Immunisation coverage and annual report National Immunisation Programme in the Netherlands 2016

Het RIVM beschrijft jaarlijks de ontwikkelingen binnen het Rijksvaccinatieprogramma (RVP), zowel inhoudelijk als organisatorisch. Vanaf dit jaar zijn de belangrijkste gebeurtenissen en de ontwikkelingen op het gebied van de vaccinatiegraad gebundeld. Belangrijke gebeurtenissen In 2016 waren er geen opvallende uitbraken van RVP-ziekten. Wel stijgt sinds oktober 2015 het aantal patiënten met meningokokkenziekte W, terwijl in het RVP tegen meningokokkenziekte C wordt ingeënt. Opvallend was het stevige debat dat in november 2016 in diverse media is gevoerd tussen voor- en tegenstanders van vaccinatie. Verder heeft het RIVM factsheets gemaakt voor zowel professionals als het publiek met informatie over vaccinaties tegen ziekten die wel beschikbaar zijn maar niet in het RVP zijn opgenomen. Voorbeelden zijn waterpokken, gordelroos en het rotavirus (www.rivm.nl/vaccinaties). Vaccinatiegraad De vaccinatiegraad, oftewel het aandeel zuigelingen, kleuters en schoolkinderen dat de vaccinaties uit het RVP krijgt, is nog steeds hoog. De vaccinatiegraad voor bof, mazelen en rodehond (BMR) daalt al een paar jaar licht. De norm van 95 procent van de Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie (WHO), die nodig is om mazelen uit te bannen, wordt in Nederland bij de eerste BMR-vaccinatie niet meer gehaald. Voor de tweede BMR-vaccinatie was dit al langer zo. Ook bij andere vaccinaties in het RVP is een lichte daling te zien. De deelname aan de HPV-vaccinatie tegen baarmoederhalskanker is voor het eerst afgenomen, van 61 naar 53 procent. Een hoge vaccinatiegraad zorgt ervoor dat kwetsbare en (nog) niet gevaccineerde kinderen tegen ziekten worden beschermd (groepsbescherming). Een dalende vaccinatiegraad vergroot de kans dat in de toekomst ziekten zoals mazelen uitbreken.The RIVM annually describes the developments within the Dutch National Immunisation Programme (NIP), both substantively and organisationally. From this year, the most important events and developments in the field of immunisation coverage have been bundled. Important events In 2016, there were no significant outbreaks of NIP diseases. However, since October 2015, the number of meningococcal disease patients by a different serogroup (W) than the serogroup C which is vaccinated against within the NIP, has risen. Striking was the vigorous debate that was conducted in various media in November 2016 between advocates and opponents of immunisation. Furthermore, the RIVM has made factsheets for professionals as well as the public with information on vaccines against diseases that are available but not included in the NIP. Examples include varicella, herpes zoster and rotavirus (www.rivm.nl/vaccinations). Immunisation coverage The immunisation coverage, i.e. the proportion of newborns, toddlers and schoolchildren who receive vaccinations within the NIP is still high. The immunisation coverage for mumps, measles and rubella (MMR) has declined slightly for a few years. The 95 per cent threshold of the World Health Organization (WHO) needed to eliminate measles is no longer achieved in the Netherlands for the first MMR vaccination. For the second MMR vaccination this has been for longer. Also for other NIP vaccinations there is a slight decrease in participation. The participation in HPV vaccination against cervical cancer has decreased for the first time, from 61 to 53 per cent. A high immunisation coverage ensures that vulnerable and not (yet) vaccinated children are protected against diseases (herd protection). A decreasing immunisation coverage increases the likelihood that diseases such as measles cause outbreaks in the future.Ministerie van VW

A phase I study of intravenous liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) in paediatric patients with relapsed or resistant solid tumours

Anthracyclines are widely used in paediatric oncology, but their use is limited by the risk of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Encapsulating anthracyclines in liposomes may reduce cardiac toxicity and possibly increase drug availability to tumours. A phase I study in paediatric patients was designed to establish the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after a single course of liposomal daunorubicin, ‘DaunoXome', as a 1 h infusion on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Patients were stratified into two groups according to prior treatment: Group A (conventional) and group B (heavily pretreated patients). Dose limiting toxicity was expected to be haematological, and a two-step escalation was planned, with and without G-CSF support. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in parallel. In all, 48 patients aged from 1 to 18 years were treated. Dose limiting toxicity was neutropenia for both groups. Maximum tolerated dose was defined as 155 mg m−2 for Group A and 100 mg m−2 for Group B. The second phase with G-CSF was interrupted because of evidence of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Cardiac toxicity was reported in a total of 15 patients in this study. DaunoXome shares the early cardiotoxicity of conventional anthracyclines in paediatric oncology. This study has successfully defined a haematological MTD for DaunoXome, but the significance of this is limited given the concerns of delayed cardiac toxicity. The importance of longer-term follow-up in patients enrolled into phase I studies has been underestimated previously, and may lead to an under-recognition of important adverse events

