Large-scale external validation and comparison of prognostic models: an application to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background: External validations and comparisons of prognostic models or scores are a prerequisite for their use in routine clinical care but are lacking in most medical fields including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our aim was to externally validate and concurrently compare prognostic scores for 3-year all-cause mortality in mostly multimorbid patients with COPD. Methods: We relied on 24 cohort studies of the COPD Cohorts Collaborative International Assessment consortium, corresponding to primary, secondary, and tertiary care in Europe, the Americas, and Japan. These studies include globally 15,762 patients with COPD (1871 deaths and 42,203 person years of follow-up). We used network meta-analysis adapted to multiple score comparison (MSC), following a frequentist two-stage approach; thus, we were able to compare all scores in a single analytical framework accounting for correlations among scores within cohorts. We assessed transitivity, heterogeneity, and inconsistency and provided a performance ranking of the prognostic scores. Results: Depending on data availability, between two and nine prognostic scores could be calculated for each cohort. The BODE score (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity) had a median area under the curve (AUC) of 0.679 [1st quartile–3rd quartile = 0.655–0.733] across cohorts. The ADO score (age, dyspnea, and airflow obstruction) showed the best performance for predicting mortality (difference AUCADO – AUCBODE = 0.015 [95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.002 to 0.032]; p = 0.08) followed by the updated BODE (AUCBODE updated – AUCBODE = 0.008 [95% CI = −0.005 to +0.022]; p = 0.23). The assumption of transitivity was not violated. Heterogeneity across direct comparisons was small, and we did not identify any local or global inconsistency.La lista completa de autores puede verse en el archivo asociado.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Detección de isquemia silente en pacientes hipotiroideos con estudios de perfusión miocárdica nuclear

En la evaluación de los procesos subclínicos de ateroesclerosis se realizan estudios para la detección de isquemia silente (IS) en pacientes hipotiroideos asintomáticos intentando identificar grupos de riesgo. El objetivo de este trabajo es detectar con estudios de perfusión miocárdica spect gatillado (GS) la presencia de isquemia silente, cuantificando la severidad y extensión en población hipotiroidea.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Detección de isquemia silente en pacientes hipotiroideos con estudios de perfusión miocárdica nuclear

En la evaluación de los procesos subclínicos de ateroesclerosis se realizan estudios para la detección de isquemia silente (IS) en pacientes hipotiroideos asintomáticos intentando identificar grupos de riesgo. El objetivo de este trabajo es detectar con estudios de perfusión miocárdica spect gatillado (GS) la presencia de isquemia silente, cuantificando la severidad y extensión en población hipotiroidea.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Detección de isquemia silente en pacientes hipotiroideos con estudios de perfusión miocárdica nuclear

En la evaluación de los procesos subclínicos de ateroesclerosis se realizan estudios para la detección de isquemia silente (IS) en pacientes hipotiroideos asintomáticos intentando identificar grupos de riesgo. El objetivo de este trabajo es detectar con estudios de perfusión miocárdica spect gatillado (GS) la presencia de isquemia silente, cuantificando la severidad y extensión en población hipotiroidea.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Lack of systemic oxidative stress during PAF challenge in mild asthma

SummaryTo further establish the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of acute bronchial asthma, we investigated the effects of platelet-activating factor (PAF) challenge on systemic oxidant–antioxidant balance in 12 asthmatic patients (age, 25±3[sem] yr; FEV1, 95±10% predicted), using a double blinded, controlled with Lyso-PAF (L-PAF), cross-over design.Respiratory system resistance (Rrs), arterial blood gases, peripheral blood neutrophils and oxidant–antioxidant balance, including thiobarbituric acid (TBA)-malondialdehyde (MDA) adducts, protein sulphydryls and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), were assessed at baseline and 5, 15 and 45min after PAF and L-PAF (18μg each) bronchoprovocation. Urinary leukotriene E4 (uLTE4) elimination was measured 120min after challenge.Compared with baseline, as expected, PAF increased significantly Rrs and AaPO2 and decreased PaO2 and peripheral blood neutrophils along with a rebound neutrophilia and increased uLTE4. By contrast, markers of systemic oxidative stress remained unaltered throughout the study. Unlike PAF, L-PAF-induced changes were negligible.We conclude that there is no systemic oxidant–antioxidant imbalance during acute bronchoconstriction induced by PAF in these patients with mild asthma

Add-on inhaled budesonide in the treatment of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 : a randomised clinical trial

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been extremely effective to reduce the incidence of severe COVID19 [1-3], but effective and safe treatments of the acute infection are still limited [4, 5]. An uncontrolled pulmonary inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 is considered a key pathogenic mechanism of COVID19 progression [6], so systemic dexamethasone is recommended in severe cases [5, 7]. On the other hand, in very mild patients at home inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may prevent disease progression [8-11]. Whether ICS prevent disease progression too in patients hospitalised because of COVID19 has not been explored before. Accordingly, we designed an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised clinical trial (RCT) to explore the efficacy of adding inhaled budesonide to usual care to prevent disease progression in patients hospitalised because of COVID19 pneumonia. We also monitored carefully the safety of this intervention since there are concerns about the use of systemic corticosteroids in other viral (influenza) lung infections [12]

