Final report - Oslo Operational Pilot: Vulkan Car Parking, Oslo, Norway

This report provides a final report of the SEEV4-City Operational Pilot at the Vulkan parking garage in Oslo, Norway. It is part of a collection of reports published by the project covering a variation of specific and crosscutting analysis and evaluation perspectives and spans across 6 operational pilots. This report is dedicated to the analysis of the pilot itself

SEEV4-City approach to KPI Methodology

SEEV4-City is an innovation project funded by the EU Interreg North Sea Region Programme. Its main objective is to demonstrate smart electric mobility and renewable energy solutions integration and share its learnings. The project must report on the results of 6 Operational Pilots (OPs) of the following three Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): A. Estimated CO2 reduction B. Estimated increase in energy autonomy C. Estimated Saving from Grid Investment Deferral The project aimed to establish a common methodology to calculate the contributions to the three main KPIs with significant level of detail and accuracy (where feasible). This was a collaborative exercise between Work package (WP) partners leading WP3-Intelligence (Data analysis, monitoring and simulation), WP4- Operational Pilots Implementation and Coordination and WP5-Policy and Business Case work packages and was done in consultation with the OP partners. The result of this effort is collated in this defined approach the KPI Methodology report. It is part of a collection of reports published by the project covering a variation of specific and cross-cutting analysis as well as different evaluation perspectives spanning the 6 operational pilots

Final report - Leicester City Hall Operational Pilot: V2B and V2G at Leicester City Hall – case study

This report provides evaluation of the SEEV4-City Operational Pilot at Leicester City Hall, in the city of Leicester, U.K. In cooperation with Cenex UK, a demonstration project was set up to evaluate the technical requirements and commercial benefits of V2B (Vehicle to Building) technology at Leicester City Hall, U.K. It is part of a collection of reports published by the project covering a variation of specific and cross-cutting analysis and evaluation perspectives and spans 6 operational pilots. This report is dedicated to the analysis of the pilot itself

Vehicle4 Energy Services (V4ES) Evaluation for Upscaling and Transnational potential: Assessing the potential of further roll-out of 8 differing V4(ES) solutions

This report is intended to collect, present, and evaluate the various solutions applied in individual operational pilots for their (upscaling and transnational transfer) potential, in terms of opportunities and barriers, over the short and long(er)-term. This is done by identifying the main characteristics of the solutions and sites and the relevant influencing factors at different local (dimension) contexts. The analysis provides insights in barriers but also opportunities and conditions for success across four main dimensions that make up the local context landscape. We consider two main roll-out scenarios: 1. Upscaling within the boundaries of the country where the operational pilot (OP) took place 2. Transnational Transfer relates to the potential for transferring a (V4)ES solution to any of the other three (project) countries There are several aspects within the four main dimensions that are cross-cutting for all four countries, either because EU legislation lies at its roots, or because market conditions are fairly similar for certain influencing factors in those dimension. Ultimately, both Smart Charging and V2X market are still in their relevant infancies. The solutions applied in various SEEV4-City pilots are relatively straightforward and simple in ‘smartness’. This helps the potential for adoption but may not always be the optimal solution yet. The Peak shaving or load/demand shifting solutions are viable options to reduce costs for different stakeholders in the (electricity) supply chain. The market is likely to mature and become much smarter in coming 5 – 10 years. This also includes the evolvement (or spin-offs) of the solutions applied in SEEV4-_City as well. At least in the coming (approximately) 5 years Smart Charging appears to have the better financial business case and potential for large scale roll-out with less (impactful) bottlenecks, but looking at longer term V2X holds its potential to play a significant role in the energy transition. A common denominator as primary barriers relates to existing regulation, standards readiness and limited market availability of either hardware or service offerings. SEEV4-City has published a significant collection of varying reports, many taking a specific focus. For more detailed information on, for example a particular solution at one of the OPs or more in-depth policy evaluation, please look into these additional reports. They can be found through the Interreg NSR or project specific website, or one of the partners of the project would be glad to provide them

Final report – Loughborough Operational Pilot: Loughborough V2H Operational Pilot Final report with extension of Burton-upon-Trent with V2G application

This is the final report of the SEEV4-City Operational Pilot (OP) in Loughborough and its second phase in Burton-upon-Trent, UK. It is part of a collection of reports published by the Smart, clean Energy and Electric Vehicles for the City (SEEV4-City) Project

An Analysis of Some Proposed Tests of Rigidity

This study was designed to determine reliabilities of tests of rigidity and to increase these. Toward this end two preliminary studies were conducted.A number of tests were scored for creative effort by the ratio X/Y where X is the score for a familiar task and Y is the score for a similar but unfamiliar task.By using the inverse of this ratio, Y/X, the reliability of several of the tests was increased.A ratio of the time required to write a word first forward, then backward, was more reliable than a ratio of the number of words written first forward for a given period of time, then backward for the same time. A battery of tests was given to 89 high school senior boys and girls. Tests which had a reliability of .45 or above were included in a factor analysis study.Three factors were computed by the centroid method.After rotation, Factor A seemed to represent an ability to shift from one response to another or to change from one “set” to another.Factor B represented a speed of reaction, more specifically, a speed of performing an unfamiliar task.Eventually this factor may subdivide into a speed of perception and speed of motor performance.Factor C was specific to Writing Words tests. It may represent the ability to reverse a normal motor response. Two aspects of rigidity as determined by this study are the speed of reaction of the individual and the ability to change from one set to another. A factor representing an ability to change set found in tests based on the creative effort principle adds to the feasibility of employing mental act phenomena for the study of rigidity. Advisor: Don W. Dysinge