15 research outputs found
Isotopic evidence for the spatial heterogeneity of the planktonic food webs in the transition zone between river and lake ecosystems
Resources and organisms in food webs are distributed patchily. The spatial structure of food webs is important and critical to understanding their overall structure. However, there is little available information about the small-scale spatial structure of food webs. We investigated the spatial structure of food webs in a lake ecosystem at the littoral transition zone between an inflowing river and a lake. We measured the carbon isotope ratios of zooplankton and particulate organic matter (POM; predominantly phytoplankton) in the littoral zone of a saline lake. Parallel changes in the Ξ΄ 13C values of zooplankton and their respective POMs indicated that there is spatial heterogeneity of the food web in this study area. Lake ecosystems are usually classified at the landscape level as either pelagic or littoral habitats. However, we showed small-scale spatial heterogeneity among planktonic food webs along an environmental gradient. Stable isotope data is useful for detecting spatial heterogeneity of habitats, populations, communities, and ecosystems
Intraspecific structure of the Coregonus lavaretus complex in water bodies of Siberia: a case of postglacial allopatric origin of Yukagirian whitefish
The results of morphological and genetic analyses of forms/species of the Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (Gmelin, 1789) complex from the Indigirka and Kolyma river basins are presented in the context of there being recent postglacial speciation events. It has been found that the studied whitefishes belong to the sparsely rakered and low lateral-line forms and have previously been described as Coregonus lavaretus pidschian n. jucagiricus Drjagin (Berg), 1932. Based on these characters, this whitefish does not differ from most Arctic whitefish populations (in particular from Coregonus lavaretus glacialis Kirillov, 1972). Analysis of variability of the ND1 gene (mtDNA) showed that whitefishes from the Indigirka and Kolyma basins belong to a distant phylogenetic lineage, which is significantly different from all previously studied whitefish lineages from the Ob, Yenisei, Lena, Anadyr, and Amur river basins. Analysis of variability of the ITS1 fragment (nDNA) showed that all studied forms/species (from Ob River to Amur River basins), including C. l. pidschian n. jucagiricus, have a tandem arrangement of two identical nucleotide fragments and very similar nucleotide composition of the ITS1 region. Based on contemporary data, this phylogenetic lineage of the C. pidschian complex could be considered a young postglacial allopatric species.info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersio
Mitochondrial Lineage Diversity and Phylogeography of Daphnia (Daphnia) (Crustacea: Cladocera) in North-East Russia
The variability of the 12S gene fragment of the mtDNA for taxa belonging to subgenus Daphnia (Daphnia) O.F. Müller, 1776 (Crustacea: Cladocera) in NE Russia is studied, and their phylogenetic analysis performed. We identified (based both on morphological and molecular data) nine species belonging to four species complexes, namely: (A) D. longispina s.l.: (1) D. longispina O.F. Müller, 1776; (2) D. dentifera Forbes, 1893; (3) D. galeata Sars, 1864; (4) D. umbra Taylor, Hebert et Colbourne, 1996; (B) D. cristata s.l.: (5) D. cristata Sars, 1862; (6) D. longiremis Sars, 1862; (C) D. curvirostris s.l.: (7) D. curvirostris Eylmann, 1887; (D) D. pulex s.l.: (8) D. pulex Leydig, 1860; (9) D. middendorffiana Fischer, 1851. Rare arcto-mountainous taxon D. umbra was found in the mountains of the Sakha (Yakutia) Republic for the first time. Species diversity in NE Asia is relatively low, and the most revealed taxa are trans-Beringian. We also performed a phylogeographic analysis of D. dentifera and D. pulex s.l., the two most common species in NE Russia. Our new data allow us to assume that the daphniids of NE Asia have undergone various evolutionary scenarios during the Pleistocene period: survival is within some local refugia, and re-colonization from these areas and from North America through the Beringian land bridge, etc. We agree with previous authors who revealed that the patterns in the studied species groups are relatively recent (of Late Pleistocene or even Holocene age), although the main phylogenetic daphniid lineages (mainly congruent with the biological species) are very old. Our results provide convincing evidence for the hypothesis that NE Russia is a very important source of modern haplotypic diversity for the cladocerans
Redescription of Daphnia turbinata Sars, 1903 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Daphniidae)
Zuykova, Elena I., Sheveleva, Natalia G., Kotov, Alexey A. (2019): Redescription of Daphnia turbinata Sars, 1903 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Daphniidae). Zootaxa 4658 (2): 317-330, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4658.2.
