5 research outputs found

    Protein and lipid homeostasis altered in rat macrophages after exposure to metallic oxide nanoparticles

    Get PDF
    Metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs), such as ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and Fe2O3, are widely used in industry. However, little is known about the cellular pathways involved in their potential toxicity. Here, we particularly investigated the key molecular pathways that are switched on after exposure to sub-toxic doses of ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and Fe2O3 in the in vitro rat alveolar macrophages (NR8383). As in our model, the calculated IC50 were respectively 16, 68, and more than 200 Όg/mL for ZnO, ZnFe2O4, and Fe2O3; global gene and protein expression profiles were only analyzed after exposure to ZnO and ZnFe2O4 NPs. Using a rat genome microarray technology, we found that 985 and 1209 genes were significantly differentially expressed in NR8383 upon 4 h exposure to Œ IC50 of ZnO and ZnFe2O4 NPs, respectively. It is noteworthy that metallothioneins were overexpressed genes following exposure to both NPs. Moreover, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed that the top canonical pathway disturbed in NR8383 exposed to ZnO and ZnFe2O4 NPs was eIF2 signaling involved in protein homeostasis. Quantitative mass spectrometry approach performed from both NR8383 cell extracts and culture supernatant indicated that 348 and 795 proteins were differentially expressed upon 24 h exposure to Œ IC50 of ZnO and ZnFe2O4 NPs, respectively. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the top canonical pathways disturbed in NR8383 were involved in protein homeostasis and cholesterol biosynthesis for both exposure conditions. While VEGF signaling was specific to ZnO exposure, iron homeostasis signaling pathway was specific to ZnFe2O4 NPs. Overall, the study provides resource of transcriptional and proteomic markers of response to ZnO and ZnFe2O4 NP-induced toxicity through combined transcriptomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics approaches.European Commission Horizon 202

    Exposure and effect biomarkers identification after exposure of in vitro cell model to metallic nanoparticles

    No full text
    En consĂ©quence de l'extension de l’utilisation des nanoparticules dans diffĂ©rents secteurs industriels, le nombre de travailleurs potentiellement exposĂ©s ne cesse de croĂźtre, sans parfaitement connaĂźtre les propriĂ©tĂ©s toxicologiques de ces matĂ©riaux. Étant donnĂ© que les nanoparticules peuvent se trouver en suspension dans l’atmosphĂšre professionnelle, l'inhalation reprĂ©sente une voie d'exposition professionnelle majeure. De ce fait, l’évaluation des risques liĂ©s Ă  l’exposition aux nanomatĂ©riaux requiert d’entreprendre des Ă©tudes de toxicologie sur des modĂšles cellulaires des voies aĂ©riennes. Dans ce manuscrit, les rĂ©ponses cellulaires et molĂ©culaires des macrophages alvĂ©olaires de rat (NR8383) exposĂ©s Ă  des nanoparticules d’oxydes mĂ©talliques : ZnO, ZnFe2O4, NiZnFe2O4, Fe2O3, TiO2-NM105 et TiO2-NRCWE001, ont Ă©tĂ© Ă©tudiĂ©es, en combinant des analyses toxicologiques classiques (caractĂ©risation des nanoparticules par microscopie Ă©lectronique Ă  transmission et par diffusion dynamique de la lumiĂšre, Ă©valuation de la cytotoxicitĂ© par tests WST-1 et libĂ©ration de LDH); et de criblage molĂ©culaire Ă  haut dĂ©bit (analyses de transcriptomique et de protĂ©omique). Des cellules NR8383 ont Ă©tĂ© exposĂ©es aux nanoparticules ZnO, ZnFe2O4, NiZnFe2O4, Fe2O3, TiO2-NM105 et TiO2-NRCWE001 pendant 24 h ce qui a permis de dĂ©terminer une dose sub-toxique pour chaque nanoparticule Ă  laquelle les macrophages ont Ă©tĂ© exposĂ©s pour l’analyse molĂ©culaire. Quatre heures suite Ă  l’exposition des cellules aux nanoparticules, de nombreux gĂšnes et protĂ©ines Ă©taient diffĂ©rentiellement exprimĂ©s. Le stress oxydant Ă©tait la rĂ©ponse biologique adverse suite Ă  l’exposition des cellules aux nanoparticules composĂ©es de zinc. En revanche, l’inflammation Ă©tait la principale voie activĂ©e dans les cellules exposĂ©es Ă  la forme anatase et rutile des nanoparticules de TiO2. En conclusion, cette Ă©tude expose les « empreintes biologiques » des deux groupes de nanoparticules d’intĂ©rĂȘt. Enfin, notre Ă©tude combinĂ©e Ă  des travaux antĂ©rieurs de la littĂ©rature pourraient aussi ĂȘtre profitables pour valider les biomarqueurs d’exposition et d’effets aux nanomatĂ©riaux suggĂ©rĂ©s afin de prĂ©dire les effets biologiques adverses.As a consequence of the extension of the use of nanoparticles in different industrial sectors, the number of potentially exposed workers continues to grow, without fully knowing the toxicological properties of these materials. Since nanoparticles can be aerosolized in the occupational atmosphere, inhalation is the major occupational exposure route. For this reason, risk assessment of exposure to nanomaterials requires toxicology studies to be conducted on cellular models of the airways. In this manuscript, the cellular and molecular responses of rat alveolar macrophages (NR8383) exposed to metallic oxide nanoparticles: ZnO, ZnFe2O4, NiZnFe2O4, Fe2O3, TiO2-NM105 and TiO2-NRCWE001, were studied, combining conventional toxicological analyzes (characterization of nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering, evaluation of cytotoxicity by WST-1 assays and LDH release); and high throughput molecular screening (transcriptomic and proteomic analyzes). NR8383 cells were exposed to the ZnO, ZnFe2O4, NiZnFe2O4, Fe2O3, TiO2-NM105 and TiO2-NRCWE001 nanoparticles for 24 h which allowed for the determination of a sub-toxic dose for each nanoparticle to which the macrophages were exposed for molecular analysis. Four hours after exposure NR8383 to nanoparticles, many genes and proteins were differentially expressed. Oxidative stress was the adverse biological response following exposure of cells to nanoparticles composed of zinc. In contrast, inflammation was the main activated pathway in cells exposed to the anatase and rutile form of TiO2 nanoparticles. In conclusion, this study exposes the "biological fingerprints" of the two groups of nanoparticles of interest. Finally, our study, combined with previous literature studies, could also be beneficial in validating biomarkers of exposure and effects of nanomaterials suggested in order to predict adverse biological effects

