2 research outputs found
Sexual counselling for patients with cardiovascular disease: protocol for a pilot study of the CHARMS sexual counselling intervention.
Introduction Sexual problems are common with cardiovascular disease, and can negatively impact quality of life. To address sexual problems, guidelines have identified the importance of sexual counselling during cardiac rehabilitation, yet this is rarely provided. The Cardiac Health and Relationship Management and Sexuality (CHARMS) intervention aims to improve the provision of sexual counselling in cardiac rehabilitation in Ireland.Methods and analysis This is a multicentre pilot study for the CHARMS intervention, a complex, multilevel intervention delivered within hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes. The intervention includes (1) training in sexual counselling for staff, (2) a staff-led patient education and support intervention embedded within the cardiac rehabilitation programme, (3) a patient information booklet and (4) an awareness raising poster. The intervention will be delivered in two randomly selected cardiac rehabilitation centres. In each centre 30 patients will be recruited, and partners will also be invited to participate. Data will be collected from staff and patients/partners at T1 (study entry), T2 (3-month follow-up) and T3 (6-month follow-up). The primary outcome for patients/partners will be scores on the Sexual Self-Perception and Adjustment Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes for patients/partners will include relationship satisfaction; satisfaction with and barriers to sexual counselling in services; sexual activity, functioning and knowledge; physical and psychological well-being. Secondary outcomes for staff will include sexuality-related practice; barriers to sexual counselling; self-ratings of capability, opportunity and motivation; sexual attitudes and beliefs; knowledge of cardiovascular disease and sex. Fidelity of intervention delivery will be assessed using trainer self-reports, researcher-coded audio recordings and exit interviews. Longitudinal feasibility data will be gathered from patients/partners and staff via questionnaires and interviews.Ethics and dissemination This study is approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the National University of Ireland, Galway. Findings will be disseminated to cardiac rehabilitation staff, patients/partners and relevant policymakers via appropriate publications and presentations
The CHARMS pilot study: a multi-method assessment of the feasibility of a sexual counselling implementation intervention in cardiac rehabilitation in Ireland
Background: Many people living with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are affected by sexual problems associated with
the condition. International guidelines recommend all patients with CVD should receive sexual counselling, yet this
is rarely provided by health professionals. The current study piloted the Cardiac Health and Relationship
Management and Sexuality (CHARMS) intervention, a complex multi-level intervention designed to increase
the implementation of sexual counselling guidelines in hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in Ireland.
Methods: The CHARMS intervention, consisting of awareness training and skills development for staff, and education
and support for patients, was implemented in two CR centres. Following a repeated measures design, quantitative and
qualitative feasibility, fidelity, cost, and outcome data were collected from staff and patients at baseline (T1,
pre-intervention), at 3 months post-baseline (T2, post-intervention), and at 6 months post-baseline (T3, postintervention). Data were organised according to a 14-point reporting framework of methodological issues that
should be examined in pilot and feasibility studies. To inform a future definitive trial, potential solutions to identified
feasibility issues were generated using the ADePT process for decision-making after pilot and feasibility trials.
Results: Most elements of the study protocol were executed smoothly, and intervention implementation was
successful. Patients’ (N = 42) responses to the intervention were positive. The reporting framework and the
ADePT process facilitated the identification of two overarching feasibility problems, as well as solutions to be
implemented in a definitive trial: (1) a high level of patient attrition in the pilot study, to be addressed through the use
of financial incentives, reducing the length of the patient questionnaire, and providing a telephone survey option; and
(2) negative staff perceptions, to be addressed through an augmented staff intervention, reframing ‘sexual counselling’
as ‘sexual education and support’ to fit with professional role perceptions, and reviewing all intervention terminology
with a CR staff member to ensure acceptability.
Conclusions: This article reports the successful piloting of a novel sexual counselling implementation intervention in
cardiac rehabilitation. The utilisation of an extended reporting framework and the ADePT process facilitated
the identification of adaptations necessary to ensure the feasibility of a definitive trial, thereby maximising
methodological transparency