Effect on platelet reactivity from a prasugrel loading dose after a clopidogrel loading dose compared with a prasugrel loading dose alone: Transferring From Clopidogrel Loading Dose to Prasugrel Loading Dose in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients (TRIPLET): a randomized controlled trial

Background: Adding a prasugrel loading dose (LD) to a clopidogrel LD could be desirable because clopidogrel may fail to provide adequate levels of platelet inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results The pharmacodynamic response of prasugrel 60 mg LD alone was compared with prasugrel 60 mg or 30 mg added 24 hours to clopidogrel 600 mg in Transferring from Clopidogrel Loading Dose to Prasugrel Loading Dose in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients studya multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 3-arm, parallel, active-comparator controlled study. Two hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to 3 LD strategies: placebo plus prasugrel 60 mg, clopidogrel 600 mg plus prasugrel 60 mg, or clopidogrel 600 mg plus prasugrel 30 mg. Platelet function was assessed using VerifyNow P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) immediately before prasugrel LD, and 2, 6, 24, and 72 hours after prasugrel LD in 149 patients with evaluable platelet function studies. At 6 hours after the prasugrel 60 mg LD, the least squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference between placebo/prasugrel 60 mg and clopidogrel 600 mg/prasugrel 60 mg (primary outcome) was 22.2 (-11.0 to 55.5; P=0.19; least squares mean PRU 57.9 versus 35.6, respectively). For clopidogrel 600 mg/prasugrel 30 mg (least squares mean PRU, 53.9), the difference was 3.9 (-28.2 to 36.1; P=0.81) versus placebo/prasugrel 60 mg. No significant differences in PRU were observed at any time point across the 3 groups. There were few bleeding events observed regardless of treatment. Conclusions Platelet reactivity with prasugrel 60 mg LD added to clopidogrel 600 mg LD was not significantly different compared with prasugrel 60 mg LD alone in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01115738

The prevalence of endothelial dysfunction in patients with and without coronary artery disease

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is frequently present in patients presenting with acute or stable coronary artery disease (CAD), but it is also found in patients presenting with chest pain without angiographic coronary lesions

Stable angina and acute coronary syndromes are associated with nitric oxide resistance in platelets

Copyright © 2001 American College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.OBJECTIVES The study examined possible clinical determinants of platelet resistance to nitric oxide (NO) donors in patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS), relative to nonischemic patients and normal subjects. BACKGROUND We have shown previously that platelets from patients with SAP are resistant to the antiaggregating effects of nitroglycerin (NTG) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP). METHODS Extent of adenosine diphosphate (1 μmol/liter)-induced platelet aggregation (impedance aggregometry in whole blood) and inhibition of aggregation by NTG (100 μmol/liter) and SNP (10 μmol/liter) were compared in normal subjects (n = 43), nonischemic patients (those with chest pain but no fixed coronary disease, (n = 35) and patients with SAP (n = 82) or ACS (n = 153). Association of NO resistance with coronary risk factors, coronary artery disease (CAD), intensity of angina and current medication was examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS In patients with SAP and ACS as distinct from nonischemic patients and normal subjects, platelet aggregability was increased (both p < 0.01), and inhibition of aggregation by NTG and SNP was decreased (both p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that NO resistance occurred significantly more frequently with ACS than with SAP (odds ratio [OR] 2.3:1), and was less common among patients treated with perhexiline (OR 0.3:1) or statins (OR 0.45:1). Therapy with other antianginal drugs, extent of CAD, intensity of angina and coronary risk factors were not associated with variability in platelet responsiveness to NO donor. CONCLUSIONS Patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease, especially ACS, exhibit increased platelet aggregability and decreased platelet responsiveness to the antiaggregatory effects of NO donors. The extent of NO resistance in platelets is not correlated with coronary risk factors. Pharmacotherapy with perhexiline and/or statins may improve platelet responsiveness to NO.Yuliy Y. Chirkov, Andrew S. Holmes, Scott R. Willoughby, Simon Stewart, Ronald D. Wuttke, Peter R. Sage and John D. Horowit