Intracranial Cerebrospinal Fluid Volume as a Predictor of Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction

Background and Purpose— Predicting malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction can help to identify patients who may benefit from preventive decompressive surgery. We aimed to investigate the association between the ratio of intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume to intracranial volume (ICV) and malignant MCA infarction. Methods— Patients with an occlusion proximal to the M3 segment of the MCA were selected from the DUST (Dutch Acute Stroke Study). Admission imaging included noncontrast computed tomography (CT), CT perfusion, and CT angiography. Patient characteristics and CT findings were collected. The ratio of intracranial CSF volume to ICV (CSF/ICV) was quantified on admission thin-slice noncontrast CT. Malignant MCA infarction was defined as a midline shift of >5 mm on follow-up noncontrast CT, which was performed 3 days after the stroke or in case of clinical deterioration. To test the association between CSF/ICV and malignant MCA infarction, odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated for 3 multivariable models by using binary logistic regression. Model performances were compared by using the likelihood ratio test. Results— Of the 286 included patients, 35 (12%) developed malignant MCA infarction. CSF/ICV was independently associated with malignant MCA infarction in 3 multivariable models: (1) with age and admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1–11.1), (2) with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and poor collateral score (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% CI, 2.6–21.3), and (3) with terminal internal carotid artery or proximal M1 occlusion and poor collateral score (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% CI, 2.8–23.9). The performance of model 1 (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.795 versus 0.824; P=0.033), model 2 (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.813 versus 0.850; P<0.001), and model 3 (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.811 versus 0.856; P<0.001) improved significantly after adding CSF/ICV. Conclusions— The CSF/ICV ratio is associated with malignant MCA infarction and has added value to clinical and imaging prediction models in limited numbers of patients

Utility of Supplemental Training to Improve Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening: A Literature Review

PURPOSE: The authors evaluate whether supplemental training for radiologists improves their breast screening performance and how this is measured. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed on August 3, 2017. Articles were included if they described supplemental training for radiologists reading mammograms to improve their breast screening performance and at least one outcome measure was reported. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. RESULTS: Of 2,199 identified articles, 18 were included, of which 17 showed improvement on at least one of the outcome measures, for at least one training activity or subgroup. Two measurement approaches were found. For the first approach, measuring performance on test sets, sensitivity, and specificity were the most reported outcomes (8 of 11 studies). Recall rate is the most reported outcome (6 of 7 studies) for the second approach, which measures performance in actual screening practice. The studies were mainly of moderate quality (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument score 11.7 +/- 1.7), caused by small sample sizes and the lack of a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental training helps radiologists improve their screening performance, despite the mainly moderate quality of the studies. There is a need for better designed studies. Future studies should focus on performance in actual screening practice and should look for methods to isolate the training effect. If test sets are used, focus should be on knowledge about correlation between performance on test sets and actual screening practice

Performance characteristics of specimen radiography for margin assessment for ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Reducing positive margin rate (PMR) and reoperation rate in breast-conserving operations remains a challenge, mainly regarding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Intra-operative margin assessment tools have emerged to reduce PMR over the last decades, including specimen radiography (SR). No consensus has been reached on the reliability and efficacy of SR in DCIS. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic literature review to assess the performance characteristics of SR for margin assessment of breast lesions with pure DCIS and invasive cancers with DCIS components. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for diagnostic studies up to April 2017 concerning SR for intra-operative margin assessment of breast lesions with pure DCIS or with DCIS components. Studies reporting sensitivity and specificity calculated using final pathology report as reference test were included. Due to improved imaging technology, studies published more than 15 years ago were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 checklist. Due to clinical and methodological diversity, meta-analysis was considered not useful. RESULTS: Of 235 citations identified, 9 met predefined inclusion criteria and documented diagnostic efficacy data. Sensitivity ranged from 22 to 77% and specificity ranged from 51 to 100%. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value ranged from 53 to 100% and 32 to 95%, respectively. High or unclear risk of bias was found in reference standard in 5 of 9 studies. High concerns regarding applicability of index test were found in 6 of 9 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The present results do not support the routine use of intra-operative specimen radiography to reduce the rate of positive margins in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for pure DCIS or the DCIS component in invasive cancer. Future studies need to differentiate between initial and final specimen margin involvement. This could provide surgeons with a number needed to treat for a more applicable outcome

Utility of Supplemental Training to Improve Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening: A Literature Review

