Acromegalic Cardiomyopathy With Malignant Arrhythmogenic Pattern Successfully Treated With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Heart Transplantation

7noCardiovascular involvement is common in acromegaly and can lead to development of acromegalic cardiomyopathy, characterized by concentric biventricular hypertrophy with a progressive impairment of diastolic and systolic function. The onset of heart failure and arrhythmias are related to poor prognosis. We report on a case of a 48-year-old man with acromegalic cardiomyopathy caused by pituitary adenoma. Despite the successful trans-sphenoidal resection of the tumour, the patient was rehospitalized for ventricular arrhythmic storms that led to cardiogenic shock, which required mechanical hemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon pump, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and urgent heart transplantation.partially_openembargoed_20180221Doimo, Sara*; Miani, Daniela; Finato, Nicoletta; Driussi, Mauro; Sinagra, Gianfranco; Livi, Ugolino; Proclemer, AlessandroDoimo, Sara; Miani, Daniela; Finato, Nicoletta; Driussi, Mauro; Sinagra, Gianfranco; Livi, Ugolino; Proclemer, Alessandr

Heart transplantation in cardiac amyloidosis

It is known that the prognosis of patients affected by light-chain (AL) or transthyretin-related (TTR) amyloidosis is poor. TTR amyloidosis has usually shown a slower progression than AL amyloidosis, both hereditary TTR amyloidosis, where there is an inherited mutation in the DNA, and wild-type TTR amyloidosis, which usually affects the elderly. In this paper, the current literature about heart transplantation on cardiac amyloidosis patients is extensively reviewed. The two most frequent types of cardiac amyloidosis have been considered for heart transplantation: AL amyloidosis and wild-type TTR amyloidosis. According to this analysis, it is reasonable that heart transplantation may represent a valuable option in carefully selected patients. Moreover, it could improve prognosis, enabling autologous stem cell transplantation in the AL amyloidosis subgroup. In our humble opinion, it is mandatory to define a multidisciplinary approach to help select candidates to obtain the most effective results

Combined orthotopic heart transplantation followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in a patient with light chain amyloidosis and isolated cardiac involvement

n/

Pharmacoutilization and adherence to sacubitril/valsartan in real world: the REAL.IT study in HFrEF

Abstract Aims The current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines provide clear indications for the treatment of acute and chronic heart failure (HF). Nevertheless, there is a constant need for real‐world evidence regarding the effectiveness, adherence, and persistence of drug therapy. We investigated the use of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical practice in Italy. Methods and results An observational, retrospective, non‐interventional cohort study based on electronic medical records from nine specialized hospital HF centres in Italy was carried out on patients with prescription of sacubitril/valsartan. Overall, 948 patients had a prescription of sacubitril/valsartan, with 924 characterized over 6 months and followed up for 12 months. Pharmacoutilization data at 1 year of follow‐up were available for 225 patients {mean age 69.7 years [standard deviation (SD) = 10.8], 81.8% male}. Of those, 398 (45.2%) reached the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan of 97/103 mg in a mean time of 6.9 (SD = 6.2) weeks. Blood pressure and hypotension in 61 patients (65%) and worsening of chronic kidney disease in 10 patients (10.6%) were the main reasons for not reaching the target dose. Approximatively 50% of patients had a change in sacubitril/valsartan dose during follow‐up, and 158 (70.2%) were persistent with the treatment during the last 3 months of follow‐up. A sensitivity analysis (persistence during the last 4 months of follow‐up) showed persistence for 162 patients (72.0%). Adherence data, available for 387 patients, showed full adherence for 205 (53%). Discontinuation (102/717 patients, 14.2%) was mainly due to hypotension and occurred after a mean time of 34.3 (SD = 28.7) weeks. During follow‐up, out of 606 patients with available data, 434 patients (71.6%) had an HF add‐on drug or drugs concomitant with sacubitril/valsartan. HF‐related hospitalization during follow‐up was numerically higher in non‐persistent (16/67 patients, 23.9%) vs. patients persistent to sacubitril/valsartan (30/158, 19%) (P = 0.405). Conclusions Real‐world data on the use of sacubitril/valsartan in clinical practice in Italy show a rapid titration to the target dose, high therapeutic adherence enabling a good level of therapeutic management in line with ESC guidelines for patients with reduced ejection fraction

Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Real-World Experience from Italy (the REAL.IT Study)

Sacubitril/valsartan reduces heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality in PARADIGM-HF and has become a foundational treatment for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data of its routine real-world use are limited, and evidence from Italian settings is lacking. The REAL.IT study aimed to characterize the demographics, pharmacotherapy, clinical characteristics and outcomes of sacubitril/valsartan-treated Italian patients with HFrEF. Electronic medical records of patients initiating sacubitril/valsartan from October 2016 to June 2019 at nine specialized hospital outpatient HF centers across Italy were reviewed. Overall, 924 adults (mean age 64.5 years, 84.6% male) were included. At baseline, 38.7% had an ischemic HF etiology, 45.9% hypertension, 23.2% atrial fibrillation, 25.4% diabetes mellitus, 26.1% an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and 31.9% coronary artery bypass grafting. There were no clear patterns of patient selection over time. During follow-up, NYHA class improved in 37.5% of patients after a mean of 5.3 ± 3.8 months; 36.1% and 16.7% of patients were in NYHA class III during characterization and after one year of follow-up, respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved ≥5% in 56.3% of patients at one year; 39.7% had ≥30% reduction of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; 2.2% had hyperkalemia during characterization and 2.6% during follow-up; and 3.8% had hypotension during characterization and 12% during follow-up. A total of 50 (5.8%) of patients had device implantation (ICD/CRT) during follow-up. HF-related hospitalization was recorded in 19.6% of patients during follow-up; 3.8% of patients died, approximately 1.3% from cardiovascular causes. Our real-world data confirm the favorable effectiveness and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan observed in pivotal randomized controlled trials

Performance of risk stratification scores and role of comorbidities in older vs younger patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Background: Risk scores are important tools for the prognostic stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Their performance and the additional impact of comorbidities across age groups is unknown. Methods: Patients with PAH enrolled from 2001 to 2021 were divided in ≥65 years old vs <65 years old patients. Study outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality. French Pulmonary Hypertension Network (FPHN), FPHN noninvasive, Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL 2.0) risk scores were calculated and patients categorized at low, intermediate and high risk. Number of comorbidities was calculated. Results: Among 383 patients, 152 (40%) were ≥65 years old. They had more comorbidities (number of comorbidities 2, IQR 1-3, vs 1, IQR 0-2 in <65 years patients). Five-year survival was 63% in ≥65 vs 90% in <65 years. Risk scores correctly discriminated the different classes of risk in the overall cohort and in the older and younger groups. REVEAL 2.0 showed the best accuracy in the total cohort (C-index 0.74, standard error-SE- 0.03) and older (C-index 0.69, SE 0.03) patients, whereas COMPERA 2.0 performed better in younger patients (C-index 0.75, SE 0.08). Number of comorbidities was associated with higher 5-year mortality, and consistently increased the accuracy of risk scores, in younger but not in older patients. Conclusions: Risk scores have similar accuracy in the prognostic stratification of older vs younger PAH patients. REVEAL 2.0 had the best performance in older patients and COMPERA 2.0 had it in younger patients. Comorbidities increased the accuracy of risk scores only in younger patients