Patient-centric trials for therapeutic development in precision oncology

An enhanced understanding of the molecular pathology of disease gained from genomic studies is facilitating the development of treatments that target discrete molecular subclasses of tumours. Considerable associated challenges include how to advance and implement targeted drug-development strategies. Precision medicine centres on delivering the most appropriate therapy to a patient on the basis of clinical and molecular features of their disease. The development of therapeutic agents that target molecular mechanisms is driving innovation in clinical-trial strategies. Although progress has been made, modifications to existing core paradigms in oncology drug development will be required to realize fully the promise of precision medicine

Clinical benefit in Phase-I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: does dose matter?

Phase-I trials traditionally involve dose-escalation to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). With conventional chemotherapy, efficacy is generally deemed to be dose-dependent, but the same may not be applicable to molecularly targeted agents (MTAs). We analysed consecutive patients included in Phase-I trials at the Royal Marsden Hospital from 5 January 2005 to 6 June 2006. We considered only trials of monotherapy MTAs in which the MTD was defined. Three patient cohorts (A, B, and C) were identified according to the dose received as a percentage of the final trial MTD (0–33%, 34–65%, >66%). Potential efficacy was assessed using the non-progression rate (NPR), that is, complete/partial response or stable disease for at least 3 months by RECIST. A total of 135 patients having progressive disease before enrolment were analysed from 15 eligible trials. Median age was 57 years (20–86); male : female ratio was 1.8 : 1. Cohort A, B, and C included 28 (21%), 22 (16%), and 85 (63%) patients; NPR at 3 and 6 months was 21% and 11% (A), 50% and 27% (B), 31% and 14% (C), respectively, P=0.9. Median duration of non-progression (17 weeks; 95% CI=13–22) was not correlated with the MTD level, P=0.9. Our analysis suggests that the potential for clinical benefit is not confined to patients treated at doses close to the MTD in Phase-I trials of MTAs

A phase I dose-escalating study of DaunoXome, liposomal daunorubicin, in metastatic breast cancer

The aims of this phase I study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose, safety profile and activity of liposomal daunorubicin, DaunoXome (NeXstar Pharmaceuticals), in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. DaunoXome was administered intravenously over 2 h in 21 day cycles and doses were increased from 80 to 100, 120 and 150 mg m2. Sixteen patients were enrolled. A total of 70 cycles of DaunoXome were administered. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mg m2, the dose-limiting toxicity being prolonged grade 4 neutropenia or neutropenic pyrexia necessitating dose reductions at 120 and 150 mg m2. Asymptomatic cardiotoxicity was observed in three patients: grade 1 in one treated with a cumulative dose of 800 mg m2 and grade 2 in two, one who received a cumulative dose of 960 mg m2 and the other a cumulative dose of 600 mg m2 with a previous neoadjuvant doxorubicin chemotherapy of 300 mg m2. Tumour response was evaluable in 15 patients, of whom two had objective responses, six had stable disease and seven had progressive disease. In conclusion, DaunoXome is associated with mild, manageable toxicities and has anti-tumour activity in metastatic breast cancer. The findings support further phase II evaluation of DaunoXome alone and in combination with other standard non-anthracycline cytotoxic or novel targeted agents. Although the dose-limiting toxicity for DaunoXome was febrile neutropenia at 120 mg m2, we would recommend this dose for further evaluation, as the febrile neutropenia occurred after four or more cycles in three of the four episodes seen, was short lived and uncomplicated

Phase II study of single agent capecitabine in the treatment of metastatic non-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine the safety of single agent capecitabine, a pro-drug of 5FU, in patients with metastatic non-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). METHODS: Multicentre phase II, first-line study design. Oral capecitabine was administered on days 1-14 of 3-week cycles. RESULTS: Treatment was safe and well tolerated. Common toxicities were diarrhoea and fatigue. CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence to support the use of capecitabine as a substitute for infusional 5FU in the management of NETs