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: The authors evaluate whether supplemental training for radiologists improves their breast screening performance and how this is measured. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed on August 3, 2017. Articles were included if they described supplemental training for radiologists reading mammograms to improve their breast screening performance and at least one outcome measure was reported. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. RESULTS: Of 2,199 identified articles, 18 were included, of which 17 showed improvement on at least one of the outcome measures, for at least one training activity or subgroup. Two measurement approaches were found. For the first approach, measuring performance on test sets, sensitivity, and specificity were the most reported outcomes (8 of 11 studies). Recall rate is the most reported outcome (6 of 7 studies) for the second approach, which measures performance in actual screening practice. The studies were mainly of moderate quality (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument score 11.7 +/- 1.7), caused by small sample sizes and the lack of a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental training helps radiologists improve their screening performance, despite the mainly moderate quality of the studies. There is a need for better designed studies. Future studies should focus on performance in actual screening practice and should look for methods to isolate the training effect. If test sets are used, focus should be on knowledge about correlation between performance on test sets and actual screening practice

Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

The purpose of this study was to examine trends in incidence and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in southern Netherlands in the period 1984-2006 and assess the effect of mass screening. All patients with primary DCIS registered between 1984 and 2006 in the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry were included (n = 1,767). These data were linked to data from the population-based screening programme. The incidence of DCIS of the breast increased from 3/100,000 to almost 34/100,000 person-years in women aged 50-69 years in southern Netherlands since 1984. Mass screening was responsible for this increase. A stable 60% of DCIS was screen-detected. Over 11% of breast cancer patients have DCIS. In conclusion, the incidence of DCIS increased markedly in southern Netherlands with a clear effect of mammography screening since 1992

Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography

Purpose: To determine the frequency, pathology and causes of a delay in cancer diagnosis in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography. Methods: We included all 290,943 screening mammograms of women aged 50-75 years, who underwent biennial screening mammography between 1st January 1995 and 1st January 2006. During a follow-up period of at least 2 years, clinical data, breast imaging reports, biopsy results and breast surgery reports were collected of all 3513 women with a positive screening result. Tumour stages of breast cancers with a diagnostic delay (defined as breast cancer confirmation more than 3 months following a positive mammography screen) were compared with those of cancers diagnosed within 3 months following referral and with interval cancers. Results: A diagnostic delay occurred in 97 (6.5%) of 1503 screen-detected cancers. These 97 false-negative assessments comprised significantly more ductal cancers in situ (26.8%) than did cancers with an adequate assessment after recall (15.5%, p = 0.004) or interval cancers (3.7%, p < 0.001). Compared with interval cancers, cancers with a false-negative assessment had a more favourable tumour size (T1a-c, 87.3% versus T1a-c, 46.4%; p < 0.001) and showed significantly fewer cases with axillary lymph node metastases (22.5% versus 48.2%; p < 0.001). Between hospitals having performed the workup of at least 500 referred women each, the percentage of women with a false-negative assessment varied from 5.0% to 9.1% (p = 0.03). In these hospitals, improper classification of lesions at diagnostic mammography comprised 64.4% of false-negative assessments. Conclusion: We found that 6.5% of recalled women experienced a delay in breast cancer diagnosis, with significant performance variations between hospitals. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Drills for the pre-jump and free takeoff in the pole vault

BACKGROUND: CT angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion (CTP) are important diagnostic tools in acute ischemic stroke. We investigated the prognostic value of CTA and CTP for clinical outcome and determined whether they have additional prognostic value over patient characteristics and non-contrast CT (NCCT). METHODS: We included 1,374 patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke in the prospective multicenter Dutch acute stroke study. Sixty percent of the cohort was used for deriving the predictors and the remaining 40% for validating them. We calculated the predictive values of CTA and CTP predictors for poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6). Associations between CTA and CTP predictors and poor clinical outcome were assessed with odds ratios (OR). Multivariable logistic regression models were developed based on patient characteristics and NCCT predictors, and subsequently CTA and CTP predictors were added. The increase in area under the curve (AUC) value was determined to assess the additional prognostic value of CTA and CTP. Model validation was performed by assessing discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Poor outcome occurred in 501 patients (36.5%). Each of the evaluated CTA measures strongly predicted outcome in univariable analyses: the positive predictive value (PPV) was 59% for Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 70% carotid or vertebrobasilar stenosis/occlusion (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.2-4.6). The same applied to the CTP measures, as the PPVs were 65% for ASPECTS </=7 on cerebral blood volume maps (OR 5.1; 95% CI 3.7-7.2) and 53% for ASPECTS </=7 on mean transit time maps (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.9-5.3). The prognostic model based on patient characteristics and NCCT measures was highly predictive for poor clinical outcome (AUC 0.84; 95% CI 0.81-0.86). Adding CTA and CTP predictors to this model did not improve the predictive value (AUC 0.85; 95% CI 0.83-0.88). In the validation cohort, the AUC values were 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.82) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83), respectively. Calibration of the models was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke, admission CTA and CTP parameters are strong predictors of poor outcome and can be used to predict long-term clinical outcome. In multivariable prediction models, however, their additional prognostic value over patient characteristics and NCCT is limited in an unselected stroke population