Implantation d'un laboratoire de biologie médicale au sein du French Medical Institute for Children de Kaboul (mise en place, aspects humanitaires et épidémiologiques)

LILLE2-BU Santé-Recherche (593502101) / SudocSudocFranceF

Clostridium difficile: New Insights into the Evolution of the Pathogenicity Locus

International audienceThe major virulence factors of Clostridium difficile are toxins A and B. These toxins are encoded by tcdA and tcdB genes, which form a pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) together with three additional genes that have been implicated in regulation (tcdR and tcdC) and secretion (tcdE). To date, the PaLoc has always been found in the same location and is replaced in non-toxigenic strains by a highly conserved 75/115 bp non-coding region. Here, we show new types of C. difficile pathogenicity loci through the genome analysis of three atypical clinical strains and describe for the first time a variant strain producing only toxin A (A + B −). Importantly, we found that the PaLoc integration sites of these three strains are located in the genome far from the usual single known PaLoc integration site. These findings allowed us to propose a new model of PaLoc evolution in which two " Mono-Toxin PaLoc " sites are merged to generate a single " Bi-Toxin PaLoc "

French national epidemiology of bacterial superinfections in ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients infected with COVID-19: the COVAP study

International audienceAbstract Background Description and comparison of bacterial characteristics of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) between critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19-positive, COVID + ; and non-COVID-19, COVID-. Methods Retrospective, observational, multicenter study that focused on French patients during the first wave of the pandemic (March–April 2020). Results 935 patients with identification of at least one bacteriologically proven VAP were included (including 802 COVID +). Among Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus accounted for more than two-thirds of the bacteria involved, followed by Streptococcaceae and enterococci without difference between clinical groups regarding antibiotic resistance. Among Gram-negative bacteria, Klebsiella spp. was the most frequently observed bacterial genus in both groups, with K. oxytoca overrepresented in the COVID- group (14.3% vs . 5.3%; p < 0.05). Cotrimoxazole-resistant bacteria were over-observed in the COVID + group (18.5% vs . 6.1%; p <0.05), and after stratification for K. pneumoniae (39.6% vs . 0%; p <0.05). In contrast, overrepresentation of aminoglycoside-resistant strains was observed in the COVID- group (20% vs . 13.9%; p < 0.01). Pseudomonas sp. was more frequently isolated from COVID + VAPs (23.9% vs . 16.7%; p <0.01) but in COVID- showed more carbapenem resistance (11.1% vs . 0.8%; p <0.05) and greater resistance to at least two aminoglycosides (11.8% vs . 1.4%; p < 0.05) and to quinolones (53.6% vs . 7.0%; p <0.05). These patients were more frequently infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria than COVID + (40.1% vs . 13.8%; p < 0.01). Conclusions The present study demonstrated that the bacterial epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of VAP in COVID + is different from that of COVID- patients. These features call for further study to tailor antibiotic therapies in VAP patients