Expression of NDRG2 is down-regulated in high-risk adenomas and colorectal carcinoma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It has recently been shown that <it>NDRG2 </it>mRNA is down-regulated or undetectable in several human cancers and cancer cell-lines. Although the function of NDRG2 is unknown, high <it>NDRG2 </it>expression correlates with improved prognosis in high-grade gliomas. The aim of this study has been to examine <it>NDRG2 </it>mRNA expression in colon cancer. By examining affected and normal tissue from individuals with colorectal adenomas and carcinomas, as well as in healthy individuals, we aim to determine whether and at which stages <it>NDRG2 </it>down-regulation occurs during colonic carcinogenesis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using quantitative RT-PCR, we have determined the mRNA levels for <it>NDRG2 </it>in low-risk (n = 15) and high-risk adenomas (n = 57), colorectal carcinomas (n = 50) and corresponding normal tissue, as well as control tissue from healthy individuals (n = 15). <it>NDRG2 </it>levels were normalised to <it>β-actin</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p><it>NDRG2 </it>mRNA levels were lower in colorectal carcinomas compared to normal tissue from the control group (p < 0.001). When comparing adenomas/carcinomas with adjacent normal tissue from the same individual, <it>NDRG2 </it>expression levels were significantly reduced in both high-risk adenoma (p < 0.001) and in colorectal carcinoma (p < 0.001). There was a trend for <it>NDRG2 </it>levels to decrease with increasing Dukes' stage (p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results demonstrate that expression of <it>NDRG2 </it>is down-regulated at a late stage during colorectal carcinogensis. Future studies are needed to address whether <it>NDRG2 </it>down-regulation is a cause or consequence of the progression of colorectal adenomas to carcinoma.</p

A phase II study of capecitabine plus 3-weekly oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin every 3 weeks (XELOX regimen) has proven efficacy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. We investigated this combination in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric carcinoma. The study population comprised patients with histologically confirmed nonresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg m−2 over 2 h on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg m−2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks. Patients received a maximum of eight cycles. Twenty evaluable patients (17 men, 3 women) with a median age of 64 years (range 38–75) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI), 44–86%), with complete responses in two patients and partial responses in 11 patients. Median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.2–11.7 months); median overall survival was not reached during the study period. There was no grade 4 and little grade 3 toxicity. The most common haematological adverse event was anaemia (65% of patients) and the most common nonhaematological toxicities were vomiting (65%), neuropathy (60%), diarrhoea (30%), and hand–foot syndrome (20%). In conclusion, XELOX is apparently as effective as triplet combinations and is well tolerated as first-line therapy for advanced gastric carcinoma. We are starting a large multi-institutional phase II study of XELOX in this setting

Analysis and comparison of very large metagenomes with fast clustering and functional annotation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The remarkable advance of metagenomics presents significant new challenges in data analysis. Metagenomic datasets (metagenomes) are large collections of sequencing reads from anonymous species within particular environments. Computational analyses for very large metagenomes are extremely time-consuming, and there are often many novel sequences in these metagenomes that are not fully utilized. The number of available metagenomes is rapidly increasing, so fast and efficient metagenome comparison methods are in great demand.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The new metagenomic data analysis method Rapid Analysis of Multiple Metagenomes with a Clustering and Annotation Pipeline (<b>RAMMCAP</b>) was developed using an ultra-fast sequence clustering algorithm, fast protein family annotation tools, and a novel statistical metagenome comparison method that employs a unique graphic interface. RAMMCAP processes extremely large datasets with only moderate computational effort. It identifies raw read clusters and protein clusters that may include novel gene families, and compares metagenomes using clusters or functional annotations calculated by RAMMCAP. In this study, RAMMCAP was applied to the two largest available metagenomic collections, the "Global Ocean Sampling" and the "Metagenomic Profiling of Nine Biomes".</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>RAMMCAP is a very fast method that can cluster and annotate one million metagenomic reads in only hundreds of CPU hours. It is available from <url>http://tools.camera.calit2.net/camera/rammcap/</url>.</p

Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda®) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines

Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, was designed to generate 5-fluorouracil preferentially at the tumour site. This randomised, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Outpatients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer whose disease was unresponsive or resistant to anthracycline therapy were randomised to 3-week cycles of intermittent oral capecitabine (1255 mg m−2 twice daily, days 1–14, (22 patients)) or a reference arm of i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m−2, (20 patients)). Two additional patients were initially randomised to continuous capecitabine 666 mg m−2 twice daily, but this arm was closed following selection of the intermittent schedule for further development. Overall response rate was 36% (95% CI 17–59%) with capecitabine (including three complete responses) and 26% (95% CI 9–51%) with paclitaxel (no complete responses). Median time to disease progression was similar in the two treatment groups (3.0 months with capecitabine, 3.1 months with paclitaxel), as was overall survival (7.6 and 9.4 months, respectively). Paclitaxel was associated with more alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia and neutropenia, whereas typical capecitabine-related adverse events were diarrhoea, vomiting and hand–foot syndrome. Twenty-three per cent of capecitabine-treated patients and 16% of paclitaxel-treated patients achieved a ⩾10% improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status. Oral capecitabine is active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer and has a favourable safety profile. Furthermore, capecitabine provides a convenient, patient-orientated therapy