32 research outputs found

    Epigrammi

    Get PDF
    Ġabra ta’ poeżiji u proża li tinkludi: Id-daqq tal-qanpiena ta’ għonq il-mogħża ħasbu l-vjatku ta’ Dun A. Tabone – Għaddejja l-purċissjoni ta’ Dun Frans Camilleri – Nazju jidħol baħri ta’ Alfie Guillaumier – Lil marti ta’ Pawlu Aquilina – In-nawfraġju ta’ Br. Henry – Orqod tfajjel, orqod ta’ Peter A. Caruana – Epigrammi ta’ E. Quattromani.peer-reviewe

    Nonlinear Dynamic Effects Induced by an Automotive Dual-Mass Flywheel

    No full text
    Internal combustion engines produce a fluctuating torque due to discrete combustion events, as well as inertial actions of the reciprocating masses. In standard operating conditions, the resulting torsional oscillations of the crankshaft are transferred to the gearbox, leading to a number of comfort problems. Dual mass flywheels (DMF) may be a solution to reduce torsional oscillations. They consist of a primary mass connected to the engine, a secondary mass connected to the transmission shaft and two or more sets of arc springs placed between the two rotary inertias. Friction between the primary mass and the arc springs ensure an additional source of damping when the arc springs are not loaded. This paper presents a discussion of the 3D nonlinear dynamic effects introduced in the driveline by an automotive DMF. A model for the DMF is developed and included into a multi-body model of the vehicle powertrain to assess the effect of its main parameters on the driveline behaviour (e.g. modes of vibration, radial forces). The DMF is modelled by primary and secondary masses and the arc springs between them. Centrifugal effects and redirection forces acting on the springs as well as nonlinear contact forces due to stoppers and flanges bounding spring motion are accounted for. Moreover, friction occurring in seals and friction resulting from the spring radial forces are included. Contact forces between primary and secondary masses of DMF with arc springs are modelled with a penalty approach and a contact detection algorithm. The developed 3D MB model has been compared with experimental data to assess its capability to reproduce DMF dynamics. A good correlation was found between numerical and experimental data during torsion tests at standstill and small displacement cycles at different angular speeds. Complex frictional phenomena like arc spring stiffening and hysteresis cycle shrinking with increasing angular speed are correctly captured, furthermore radial forces exchanged between DMF stages and transmission shafts can be evaluated thanks to a full 3D model

    Prehospital intravenous fentanyl to patients with hip fracture: an observational cohort study of risk factors for analgesic non-treatment

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Patients with proximal femoral neck fracture have a high short-term mortality, a high risk of postoperative complications, and impaired quality of life. One of the challenges related to the prehospital treatment of these patients is to administer systemic opioids fast and properly. Effective analgesic prehospital treatment ought be initiated rapidly in order to alleviate the stress that follows acute pain, to facilitate transportation, and to improve quality of care. The objectives of this study were to explore the prevalence of prehospital administration of intravenous fentanyl to patients with proximal femoral neck fracture in the ambulances and to assess risk factors for analgesic non-treatment.METHODS: This was a register-based observational cohort study of patients with proximal femoral neck fracture from the North Denmark Region transported by ambulance. The patients were identified via the Danish Interdisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry over a 3-year period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2014. This hospital registry contains data on several patient characteristics used for the risk factor analysis. Data on prehospital treatment (intravenous fentanyl) and patient monitoring were registered in an electronic prehospital patient record. A modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors was carried out with intravenous fentanyl as the primary binary outcome and the following explanatory variables: age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, housing, body mass index, type of fracture, fracture displacement, prior consultation with general practitioner, dispatch triage level, and time with ambulance personnel.RESULTS: In total, 2,140 patients with proximal femoral neck fracture were transported by ambulance, of which 584 (27.3%, 95% CI: 25.4-29.2) were treated with intravenous fentanyl. Risk factors for non-treatment were: older age, male sex (RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.91), institutional housing (RR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56-0.92), medial fracture (RR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60-0.92), short time with ambulance personnel, Charlson Comorbidity Index score &gt; 1, year of fracture (2011), low levels of urgency at dispatch, and if seen by general practitioners prior to transport.DISCUSSION: Education of ambulance personnel in assessing and treating patients with hip fracture seems to be required. Also, future studies should consider alternative or supportive pain treatment options with suitable analgesic effects and side effects.CONCLUSIONS: Few patients with proximal femoral neck fracture were treated with intravenous fentanyl, and several risk factors were associated with prehospital analgesic non-treatment. Future prospective studies should explore covariates of socioeconomic, cultural, and psychological origin to provide further insight into the multifactorial causes of non-treatment of acute pain.</p

    Preoperative Localization in Colonic Surgery (PLoCoS Study): a multicentric experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)

    No full text
    The aim of this prospective multicentric study was to compare the accurate colonic lesion localization ratio between CT and colonoscopy in comparison with surgery. All consecutive patients from 1st January to 31st December 2019 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of dysplastic adenoma or adenocarcinoma with planned elective, curative colonic resection who underwent both colonoscopy and CT scans were included. Each patient underwent conventional colonoscopy and CT to stage the tumour, and the localization results of each procedure were registered. CT and colonoscopic localization were compared with surgical localization, adopted as the reference. Our analysis included 745 patients from 23 centres. After comparing the accuracy of colonoscopy and CT (for visible lesions) in localizing colonic lesions, no significant differences were found between the two preoperative tools (510/661 vs 499/661 correctly localized lesions, p = 0.518). Furthermore, after analysing only the patients who underwent complete colonoscopy and had a visible lesion on CT, no significant difference was observed between conventional colonoscopy and CT (331/427 vs 340/427, p = 0.505). Considering the intraoperative localization results as a reference, a comparison between colonoscopy and CT showed that colonoscopy significantly failed to correctly locate the lesions localized in the descending colon (17/32 vs 26/32, p = 0.031). We did not identify an advantage in using CT to localize colonic tumours. In this setting, colonoscopy should be considered the reference to properly localize lesions; however, to better identify lesions in the descending colon, CT could be considered a valuable tool to improve the accuracy of lesion localization
    corecore