30 research outputs found

    Midtrimester transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening for spontaneous preterm birth in diamniotic twin pregnancies according to chorionicity

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the mean transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) cervical length (CL) at midtrimester screening for spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic monochorionic diamniotic versus dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Study subjects were identified at the time of a routine second trimester fetal ultrasound exam at 18 0/7-23 6/7 weeks gestation. We excluded women that received progesterone, pessary, or cerclage. Distribution of CL was determined and normality was examined. Mean of TVU CL were compared between monochorionic diamniotic and dichorionic diamniotic pregnancies. The relationship of TVU CL with gestational age (GA) at delivery and incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) at different TVU CL cut offs were assessed. Incidence of short TVU CL, defined as TVU CL ≤30 mm, was also calculated in the two groups. RESULTS: 580 women with diamniotic twin pregnancies underwent TVU CL screening between 18 0/6 and 23 6/7 weeks. 175 (30.2%) were monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies, and 405 (69.8%) were dichorionic pregnancies. The demographic characteristics were similar on both groups. The mean GA at TVU CL was about 20 week in both groups. The mean TVU CL was significantly lower in the monochorionic diamniotic (32.8 ± 10.1) compared to the dichorionic (34.9 ± 8.6) group (MD -2.10 mm, 95% CI -3.91 to -0.29). TVU CL ≤30 mm was 16.6% (29/175) in the monochorionic group, and 11.9% (48/405) in the dichorionic group (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03-2.43). Twins with a monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy had a significantly higher incidence of SPTB (53.1% vs 44.9%; aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.22-1.79). For any given CL measured between 18 0-7 and 23 6/7 weeks, gestational age at delivery for monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies was about 2 weeks earlier compared to dichorionic pregnancies (MD -2.1 weeks; ANCOVA P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies had a higher rate of spontaneous preterm birth than dichorionic diamniotic pregnancies. The higher rate of spontaneous preterm delivery in monochorionic pregnancies is associated with lower midtrimester TVU CL when compared to dichorionic pregnancies

    Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies with short cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical pessary for preventing spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) in twin pregnancies with an asymptomatic transvaginal ultrasound cervical length (TVU CL) in the second trimester. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis including all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the use of cervical pessary (i.e. intervention group) with expectant management (i.e. control group). The primary outcome was incidence of SPTB <34 weeks. RESULTS: Three trials, including 481 twin pregnancies with short cervix, were analyzed. Two RCTs defined short cervix as TVU CL ≤25 mm and one as TVU CL ≤38 mm. Pessary was not associated with prevention of SPTB, and the mean gestational age at delivery and the mean latency were similar in the pessary group compared to the control group. Moreover, no benefits were noticed in neonatal outcomes.\ud CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Arabin pessary in twin pregnancies with short TVU CL at 16-24 weeks does not prevent SPTB or improve perinatal outcome

    Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors

    Get PDF
    Background: Learning to perform pelvic and breast examinations produces anxiety for many medical students. Clerkship directors have long sought strategies to help students become comfortable with the sensitive nature of these examinations. Incorporating standardized patients, simulation and gynecologic teaching associates (GTAs) are approaches gaining widespread use. However, there is a paucity of literature guiding optimal approach and timing. Our primary objective was to survey obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clerkship directors regarding timing and methods for teaching and assessment of pelvic and breast examination skills in United States medical school curricula, and to assess clerkship director satisfaction with current educational strategies at their institutions. Methods: Ob/Gyn clerkship directors from all 135 Liaison Committee on Medical Education accredited allopathic United States medical schools were invited to complete an anonymous 15-item web-based questionnaire. Results: The response rate was 70%. Pelvic and breast examinations are most commonly taught during the second and third years of medical school. Pelvic examinations are primarily taught during the Ob/Gyn and Family Medicine (FM) clerkships, while breast examinations are taught during the Ob/Gyn, Surgery and FM clerkships. GTAs teach pelvic and breast examinations at 72 and 65% of schools, respectively. Over 60% of schools use some type of simulation to teach examination skills. Direct observation by Ob/Gyn faculty is used to evaluate pelvic exam skills at 87% of schools and breast exam skills at 80% of schools. Only 40% of Ob/Gyn clerkship directors rated pelvic examination training as excellent, while 18% rated breast examination training as excellent. Conclusions: Pelvic and breast examinations are most commonly taught during the Ob/Gyn clerkship using GTAs, simulation trainers and clinical patients, and are assessed by direct faculty observation during the Ob/Gyn clerkship. While the majority of Ob/Gyn clerkship directors were not highly satisfied with either pelvic or breast examination training programs, they were less likely to describe their breast examination training programs as excellent as compared to pelvic examination training—overall suggesting an opportunity for improvement. The survey results will be useful in identifying future challenges in teaching such skills in a cost-effective manner. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

    Treatment for Mild Chronic Hypertension during Pregnancy.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The benefits and safety of the treatment of mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure, \u3c160/100 mm Hg) during pregnancy are uncertain. Data are needed on whether a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg reduces the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes without compromising fetal growth. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension and singleton fetuses at a gestational age of less than 23 weeks to receive antihypertensive medications recommended for use in pregnancy (active-treatment group) or to receive no such treatment unless severe hypertension (systolic pressure, ≥160 mm Hg; or diastolic pressure, ≥105 mm Hg) developed (control group). The primary outcome was a composite of preeclampsia with severe features, medically indicated preterm birth at less than 35 weeks\u27 gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The safety outcome was small-for-gestational-age birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Secondary outcomes included composites of serious neonatal or maternal complications, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. RESULTS: A total of 2408 women were enrolled in the trial. The incidence of a primary-outcome event was lower in the active-treatment group than in the control group (30.2% vs. 37.0%), for an adjusted risk ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.92; P CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women with mild chronic hypertension, a strategy of targeting a blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg was associated with better pregnancy outcomes than a strategy of reserving treatment only for severe hypertension, with no increase in the risk of small-for-gestational-age birth weight. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; CHAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02299414.)

    Application of Genomic Technology in Prenatal Diagnosis

    No full text
    corecore