Spatial changes in carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes of the plankton food web in a saline lake ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 571: 395β400
Abstract We investigated spatial changes in the isotope ratios of the plankton food web in Lake Chany, Siberia, Russia, especially at an estuarine transition zone of the lake. The d 13 C values of particulate organic matter (POM) varied among the sampling sites, and increased with increasing pH of the lake water. This may reflect a shift by phytoplankton from using CO 2 to using bicarbonate for photosynthesis with increasing pH. The d 13 C values of zooplankton community also changed at each site along with those of the POM. This was indicative of carbon isotope changes of plankton food webs between the stations along an environmental gradient
Unexpected endemism in the Daphnia longispina complex (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Southern Siberia.
The biological significance of regional cladoceran morphotypes in the montane regions of the central Palearctic remains poorly understood. In the Holarctic Daphnia longispina complex (Cladocera: Daphniidae), several variants, lineages and species have been proposed as endemic for Southern Siberia. Daphnia turbinata Sars, for example, named after its unusual head shape, is known only from Southern Siberia. Here we sequence DNA of Daphnia from three mitochondrial genes (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2, ND2) from 57 localities in Russia and Mongolia (the majority being from Southern Siberia) and place them in evolutionary context with existing data. Our aim was to examine regional endemism of the Daphnia longispina complex in Southern Siberian; to improve the phylogenetic understanding with improved taxonomic and regional sampling, and to better understand the influence of Pleistocene glaciation on the biogeography of these lineages. At least three lineages showed genetic evidence for endemism in Southern Siberia. There was strong support for D. turbinata as a sister lineage to to D. longispina/D. dentifera. Another endemic, Siberian D. cf. longispina, is a sister group to the longispina group in general. Within D. longispina s. str. there was an endemic Siberian clade with a western range boundary near the Yenisei River Basin. Gene flow estimates among populations (based on FST values) were very low for clades of D. longispina on a regional (the original 12S dataset), and on a pan-Eurasian (the extended 12S dataset) scale. Negative values of Fu's FS and Tajima's D tests prevailed for the species examined with significant values found for two D. longispina clades, D. dentifera, D. galeata and D. cristata. Our results support the notion that Southern Siberia is an important biogeographic region for cladocerans as it contained unexpected diversity of endemics (such as D. turbinata, D. cf. longispina and lineages of D. umbra and D. longsipina s.str.) and from being the geographic meeting place of expanding postglacial lineages from eastern and western refugia
Morphological Differentiation, Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Variability Between Geographically Distant Populations of Daphnia galeata and Daphnia cucullata (Anomopoda, Daphniidae)
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Ρ. Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
, ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π·Π°ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 ΠΈ Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862
(Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΠ°Π»ΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡ - ΠΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΠ²Π° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ,
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ) ΠΈ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ, ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ).
ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ². Π‘Π°ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Ρ, ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ
Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ³Π»Ρ. Π Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π°
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ 16S ΠΈ 12S Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ITS2 ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ.
ΠΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ D. galeata ΠΈ D. cucullata Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ
Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅.Although members of genus Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) are the most common water
invertebrates and are considered as model organisms for many taxonomic, ecological and
evolutionary studies their systematics remains unresolved. Here, morphological differentiation
and genetic polymorphism between the geographically distant populations of the sister species
Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 and Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862 in the Curonian Lagoon, a large
shallow freshwater lagoon of the Baltic Sea (Russia, Kaliningrad Oblast) and Novosibirsk Reservoir
(Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast) are presented. The divergence between species and their populations
was analyzed based on traditional morphological traits and a large set of morphometric traits
describing the body shape. The traits describing the shape of head and helmet, and spine were the
most variable morphological characters. Phylogenetic relationships between species and populations
were constructed based on variation in mitochondrial 16S and 12S rRNA genes and nuclear ITS2
rDNA sequences. The mitochondrial DNA divergence between D. galeata and D. cucullata species
was significant and reflected their monophyletic origin, whereas intraspecific genetic distances are
estimated as insignificant
Evidence of dispersal between the Yenisei and the Lena river basins during the late Pleistocene within the whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus pidschian) complex
The Coregonus lavaretus (Linnaeus, 1758) complex is a morphologically and genetically diverse group of whitefish. Its taxonomic structure has been controversial for almost a century. At least 25 forms of C. lavaretus have been described in Siberia, but there is still no consensus on their intraspecific structure and taxonomy. Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (Gmelin, 1789) was described as a subspecies of C. lavaretus. Recently, it was assumed that this subspecies is also a complex. The purpose of this study was to compare the distributions of pidschian-like whitefish haplotypes in two basins of large Siberian rivers, Yenisei and Lena, and to assess the gene flow between basins of these rivers, which were connected after the last glaciation. The sequence of the following mitochondrial DNA genes, 16S rRNA (partial), tRNA-Leu (full), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (full), tRNA-Ile (full), and tRNA-Gln (partial), were used for the inference of intraspecific genetic structure of C. l. pidschian. Whitefish haplotypes were clustered into two groups according to their distribution between two large Siberian river basins; however, there were shared haplotypes indicating events of migration and hybridization, which could occur when Bolshoi Yenisei and Lena river systems were connected after the last glaciation (the Late Pleistocene).info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersio