-expression of the gene of interest >3 fold. <b><i>B.</i></b> Images of 3-weeks-old plants grown under long days (16 h light/8 h darkness) in the greenhouse. The white bar indicates 1 cm.</p

    Student's t-test for flowering-time differences between mutant genotypes.

    No full text
    <p>Listed are pairs of compared genotypes. P values for each pair are provided.</p><p>ø No significant difference P>0.05;</p><p>statistically significant differences:</p><p>***P<0.0001,</p><p>**P<0.001,</p><p>*P<0.05.</p

    Simplified hormone biosynthetic pathways.

    No full text
    <p>The hormone biosynthetic pathways of Arabidopsis for gibberellins <b><i>A.</i></b>, ABA <b><i>B.</i></b>, and, brassinolide <b><i>C.</i></b>. The biosynthesis mutants used in this study and sites of their lesions are shown. Also, the biosynthetic genes over-expressed to increase the levels of respective hormones are indicated. <b><i>A.</i></b> The <i>ga1</i> mutant is impaired in the first stage of GA-biosynthesis: the cyclization of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) to copalyl diphosphate (CPP). <b><i>B.</i></b> The <i>aba2</i> mutant is blocked at the cis-xanthoxin to ABA-aldehyde conversion. <b><i>C.</i></b> The conversion of 6-Deoxocathasterone/Cathasterone to 6- Deoxoteasterone/teasterone does not occur in the <i>cpd</i> mutant. <b><i>A.</i></b> The <i>GA5</i> gene encodes a GA 20-oxidase that catalyzes the formation of the GA20 and GA9, the final precursors of the bioactive GAs. <b><i>B.</i></b> The <i>NCED3</i> encodes 9-<i>cis</i>-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase that catalyzes the oxidative cleavage of a 9-<i>cis</i> isomer of epoxycarotenoid (9-<i>cis</i>-violaxanthin or 9’-<i>cis</i>-neoxanthin) to form xanthoxin. <b><i>C.</i></b> The <i>DWF4</i> gene encodes a 22-a hydroxylase (CYP90B1) that catalyzes the conversion of 6- Oxocampestanol/Campestanol to 6-Deoxocathasterone/Cathasterone. IPP, Isopentenyl pyrophosphate. ABA, abscisic acid. Adapted from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0014012#pone.0014012-Srivastava1" target="_blank">[49]</a>.</p

    New molecular targets in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells

    Get PDF
    Recent discoveries shed light on molecular mechanisms responsible for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) development and progression, along with features of Hodgkin – Reed and Sternberg cells (HRS). Here, we summarize current knowledge on characteristic molecular alterations in HL, as well as existing targeted therapies and potential novel treatments for this disease. We discuss the importance of cluster of differentiation molecule 30 (CD30) and the programmed cell death-1 protein (PD-1) and ligands (PD-L1/2), and other molecules involved in immune modulation in HL. We highlight emerging evidence indicating that the altered function of SWI/SNF-type chromatin remodeling complexes, PRC2, and other epigenetic modifiers, contribute to variations in chromatin status, which are typical for HL. We postulate that despite of the existence of plentiful molecular data, the understanding of HL development remains incomplete. We therefore propose research directions involving analysis of reverse signaling in the PD-1/PD-L1 mechanism, chromatin remodeling, and epigenetics-related alterations, in order to identify HL features at the molecular level. Such attempts may lead to the identification of new molecular targets, and thus will likely substantially contribute to the future development of more effective targeted therapies

    Intrathecal Infusion of Autologous Adipose-Derived Regenerative Cells in Autoimmune Refractory Epilepsy: Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy

    No full text
    Objective/Purpose. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) treatment in autoimmune refractory epilepsy. Patients. Six patients with proven or probable autoimmune refractory epilepsy (2 with Rasmussen encephalitis, 2 with antineuronal autoantibodies in serum, and 2 with possible FIRES) were included in the project with approval of the Bioethics Committee. Method. Intrathecal injection of autologous ADRC acquired through liposuction followed by enzymatic isolation was performed. The procedure was repeated 3 times every 3 months with each patient. Neurological status, brain MRI, cognitive function, and antiepileptic effect were monitored during 12 months. Results. Immediately after the procedure, all patients were in good condition. In some cases, transient mildly elevated body temperature, pain in regions of liposuction, and slight increasing number of seizures during 24 hours were observed. During the next months, some improvements in school, social functioning, and manual performance were observed in all patients. One patient has been seizure free up to the end of trial. In other patients, frequency of seizures was different: from reduced number to the lack of improvement (3-year follow-up). Conclusion. Autologous ADRC therapy may emerge as a promising option for some patients with autoimmune refractory epilepsy. Based on our trial and other clinical data, the therapy appears to be safe and feasible. Antiepileptic efficacy proved to be various; however, some abilities improved in all children. No signs of psychomotor regression were observed during the first year following the treatment
    corecore