The yeast three-hybrid system : a method for detecting ligand-protein interactions

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemistry, 1996.Includes bibliographical references.by Edward J. Licitra.Ph.D

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) for treatment of second-line (2L) transplant noneligible (TNE) relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): Updated results from the PILOT study.

Background: Patients (pts) with aggressive large B-cell NHL who are R/R after first-line immunochemotherapy and not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT have a poor prognosis and no established standard of care. The ongoing, open-label phase 2 PILOT study is the first to assess the safety and efficacy of liso-cel, an investigational, CD19-directed, defined composition, 4-1BB CAR T cell product infused at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells, as 2L therapy in TNE pts (NCT03483103). Methods: Eligible pts had aggressive R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma NOS (de novo or transformed follicular lymphoma [FL]), high-grade B-cell lymphoma, or FL grade 3B with 1 line of prior therapy containing an anthracycline and anti-CD20 agent. Pts were deemed TNE by meeting ≥1 criteria: age ≥70 y, ECOG PS 2, or impaired organ function (DLCO ≤60% [but SaO2 ≥92% and CTCAE ≤1 dyspnea], LVEF ≥40% to \u3c 50%, creatinine clearance \u3e 30 to \u3c 60 mL/min, or AST/ALT \u3e 2 to ≤5 × ULN). Liso-cel (100 × 106 CAR+ T cells) was administered 2–7 days after lymphodepletion (LD) with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint is ORR; key secondary endpoints are AEs and CR rate. Results: At data cutoff, 25 pts had LD followed by liso-cel infusion. Pt characteristics are summarized in the Table. Overall, 48% (n = 12) had high tumor burden and 48% were primary refractory. 18/25 (72%) pts had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs, 40% of which were cytopenias. No grade 5 AEs occurred within the first 30 days after liso-cel. Five pts (20%) had cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 3 (12%) had neurological events (NEs). No grade 3/4 CRS was observed; 2 pts (8%) had grade 3/4 NEs. Five pts (20%) received tocilizumab and/or dexamethasone for CRS/NEs. At a median follow-up of 3.5 mo, the ORR was 80% (95% CI, 59–93; n = 20); 48% of pts (n = 12) achieved CR. Conclusions: These interim data suggest that elderly and/or comorbid pts with R/R aggressive large B-cell NHL, who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT, can receive 2L liso-cel with similar safety and efficacy to 3L+ pts as previously reported (Abramson, ASH 2019 #241). Updated data with longer follow-up will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03483103

Outpatient treatment with lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) across a variety of clinical sites from three ongoing clinical studies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).

Background: Currently approved CAR T cell therapies are generally administered as inpatient (inpt) treatment at university medical centers due to concerns about frequency, onset, severity, and management of AEs, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NEs). We sought to characterize whether patients (pts) could be safely monitored in the outpatient (outpt) setting after receiving liso-cel, an investigational, CD19-directed CAR T cell product administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells, across university and non-university sites in TRANSCEND NHL 001 (NCT02631044), OUTREACH (NCT03744676), and PILOT (NCT03483103). Methods: Eligible pts had R/R LBCL after systemic chemoimmunotherapy; moderately impaired organ function was allowed. For outpt infusion of liso-cel, pts were required to receive safety monitoring education, have a caregiver and stay within 1 h travel to site of care for 30 d post-treatment. All study sites had a multidisciplinary CAR T cell team and standard operating procedures for toxicity monitoring and management. Results: At data cutoff, 53 pts had received liso-cel on Study Day 1 and were monitored as outpts (university, n = 33; non-university, n = 20), including pts ≥65 y of age (n = 23) and with high tumor burden (SPD ≥50 cm2; n = 16). Any grade CRS and NEs were reported in 18 (34%) and 14 pts (26%), respectively. Severe CRS and/or NEs occurred in only 2 pts (4%) and were reversible. Median (range) time to onset of CRS and NEs was 5 (2–9) and 8.5 (3–22) d, respectively. Tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids for treatment of CRS and/or NEs were required in 8 pts (15%). Overall, 30 pts (57%) required hospitalization post-treatment, with a median (range) time to hospitalization post-treatment of 5.5 (2–22) d; 9 pts (17%) were hospitalized Study Day 4 or earlier. Two pts required ICU-level care. There were no grade 5 treatment-emergent AEs. Safety in pts monitored as outpts was comparable across types of sites. Overall response rate was 81% (95% CI, 68–91). Safety and efficacy were consistent with data from inpts across the 3 studies (N = 270). Conclusions: Pts with R/R LBCL were successfully treated with liso-cel and monitored for CAR T cell-related toxicity in the outpt setting across different types of sites. Incidences of severe CRS, NEs, and early hospitalization were low; 43% of pts did not require hospitalization. A larger dataset will be presented, including comparisons of outpts vs inpts and sites of care. Clinical trial information: NCT02631044 (TRANSCEND NHL 001), NCT03744676 (OUTREACH), NCT03483103 (PILOT)

ESMO / ASCO Recommendations for a Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology Edition 2016

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) are publishing a new edition of the ESMO/ ASCO Global Curriculum (GC) thanks to contribution of 64 ESMOappointed and 32 ASCO-appointed authors. First published in 2004 and updated in 2010, the GC edition 2016 answers to the need for updated recommendations for the training of physicians in medical oncology by defining the standard to be fulfilled to qualify as medical oncologists. At times of internationalisation of healthcare and increased mobility of patients and physicians, the GC aims to provide state-of-the-art cancer care to all patients wherever they live. Recent progress in the field of cancer research has indeed resulted in diagnostic and therapeutic innovations such as targeted therapies as a standard therapeutic approach or personalised cancer medicine specialised training for medical oncology trainees. Thus, several new chapters on technical contents such as molecular pathology, translational research or molecular imaging and on conceptual attitudes towards human principles like genetic counselling or survivorship have been integrated in the GC. The GC edition 2016 consists of 12 sections with 17 subsections, 44 chapters and 35 subchapters, respectively. Besides renewal in its contents, the GC underwent a principal formal change taking into consideration modern didactic principles. It is presented in a template-based format that subcategorises the detailed outcome requirements into learning objectives, awareness, knowledge and skills. Consecutive steps will be those of harmonising and implementing teaching and assessment strategies