APOE and Other Loci Affect Age-At-Onset in Alzheimer's Disease Families With PS2 Mutation

Several kindreds of Volga German (VG) ancestry have a single PS2 mutation that causes an autosomal dominant form of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These families show a wide range in age-at-onset, which suggests the existence of modifying factors other than the PS2 mutation. To examine evidence for a genetic basis of variation in onset age, we performed a Bayesian oligogenic segregation and linkage analysis on nine VG families confirmed to have at least one affected PS2 carrier. This analysis simultaneously estimated the effects of APOE and PS2 and the number and effects of additional loci affecting AD age-at-onset. In addition, a family effect accounted for shared environmental effects. This analysis approach has the advantage of full use of the complete pedigree structure, as well as use of information on unsampled individuals with phenotypic data. These analyses provide evidence that APOE plays a small, but significant, role in modifying the ageat-onset in these VG families. The effects estimated for the APOE e3 and e4 genotypes were consistent with those estimated in previous analysis of late-onset AD families, with evidence for a dose-dependent relationship between number of e4 alleles and age-at-onset. We estimated an $83$70, $2,$6.5, and $8.5%, respectively. These results provide evidence that APOE and other loci modify onset in AD caused by PS2 mutation

Evidence for a Novel Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease Locus on Chromosome 19p13.2

Late-onset familial Alzheimer disease (LOFAD) is a genetically heterogeneous and complex disease for which only one locus, APOE, has been definitively identified. Difficulties in identifying additional loci are likely to stem from inadequate linkage analysis methods. Nonparametric methods suffer from low power because of limited use of the data, and traditional parametric methods suffer from limitations in the complexity of the genetic model that can be feasibly used in analysis. Alternative methods that have recently been developed include Bayesian Markov chain–Monte Carlo methods. These methods allow multipoint linkage analysis under oligogenic trait models in pedigrees of arbitrary size; at the same time, they allow for inclusion of covariates in the analysis. We applied this approach to an analysis of LOFAD on five chromosomes with previous reports of linkage. We identified strong evidence of a second LOFAD gene on chromosome 19p13.2, which is distinct from APOE on 19q. We also obtained weak evidence of linkage to chromosome 10 at the same location as a previous report of linkage but found no evidence for linkage of LOFAD age-at-onset loci to chromosomes 9, 12, or 21

Comparing test‐specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer’s disease

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152479/1/alzjjalz200804007.pd

Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND: Genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may be conferred by the susceptibility polymorphism apolipoprotein E (APOE), where the ε4 allele increases the risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer’s disease but is not a definitive predictor of the disease, or by autosomal dominant mutations (e.g., the presenilins), which almost inevitably result in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychological impact of using these two different types of genetic information to disclose genetic risk for AD to family members of affected patients. METHODS: Data were compared from two separate protocols. The Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer’s Disease (REVEAL) Study is a randomized, multi-site clinical trial that evaluated the impact of susceptibility testing for Alzheimer’s disease with APOE in 101 adult children of Alzheimer’s disease patients. A separate study, conducted at the University of Washington, assessed the impact of deterministic genetic testing by disclosing presenilin-1, presenilin-2, or TAU genotype to 22 individuals at risk for familial Alzheimer’s disease or frontotemporal dementia. In both protocols, participants received genetic counseling and completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES), a measure of test-specific distress. Scores were analyzed at the time point closest to one year post-disclosure at which IES data were available. The role of genetic test result (positive vs. negative) and type of genetic testing (deterministic vs. susceptibility) in predicting log-transformed IES scores was assessed with linear regression, controlling for age, gender, and time from disclosure. RESULTS: Subjects from the REVEAL Study who learned that they were positive for the susceptibility gene APOE ε4+ experienced similar, low levels of test-specific distress compared to those who received positive results of deterministic testing in the University of Washington study (p= 0.78). APOE ε4+ individuals in the susceptibility protocol experienced more test-specific distress than those who tested ε4− in the same study (p= 0.04); however, among those receiving deterministic test disclosure, the subjects who received positive results did not experience significantly higher levels of distress when compared to those who received negative results (p= 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this preliminary study, with limited sample size, suggest that the test-related distress experienced by those receiving positive results for a deterministic mutation is similar to the distress experienced by those receiving positive results from genetic susceptibility testing, and that the majority of participants receiving genotype disclosure do not experience clinically significant distress as indicated by IES scores one year after learning of their test results