Guideline-led prescribing to heart failure patients in Ireland and Egypt

Introduction: Guidelines strongly recommend patients with Heart Failure (HF) be treated with multiple medications proven to improve clinical outcomes, as tolerated. Guideline-led prescribing of HF evidence-based medicines is strongly associated with improved survival, prognosis, and quality of life in HF. The guidelines strongly recommend, and the optimal patient outcomes are achieved with an appropriate prescription of target doses of all HF therapies. The degree to which gaps in medication use and dosing persist in contemporary Irish or Egyptian practices is unclear. Aim: To assess guideline-led prescribing of the evidence-based HF medications in routine clinical practice in Ireland and Egypt and to assess the prevalence of HF-specific potentially inappropriate prescribing in the same Irish and Egyptian clinical settings. Method: Firstly, a narrative literature review was undertaken to determine and compare the available data and gaps in knowledge regarding HF management in Ireland as a developed European country, and Egypt as a developing Middle-Eastern country, with a particular focus on the guideline-directed medical therapies. Secondly, a systematic review was undertaken to identify the objective quantitative tools to assess the quality of HF prescribing practice. Next, a prospective cohort study was conducted on an Irish outpatient population to evaluate the extent of use and dosing of the guideline-directed medical therapies. Then, a multicentre retrospective study was carried out in 14 Long-Term Care (LTC) facilities in Cork County to assess the prevalence of appropriate and potentially inappropriate prescribing practices. In Egypt, a longitudinal observational study was conducted in order to evaluate the prescribing quality and patterns in HF patients in an Egyptian critical care setting at discharge. Finally, a descriptive survey was developed to address the barriers to guideline-led prescribing in a middle-income setting. Results: The literature review identified many gaps in knowledge in the Egyptian and Irish literature on HF. For instance, the studies included in the review did not discuss the target dose prescribing. The systematic review identified the widespread use of the Guideline Adherence Index (GAI-3) in 13 studies worldwide in the quantitative assessment of HF prescribing. The Irish HF outpatient study showed room for optimising the prescription of the guideline-directed medical therapies in 34% of ambulatory patients. No patient achieved the 100% target dose of all three evidence-based medications. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing was 20%. The Irish LTC study showed that patients with HF were older than those without HF (84.8 ± 7.4 vs 83.4 ± 7.9 years, p-value = 0.024). Loop diuretic was the most frequently prescribed HF medication up to 88% of the total population and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors to 24.2% only. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in LTC was 24%. On the other hand, the Egyptian longitudinal study showed the moderate adherence level at discharge from the critical care unit but the potential role of clinical pharmacy service in HF drug therapy optimisation via improving beta-blocker prescription rates by from 24% to 38% and reducing digoxin rates from 34% to 23%. However, the service did not improve the overall guideline adherence levels or the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing. The survey explored some new aspects in HF practice, such as the urgent need for locally-drafted guidelines and the more significant implementation of clinical pharmacy service to optimise the implementation of guideline-led prescribing in routine clinical practice. Conclusion: This thesis has made a significant contribution to the knowledge and generated a much needed conceptual understanding of the complexity of HF guideline-led prescribing. This work reflects the moderate adherence levels to guidelines and high prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in the two countries. None of the prescribers either in Ireland or Egypt prescribed at least a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor to all HF patients despite the strong, long-standing evidence

A tool for assessment of heart failure prescribing quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) guidelines aim to standardise patient care. Internationally, prescribing practice in HF may deviate from guidelines and so a standardised tool is required to assess prescribing quality. A systematic review and meta‐analysis were performed to identify a quantitative tool for measuring adherence to HF guidelines and its clinical implications. Methods: Eleven electronic databases were searched to include studies reporting a comprehensive tool for measuring adherence to prescribing guidelines in HF patients aged ≥18 years. Qualitative studies or studies measuring prescription rates alone were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Good ReseArch for Comparative Effectiveness Checklist. Results: In total, 2455 studies were identified. Sixteen eligible full‐text articles were included (n = 14 354 patients, mean age 69 ± 8 y). The Guideline Adherence Index (GAI), and its modified versions, was the most frequently cited tool (n = 13). Other tools identified were the Individualised Reconciled Evidence Recommendations, the Composite Heart Failure Performance, and the Heart Failure Scale. The meta‐analysis included the GAI studies of good to high quality. The average GAI‐3 was 62%. Compared to low GAI, high GAI patients had lower mortality rate (7.6% vs 33.9%) and lower rehospitalisation rates (23.5% vs 24.5%); both P ≤ .05. High GAI was associated with reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval, 0.06‐0.51) and rehospitalisation (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval, 0.41‐1.00). No tool was used to improve prescribing quality. Conclusion: The GAI is the most frequently used tool to assess guideline adherence in HF. High GAI is associated with improved HF outcomes

Correlation Between Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Proteinuria in Type-2 Diabetic Patients

Introduction: Diabetic Nephropathy (DN) is the single most common cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in many countries. Inflammation is a potential factor in the development and progression of DN and recent data indicate that diabetes includes an inflammatory component which may contribute to diabetic complications. Methods: This study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospital on 95 patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus complicated with retinopathy and fifteen age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Diabetic patients were divided into 4 groups according to the degree of proteinuria. Serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), urine TNF-α and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured in all subjects. Correlations between these inflammatory parameters and degree of proteinuria, duration of diabetes and degree of glycemic control were examined. Results: Levels of the three inflammatory parameters were significantly higher in diabetic patients when compared to control subjects, and they were positively correlated to urinary protein excretion. There was significant positive correlation between serum and urine TNF-α and duration of diabetes, as well as between serum TNF-α and glycemic control. Serum and urine TNF-α remained as independent predictors of urine protein excretion in diabetic patients with overt proteinuria after forward stepwise multiple regression analysis. Conclusion: Serum and urine TNF-α and CRP levels are significantly elevated in this group of diabetic patients, and correlate positively with severity of proteinuria. This suggests a significant role for TNF-α in the pathogenesis and progression of renal injury in diabetes mellitus. Keywards: Diabetic nephropathy; Proteinuria; Tumor necrosis factor-