    Cytotoxicity and global transcriptional responses induced by zinc oxide nanoparticles NM 110 in PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells

    No full text
    International audienceDespite a wide production and use of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONP), their toxicological study is only of limited number and their impact at a molecular level is seldom addressed. Thus, we have used, as a model, zinc oxide nanoparticle NM110 (ZnO110NP) exposure to PMA-differentiated THP-1 macrophages. The cell viability was studied at the cellular level using WST-1, LDH and Alamar BlueÂź assays, as well as at the molecular level by transcriptomic analysis. Exposure of cells to ZnO110NP for 24 h decreased their viability in a dose-dependent manner with mean inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 8.1 ”g/mL. Transcriptomic study of cells exposed to two concentrations of ZnO110NP: IC50 and a quarter of it (IC50/4) for 4 h showed that the expressions of genes involved in metal metabolism are perturbed. In addition, expression of genes acting in transcription regulation and DNA binding, as well as clusters of genes related to protein synthesis and structure were altered. It has to be noted that the expressions of metallothioneins genes (MT1, MT2) and genes of heat-shock proteins genes (HSP) were strongly upregulated for both conditions. These genes might be used as an early marker of exposition to ZnONP. On the contrary, at IC50 exposure, modifications of gene expression involved in inflammation, apoptosis and mitochondrial suffering were noted indicating a less specific cellular response. Overall, this study brings a resource of transcriptional data for ZnONP toxicity for further mechanistic studies

    CdTe<sub>0.5</sub>S<sub>0.5</sub>/ZnS Quantum Dots Embedded in a Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for the Selective Optosensing of Dopamine

    No full text
    This work describes the preparation of molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-modified core/shell CdTe0.5S0.5/ZnS quantum dots (QDs). The QDs@MIP particles were used for the selective and sensitive detection of dopamine (DA). Acrylamide, which is able to form hydrogen bonds with DA, and ethylene glycol dimethylacrylate (EGDMA) as cross-linker were used for the preparation of the MIP. Highly cross-linked polymer particles with sizes up to 1 &#181;m containing the dots were obtained after the polymerization. After the removal of the DA template, MIP-modified QDs (QDs@MIP) exhibit a high photoluminescence (PL) with an intensity similar to that of QDs embedded in the nonimprinted polymer (NIP). A linear PL decrease was observed upon addition of DA to QDs@MIP and the PL response was in the linear ranges from 2.63 &#181;M to 26.30 &#181;M with a limit of detection of 6.6 nM. The PL intensity of QDs@MIP was quenched selectively by DA. The QDs@MIP particles developed in this work are easily prepared and of low cost and are therefore of high interest for the sensitive and selective detection of DA in biological samples

    Toxicity of TiO2 Nanoparticles: Validation of Alternative Models

    No full text
    There are many studies concerning titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NP) toxicity. Nevertheless, there are few publications comparing in vitro and in vivo exposure, and even less comparing air&ndash;liquid interface exposure (ALI) with other in vitro and in vivo exposures. The identification and validation of common markers under different exposure conditions are relevant for the development of smart and quick nanotoxicity tests. In this work, cell viability was assessed in vitro by WST-1 and LDH assays after the exposure of NR8383 cells to TiO2 NP sample. To evaluate in vitro gene expression profile, NR8383 cells were exposed to TiO2 NP during 4 h at 3 cm2 of TiO2 NP/cm2 of cells or 19 &mu;g/mL, in two settings&mdash;submerged cultures and ALI. For the in vivo study, Fischer 344 rats were exposed by inhalation to a nanostructured aerosol at a concentration of 10 mg/m3, 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. This was followed immediately by gene expression analysis. The results showed a low cytotoxic potential of TiO2 NP on NR8383 cells. Despite the absence of toxicity at the doses studied, the different exposures to TiO2 NP induce 18 common differentially expressed genes (DEG) which are involved in mitosis regulation, cell proliferation and apoptosis and inflammation transport of membrane proteins. Among these genes, we noticed the upregulation of Ccl4, Osm, Ccl7 and Bcl3 genes which could be suggested as early response biomarkers after exposure to TiO2 NP. On the other hand, the comparison of the three models helped us to validate the alternative ones, namely submerged and ALI approaches
    corecore