Helping the Working Poor: Employer- vs. Employee-Based Subsidies

In the United States and Europe there has been renewed interest in subsidizing firms that employ disadvantaged workers as a means of addressing poverty and other social problems. In contrast, the prevailing practice is largely to provide social welfare benefits directly to individuals. Which approach is better? We re-examine the relative merits of employee- versus employer-based labor market subsidies and conclude there are good reasons to continue to rely on the direct, employee-based approach. In practice, low-wage workers are seldom either low-skill or low-income workers. Furthermore, workers who might quality for a firm-based subsidy are reluctant to so identify themselves for fear of being stigmatized or labeled as needy. Thus, employer-based subsidy programs have lower participation rates and correspondingly higher per capita expenditures than employee-based subsidy programs

The Astropy Problem

The Astropy Project (http://astropy.org) is, in its own words, "a community effort to develop a single core package for Astronomy in Python and foster interoperability between Python astronomy packages." For five years this project has been managed, written, and operated as a grassroots, self-organized, almost entirely volunteer effort while the software is used by the majority of the astronomical community. Despite this, the project has always been and remains to this day effectively unfunded. Further, contributors receive little or no formal recognition for creating and supporting what is now critical software. This paper explores the problem in detail, outlines possible solutions to correct this, and presents a few suggestions on how to address the sustainability of general purpose astronomical software

Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled trial

© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Background: In women with late preterm pre-eclampsia, the optimal time to initiate delivery is unclear because limitation of maternal disease progression needs to be balanced against infant complications. The aim of this trial was to determine whether planned earlier initiation of delivery reduces maternal adverse outcomes without substantial worsening of neonatal or infant outcomes, compared with expectant management (usual care) in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia. Methods: In this parallel-group, non-masked, multicentre, randomised controlled trial done in 46 maternity units across England and Wales, we compared planned delivery versus expectant management (usual care) with individual randomisation in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia from 34 to less than 37 weeks' gestation and a singleton or dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy. The co-primary maternal outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity or recorded systolic blood pressure of at least 160 mm Hg with a superiority hypothesis. The co-primary perinatal outcome was a composite of perinatal deaths or neonatal unit admission up to infant hospital discharge with a non-inferiority hypothesis (non-inferiority margin of 10% difference in incidence). Analyses were by intention to treat, together with a per-protocol analysis for the perinatal outcome. The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN01879376. The trial is closed to recruitment but follow-up is ongoing. Findings: Between Sept 29, 2014, and Dec 10, 2018, 901 women were recruited. 450 women (448 women and 471 infants analysed) were allocated to planned delivery and 451 women (451 women and 475 infants analysed) to expectant management. The incidence of the co-primary maternal outcome was significantly lower in the planned delivery group (289 [65%] women) compared with the expectant management group (338 [75%] women; adjusted relative risk 0·86, 95% CI 0·79–0·94; p=0·0005). The incidence of the co-primary perinatal outcome by intention to treat was significantly higher in the planned delivery group (196 [42%] infants) compared with the expectant management group (159 [34%] infants; 1·26, 1·08–1·47; p=0·0034). The results from the per-protocol analysis were similar. There were nine serious adverse events in the planned delivery group and 12 in the expectant management group. Interpretation: There is strong evidence to suggest that planned delivery reduces maternal morbidity and severe hypertension compared with expectant management, with more neonatal unit admissions related to prematurity but no indicators of greater neonatal morbidity. This trade-off should be discussed with women with late preterm pre-eclampsia to allow shared decision making on timing of delivery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme

Comparison of sedimentary iron speciation obtained by sequential extraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy

Iron (Fe) speciation in marine sediments and suspended particulate matter (SPM) are widely used to investigate the role of Fe minerals in marine biogeochemical cycling and to reconstruct paleo-redox conditions. A traditional method for the determination of Fe speciation are sequential extractions, in which operationally defined Fe pools are dissolved by specific extraction solutions. More recently, many studies make use of synchrotron radiation-based X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES), especially if little sample material is available or a high spatial resolution is required. However, few studies have systematically compared Fe speciation obtained by the two methods. Here, we report Fe speciation for marine sediments (both wet and freeze-dried) and SPM from contrasting marine environments (western Baltic Sea and Amazon shelf) obtained by sequential extraction and XANES. The two methods yield comparable results regarding the approximate proportion of reactive Fe ((oxyhydr)oxides, carbonate and sulfide minerals) in the total Fe pool and the extent to which reactive Fe minerals have been converted to pyrite. However, methodological issues associated with both approaches complicate a direct comparison of specific mineral groups. Pyrite concentrations obtained by XANES are lower than those obtained by extraction, which is attributed to an underestimation by XANES due to self-absorption effects and an overestimation by the chromium reduction method due to dissolution of reduced sulfur phases that are not associated with Fe. As substantial amounts of pyrite are oxidized during freeze-drying and sample storage, we recommend to analyze wet sediments in modern marine environments. The XANES spectra of Fe (oxyhydr)oxide and Fe(III)-containing (ferric) clay minerals are similar, which is why these components cannot be differentiated by XANES. Similarly, sequential extraction schemes are known to dissolve a variable proportion of ferric clay minerals along with Fe carbonates and Fe (oxyhydr)oxides. Further investigating the role of ferric clay minerals in the low-temperature marine Fe cycle may therefore require the use of additional methods. Our findings may help to assess the transferability of XANES-based Fe speciation for small sediment and SPM samples to those reported in more traditional studies on Fe biogeochemical cycling and paleo-redox conditions