Heart failure prescribing quality at discharge from a critical care unit in Egypt: The impact of multidisciplinary care

Discharge prescriptions for heart failure (HF) patients may not adhere to the clinical practice guidelines. This study aimed to assess the impact of the clinical pharmacist as a member of a multidisciplinary team on the quality of prescribing to HF patients at discharge from a Critical Care Unit (CCU) in Egypt. This was a retrospective cohort study of HF patients discharged from the CCU between January 2013 and December 2017. Guideline Adherence Index (GAI-3) was used to assess guideline-directed prescribing at discharge. Multidisciplinary care was introduced to the CCU on 1 January 2016. The study included 284 HF patients, mean (±SD) age 66.7 ± 11.5 years, 53.2% male. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction affected 100 patients (35.2%). At discharge, loop diuretics were prescribed to 85.2% of patients; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists to 54.9%; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers to 51.4%; and β-blockers to 29.9%. Population Guideline Adherence Index (GAI-3) was 45.5%. High-GAI was prescribed to 136 patients (47.9%). Patients with High-GAI were younger; less affected by chronic kidney disease and had fewer comorbidities than those without High-GAI. Prescription of β-blocker increased (24.1% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.001) and digoxin utilization decreased (34.7% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.049) after the introduction of the multidisciplinary care. The inclusion of a clinical pharmacist in the multidisciplinary care team may have a role in optimizing the prescribing of HF guideline-directed therapies at discharge from this setting

Factors influencing prescribing by critical care physicians to heart failure patients in Egypt: a cross-sectional survey

Background: Heart failure (HF) guideline-led prescribing improves patient outcomes; however, little is known about the factors influencing guideline-led prescribing in critical care settings. This study used a cross-sectional survey to assess the factors that influence physicians when prescribing to heart failure patients in a critical care setting in Egypt. Results: The response rate was 54.8%. The international HF guidelines were the primary source of prescribing information for 84.2% of respondents. Staff were more familiar with the latest guideline recommendations than associate staff (86.7% vs 36.8%, p&#8201;=&#8201;0.012) and considered patientâ s perspectives more often (86.7% vs 26.3%, p&#8201;=&#8201;0.036). Renal function was the clinical factor that most frequently influenced the prescribing of loop diuretics or reninâ angiotensinâ aldosterone system inhibitors. Pulmonary function influenced beta-blockers prescription. The most frequently cited barrier to guideline-led prescribing was the absence of locally drafted guidelines. A majority of prescribers agreed that implementation of clinical pharmacy services, physician education and electronic reminders may improve the implementation of guideline-led prescribing. Conclusions: Although experienced physicians are familiar with and use international guidelines, physicians would welcome local guidance on HF prescribing and greater clinical pharmacist input

Guideline-led prescribing to ambulatory heart failure patients in a cardiology outpatient service

Background Guidelines recommend heart failure (HF) patients be treated with multiple medications at doses proven to improve clinical outcomes. Objective To study guideline-led prescribing in an Irish outpatient HF population. Setting Cardiology Outpatient Clinic, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Methods Guideline-led prescribing was assessed using the Guideline Adherence Index (GAI-3), that considered the prescribing of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers; beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The GAI-based target dose was calculated based on the prescription of ≥ 50% of the guideline-recommended target dose of each of the three GAI medications to HF patients with ejection fraction ≤ 40%. High-GAI was achieved by prescription of ≥ 2 GAI medicines. Potentially inappropriate prescribing was assessed using a HF-specific tool. Main outcome measure Heart failure guideline-led prescribing assessed using the GAI-3. Results A total of 127 HF patients, mean age 71.7 ± 13.1 years, were identified in the study. Seventy-one patients had ejection fraction ≤ 40%. Population mean GAI-3 was 65.8%. When contraindications to therapy are considered, the adjusted GAI-3 increased to 72.9%. The target dose GAI was 18.5%. High-GAI management was prescribed to 54 patients (76.1%). A potentially inappropriate medicine in HF was prescribed to 14 (19.7%) patients. Conclusion Most HF patients with ejection fraction ≤ 40% in this setting received optimal guideline-led prescribing however the proportion of patients achieving the target doses of these agents was suboptimal

Assessment of Knowledge, Awareness of Stroke, and the Factors Associated with Among Jordanian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

This study aims to assess the knowledge and awareness about stroke among the Jordanian population and determine factors associated with stroke awareness

Egyptian evidence-based consensus on clinical practice recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis

Abstract Background This work aims to develop clinical practice recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Results Fourteen expert panels had completed the two rounds of surveys. After the end of round 2, recommendations were released and distributed on 11 domains. The percentage of the agreement on the recommendations was 92.3% to 100%. All 11 key questions were answered at the end of the second round with agreement. Conclusion This guideline tried to tackle the gaps in research that limit treatment options. Stratifying the patients according to their disease domains has helped to set up sequential management pathways for each domain