Endoscopic gastric volume reduction with a novel articulating plication device is safe and effective in the treatment of obesity (with video)

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic volume reduction of the stomach may provide a minimally invasive alternative for surgical procedures in the treatment of obesity. OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and preliminary effectiveness in the first human application of a novel endoscopic stapling technique. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, phase 1 study. SETTING: Two university hospitals in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 to 45 kg/m(2) or 30 to 39.9 kg/m(2) with obesity-related comorbidity. INTERVENTIONS: Gastric volume reduction with an endoscopic stapler. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measure was the prevalence of serious or mild adverse events. Reduction of excess body weight after 12 months was assessed as a secondary outcome measure for effectiveness of the procedure. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with a median BMI of 40.2 kg/m(2) (interquartile range [IQR] 37.6-42.8) underwent an endoscopic stapling procedure. Median procedure time was 123 minutes (IQR 95-129). No serious adverse events occurred. Adverse events were gastric pain (n = 7, range 1-3 days), sore throat (n = 4, 2-3 days), diarrhea (n = 4, 2-15 days), nausea (n = 3, 2-4 days), constipation (n = 4, 3-14 days), and vomiting (n = 3, 1-4 days). All adverse events were mild and resolved with conservative treatment within 15 days after surgery. The median percentage excess weight loss in the first year was 34.9% (IQR 17.8-46.6). LIMITATIONS: Limited number of patients. CONCLUSION: This first human application of this endoscopic stapler demonstrates that the procedure is technically feasible and safe. One hundred sixty plications were created in 17 patients without significant problems. Weight loss after 1 year is promising, but long-term follow-up and randomized, controlled studies should evaluate whether this procedure is an effective and durable minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for obesity. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01429194.)

Ursodeoxycholic acid counteracts celecoxib in reduction of duodenal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial

Background Due to prophylactic colectomy, mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has changed, with duodenal cancer currently being the main cause of death. Although celecoxib reduces duodenal polyp density in patients with FAP, its long-term use may increase the risk of cardiovascular events and alternatives need to be explored. Preclinical studies suggest that the combination of celecoxib with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a potentially effective strategy. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of celecoxib and UDCA co-treatment on duodenal adenomatosis in patients with FAP. Methods Patients with FAP received celecoxib (400 mg twice daily) and UDCA (1000-2000 mg daily, ~20-30 mg/kg/day, n=19) or celecoxib and placebo (n=18) orally for 6 months. Primary outcome was drug efficacy, assessed by comparing duodenal polyp density at pre- and post-intervention by blinded review of endoscopic recordings. As secondary outcomes, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and COX-2 levels in normal duodenal mucosa were assessed by immunohistochemistry or real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results In intention-to-treat analysis, deceased polyp density was observed after celecoxib/placebo treatment (p=0.029), whereas increased polyp density was observed after celecoxib/UDCA treatment (p=0.014). The difference in change in duodenal polyp density was statistically significant between the groups (p=0.011). No changes in secondary outcomes were observed. Thirty patients (81%) reported one or more adverse events, 16 patients (84%, Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE) grade 1–3) treated with celecoxib/UDCA and 14 patients (78%, CTCAE grade 1–2) treated with celecoxib/placebo. Nine patients (24%) discontinued intervention prematurely, 5 patients (26%) treated with celecoxib/UDCA and 4 patients (22%) treated with celecoxib/placebo. Conclusions Celecoxib reduces duodenal polyp density in patients with FAP, and unexpectedly, high dose UDCA co-treatment counteracts this effect. The benefit of long term use of celecoxib for duodenal cancer prevention needs to be weighed against the (risk of) adverse events

Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fecal Transplantation for Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND: & Aims: Several case series have reported the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed the efficacy and safety of FMT for patients with UC in a double-blind randomized trial. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderately active UC (n=50) were assigned to groups that underwent FMT with feces from healthy donors or were given autologous fecal microbiota (control); each was administered via naso-duodenal tube at the start of the study and 3 weeks later. The study was performed at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam from June 2011 through May 2014. The composite primary endpoint was clinical remission (simple clinical colitis activity index scores =2) combined with =1 point decrease in the Mayo endoscopic score at week 12. Secondary endpoints were safety and microbiota composition by phylogenetic microarray in fecal samples. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients completed the primary endpoint assessment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 7/23 patients who received fecal transplants from healthy donors (30.4%) and 5/25 controls (20.0%) achieved the primary endpoint (P=.51). In the per protocol analysis, 7/17 patients who received fecal transplants from healthy donors (41.2%) and 5/20 controls (25.0%) achieved the primary endpoint (P=.29). Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients (2 in the FMT group) but these were not considered to be related to the FMT. At 12 weeks the microbiota of responders in the FMT group was similar to that of their healthy donors; remission was associated with proportions of Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission between patients with UC who received fecal transplants from healthy donors and those who received their own fecal microbiota, which may be due to limited numbers. However, the microbiota of responders had distinct features from that of nonresponders, warranting further study. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT0165003

Effects of recovery modes after knee extensor muscles eccentric contractions

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the prevalence of small-bowel neoplasia in asymptomatic patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) by video capsule endoscopy (VCE). DESIGN: After obtaining informed consent, asymptomatic proven gene mutation carriers aged 35-70 years were included in this prospective multicentre study in the Netherlands. Patients with previous small-bowel surgery were excluded. After bowel preparation, VCE was performed. The videos were read by two independent investigators. If significant lesions were detected, an endoscopic procedure was subsequently performed to obtain histology and, if possible, remove the lesion. RESULTS: In total, 200 patients (mean age 50 years (range 35-69), M/F 88/112), with proven mutations were included. These concerned MLH1 (n=50), MSH2 (n=68), MSH6 (n=76), PMS2 (n=3) and Epcam (n=3) mutation carriers. In 95% of the procedures, caecal visualisation was achieved. Small-bowel neoplasia was detected in two patients: one adenocarcinoma (TisN0Mx) and one adenoma, both located in the duodenum. In another patient, a duodenal cancer (T2N0Mx) was diagnosed 7 months after a negative VCE. This was considered a lesion missed by VCE. All three neoplastic lesions were within reach of a conventional gastroduodenoscope. All patients with neoplasia were men, over 50 years of age and without a family history of small-bowel cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of small-bowel neoplasia in asymptomatic patients with LS was 1.5%. All neoplastic lesions were located in the duodenum and within reach of conventional gastroduodenoscopy. Although VCE has the potential to detect these neoplastic lesions, small-bowel neoplasia may be missed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00898768

Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fecal Transplantation for Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND: & Aims: Several case series have reported the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed the efficacy and safety of FMT for patients with UC in a double-blind randomized trial. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderately active UC (n=50) were assigned to groups that underwent FMT with feces from healthy donors or were given autologous fecal microbiota (control); each was administered via naso-duodenal tube at the start of the study and 3 weeks later. The study was performed at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam from June 2011 through May 2014. The composite primary endpoint was clinical remission (simple clinical colitis activity index scores =2) combined with =1 point decrease in the Mayo endoscopic score at week 12. Secondary endpoints were safety and microbiota composition by phylogenetic microarray in fecal samples. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients completed the primary endpoint assessment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 7/23 patients who received fecal transplants from healthy donors (30.4%) and 5/25 controls (20.0%) achieved the primary endpoint (P=.51). In the per protocol analysis, 7/17 patients who received fecal transplants from healthy donors (41.2%) and 5/20 controls (25.0%) achieved the primary endpoint (P=.29). Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients (2 in the FMT group) but these were not considered to be related to the FMT. At 12 weeks the microbiota of responders in the FMT group was similar to that of their healthy donors; remission was associated with proportions of Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission between patients with UC who received fecal transplants from healthy donors and those who received their own fecal microbiota, which may be due to limited numbers. However, the microbiota of responders had distinct features from that of nonresponders, warranting further study. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT0165003