Mortality prediction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease comparing the GOLD 2015 and GOLD 2019 staging: a pooled analysis of individual patient data

In 2019, The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) modified the grading system for patients with COPD, creating 16 subgroups (1A–4D). As part of the COPD Cohorts Collaborative International Assessment (3CIA) initiative, we aim to compare the mortality prediction of the 2015 and 2019 COPD GOLD staging systems. We studied 17 139 COPD patients from the 3CIA study, selecting those with complete data. Patients were classified by the 2015 and 2019 GOLD ABCD systems, and we compared the predictive ability for 5-year mortality of both classifications. In total, 17 139 patients with COPD were enrolled in 22 cohorts from 11 countries between 2003 and 2017; 8823 of them had complete data and were analysed. Mean±sd age was 63.9±9.8 years and 62.9% were male. GOLD 2019 classified the patients in milder degrees of COPD. For both classifications, group D had higher mortality. 5-year mortality did not differ between groups B and C in GOLD 2015; in GOLD 2019, mortality was greater for group B than C. Patients classified as group A and B had better sensitivity and positive predictive value with the GOLD 2019 classification than GOLD 2015. GOLD 2015 had better sensitivity for group C and D than GOLD 2019. The area under the curve values for 5-year mortality were only 0.67 (95% CI 0.66–0.68) for GOLD 2015 and 0.65 (95% CI 0.63–0.66) for GOLD 2019

Large-scale external validation and comparison of prognostic models: an application to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background: External validations and comparisons of prognostic models or scores are a prerequisite for their use in routine clinical care but are lacking in most medical fields including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our aim was to externally validate and concurrently compare prognostic scores for 3-year all-cause mortality in mostly multimorbid patients with COPD. Methods: We relied on 24 cohort studies of the COPD Cohorts Collaborative International Assessment consortium, corresponding to primary, secondary, and tertiary care in Europe, the Americas, and Japan. These studies include globally 15,762 patients with COPD (1871 deaths and 42,203 person years of follow-up). We used network meta-analysis adapted to multiple score comparison (MSC), following a frequentist two-stage approach; thus, we were able to compare all scores in a single analytical framework accounting for correlations among scores within cohorts. We assessed transitivity, heterogeneity, and inconsistency and provided a performance ranking of the prognostic scores. Results: Depending on data availability, between two and nine prognostic scores could be calculated for each cohort. The BODE score (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity) had a median area under the curve (AUC) of 0.679 [1st quartile-3rd quartile = 0.655-0.733] across cohorts. The ADO score (age, dyspnea, and airflow obstruction) showed the best performance for predicting mortality (difference AUC(ADO) - AUC(BODE) = 0.015 [95% confidence interval (CI) = - 0.002 to 0.032]; p = 0.08) followed by the updated BODE (AUCBODE updated - AUCBODE = 0.008 [95% CI = -0.005 to +0.022]; p = 0.23). The assumption of transitivity was not violated. Heterogeneity across direct comparisons was small, and we did not identify any local or global inconsistency. Conclusions: Our analyses showed best discriminatory performance for the ADO and updated BODE scores in patients with COPD. A limitation to be addressed in future studies is the extension of MSC network meta-analysis to measures of calibration. MSC network meta-analysis can be applied to prognostic scores in any medical field to identify the best scores, possibly paving the way for stratified medicine, public health, and research

Large-scale external validation and comparison of prognostic models: an application to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background: External validations and comparisons of prognostic models or scores are a prerequisite for their use in routine clinical care but are lacking in most medical fields including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our aim was to externally validate and concurrently compare prognostic scores for 3-year all-cause mortality in mostly multimorbid patients with COPD. Methods: We relied on 24 cohort studies of the COPD Cohorts Collaborative International Assessment consortium, corresponding to primary, secondary, and tertiary care in Europe, the Americas, and Japan. These studies include globally 15,762 patients with COPD (1871 deaths and 42,203 person years of follow-up). We used network meta-analysis adapted to multiple score comparison (MSC), following a frequentist two-stage approach; thus, we were able to compare all scores in a single analytical framework accounting for correlations among scores within cohorts. We assessed transitivity, heterogeneity, and inconsistency and provided a performance ranking of the prognostic scores. Results: Depending on data availability, between two and nine prognostic scores could be calculated for each cohort. The BODE score (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity) had a median area under the curve (AUC) of 0.679 [1st quartile–3rd quartile = 0.655–0.733] across cohorts. The ADO score (age, dyspnea, and airflow obstruction) showed the best performance for predicting mortality (difference AUCADO – AUCBODE = 0.015 [95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.002 to 0.032]; p = 0.08) followed by the updated BODE (AUCBODE updated – AUCBODE = 0.008 [95% CI = −0.005 to +0.022]; p = 0.23). The assumption of transitivity was not violated. Heterogeneity across direct comparisons was small, and we did not identify any local or global inconsistency.La lista completa de autores puede verse en el archivo asociado.Facultad de Ciencias Médica