Dissecting the TOR-S6K signal transduction pathway in maize seedlings: relevance on cell growth regulation

Insulin and 'insulin-like' growth factors (IGFs) are known to regulate cell growth in eukaryotes by stimulating a signal transduction pathway that exerts translational control. Intermediate kinases of this pathway, target of rapamycin (TOR) and ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K), have been reported in Arabidospsis thaliana and Zea mays. However, upstream signal inducers and downstream targets of the pathway are not well known in plants. The objective of this work is to inquire whether plant growth is regulated by a signal transduction pathway similar to the insulin/IGF-stimulated pathway in other metazoans. Insulin as well as Zea mays insulin-related peptide (ZmIGF), which is a maize, 20-kDa peptide fraction recognized by insulin antibody, were used as effectors to stimulate maize axes growth from germinating seeds. ZmIGF expression was identified in axes from germinating maize seeds and immunolocalized in the meristems of these tissues. Significant enhancement of specific de novo protein synthesis of the translational apparatus components was found in the stimulated axes. Reverse-transcription-polymerasechain reaction analysis of total and polysomal RNA pools in ZmIGF- or insulin-stimulated axes confirmed these data by revealing specific mRNA recruitment into polysomes. In addition, the same stimuli induced activation of S6 ribosomal protein kinase (ZmS6K) in germinating maize axes. All the above effects were inhibited by rapamycin, indicating that they depend on TOR activity. We conclude that a TOR-S6K signal transduction pathway is functional in maize germination, as that found for non-photosynthetic eukaryotes. The evolutionary implications of these findings are discussed

Distinct recruitment of human eIF4E isoforms to processing bodies and stress granules

Background: Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) plays a pivotal role in the control of cap-dependent translation initiation, modulates the fate of specific mRNAs, occurs in processing bodies (PBs) and is required for formation of stress granules (SGs). In this study, we focused on the subcellular localization of a representative compendium of eIF4E protein isoforms, particularly on the less studied members of the human eIF4E protein family, eIF4E2 and eIF4E3. Results: We showed that unlike eIF4E1, its less studied isoform eIF4E3_A, encoded by human chromosome 3, localized to stress granules but not PBs upon both heat shock and arsenite stress. Furthermore, we found that eIF4E3_A interacts with human translation initiation factors eIF4G1, eIF4G3 and PABP1 in vivo and sediments into the same fractions as canonical eIF4E1 during polysome analysis in sucrose gradients. Contrary to this finding, the truncated human eIF4E3 isoform, eIF4E3_B, showed no localization to SGs and no binding to eIF4G. We also highlighted that eIF4E2 may exhibit distinct functions under different stresses as it readily localizes to P-bodies during arsenite and heat stresses, whereas it is redirected to stress granules only upon heat shock. We extended our study to a number of protein variants, arising from alternative mRNA splicing, of each of the three eIF4E isoforms. Our results surprisingly uncovered differences in the ability of eIF4E1_1 and eIF4E1_3 to form stress granules in response to cellular stresses. Conclusion: Our comparison of all three human eIF4E isoforms and their protein variants enriches the intriguing spectrum of roles attributed to the eukaryotic initiation translation factors of the 4E family, which exhibit a distinctive localization within different RNA granules under different stresses. The localization of eIF4E3_A to stress granules, but not to processing bodies, along with its binding to eIF4G and PABP1 suggests a role of human eIF4E3_A in translation initiation rather than its involvement in a translational repression and mRNA decay and turnover. The localization of eIF4E2 to stress granules under heat shock but not arsenite stress indicates its distinct function in cellular response to these stresses and points to the variable protein content of SGs as a consequence of different stress insults