3 research outputs found

    A Research Agenda for Microclimate Ecology in Human-Modified Tropical Forests

    Get PDF
    Logging and habitat fragmentation impact tropical forest ecosystems in numerous ways, perhaps the most striking of which is by altering the temperature, humidity, and light environment of the forest—its microclimate. Because local-scale microclimatic conditions directly influence the physiology, demography and behavior of most species, many of the impacts of land-use intensification on the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning of tropical forests have been attributed to changes in microclimate. However, the actual pathways through which altered microclimatic conditions reshape the ecology of these human-modified ecosystems remain largely unexplored. To bridge this knowledge gap, here we outline an agenda for future microclimate research in human-modified tropical ecosystems. We focus specifically on three main themes: the role of microclimate in shaping (i) species distributions, (ii) species interactions, and (iii) ecosystem functioning in tropical forests. In doing so we aim to highlight how a renewed focus on microclimate can help us not only better understand the ecology of human-modified tropical ecosystems, but also guide efforts to manage and protect them

    Efeitos da distância entre iscas nas estimativas de abundância e riqueza de formigas em uma floresta de terra-firme na Amazônia Central Effects of bait spacing on ant abundance and richness in one forest at Central Amazonia

    Get PDF
    Coletas com iscas são amplamente utilizadas para investigar a atividade de formigas de solo e vegetação e também podem ser empregadas para estimar o número de espécies e a abundância de formigas. Apesar de ser barata e fácil de implementar, a riqueza e abundância das formigas estimadas por iscas podem ser enviesadas por alguns fatores, como a distância entre iscas. Neste trabalho, avaliamos se a distância entre iscas altera as estimativas de abundância e riqueza de formigas e qual distância entre iscas resulta na melhor relação entre custo financeiro e número de espécies amostradas, objetivo da maioria dos relatórios de impacto ambiental. Amostramos 30 transectos de 100 m com distância entre iscas diferentes (2,5; 3,4; 5; 6,7; 10 e 20 m), distribuídos em uma área de 1 km² em uma floresta de terra-firme ao norte de Manaus. Independente da distância entre iscas, o número de espécies coletado a cada cinco iscas, foi aproximadamente 8, e a abundância média foi maior que 50 indivíduos. No entanto o número de espécies por isca foi maior em transectos com maior distância entre iscas. Transectos com distância entre iscas de 10 e 20 m, coletaram 50% mais espécies por isca que transectos com iscas distantes a 2,5 e 3,4 m entre si. Nossos resultados sugerem que nesta área, a amostragem mais eficiente desse método de coleta seria distribuir 450 iscas a cada 10 m ou 20 m no solo da floresta.<br>Baits are widely used to investigate the activity of terrestrial and arboreal ants, but also can be used to estimate the ant abundance and species richness. Despite the fact that baiting are cheap and easy to implement, many factors, such as the distance between baits, may influence the estimate of ant species richness and abundance. In this study, we evaluated the effects of bait spacing on abundance and the number of ant species. We also demonstrate which distance between baits showed the best relationship between costs and number of ant species sampled. We sampled 30 transects of 100 m with bait spacing ranging from 2.5 to 20 m, spread over 1 km² of a "terra-firme" forest situated at North of Manaus. The bait spacing did not affect the ant diversity estimative. Regardless bait spacing, the number of species collected every five baits was around 8, and the average abundance was approximately 50 individuals. However the number of species per bait was higher in transects with larger bait spacing. Transects with bait spacing of 10 m and 20 m, collected 50% more species than transects with baits placed 2.5 m and 3.4 m apart. Our results suggest that at this forest, the most efficient sampling design using only baits would be place 450 baits every 10 m or 20 m at the forest floo
    corecore