Procedures for behavioral experiments in head-fixed mice.

The mouse is an increasingly prominent model for the analysis of mammalian neuronal circuits. Neural circuits ultimately have to be probed during behaviors that engage the circuits. Linking circuit dynamics to behavior requires precise control of sensory stimuli and measurement of body movements. Head-fixation has been used for behavioral research, particularly in non-human primates, to facilitate precise stimulus control, behavioral monitoring and neural recording. However, choice-based, perceptual decision tasks by head-fixed mice have only recently been introduced. Training mice relies on motivating mice using water restriction. Here we describe procedures for head-fixation, water restriction and behavioral training for head-fixed mice, with a focus on active, whisker-based tactile behaviors. In these experiments mice had restricted access to water (typically 1 ml/day). After ten days of water restriction, body weight stabilized at approximately 80% of initial weight. At that point mice were trained to discriminate sensory stimuli using operant conditioning. Head-fixed mice reported stimuli by licking in go/no-go tasks and also using a forced choice paradigm using a dual lickport. In some cases mice learned to discriminate sensory stimuli in a few trials within the first behavioral session. Delay epochs lasting a second or more were used to separate sensation (e.g. tactile exploration) and action (i.e. licking). Mice performed a variety of perceptual decision tasks with high performance for hundreds of trials per behavioral session. Up to four months of continuous water restriction showed no adverse health effects. Behavioral performance correlated with the degree of water restriction, supporting the importance of controlling access to water. These behavioral paradigms can be combined with cellular resolution imaging, random access photostimulation, and whole cell recordings

Humoral and cellular immune response in patients with hematological disorders after two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine: A single‐center prospective observational study (NCT05074706)

Abstract Hematological patients at higher risk of severe COVID‐19 were excluded from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccine trials. In this single‐center observational prospective study (NCT05074706), we evaluate immune response in the hematological patients followed at the Hematological Division of San Gerardo Hospital, Monza (Italy) deemed to be severely immunosuppressed after vaccination with two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulin G titers above the cutoff value of 33.8 BAU/ml were detected in 303 (80.2%) out of the 378 patients enrolled. Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders had a significant lower probability of immunization (43.2% vs. 88.4%, p < 0.001). Patients treated with anti‐CD20 showed a significantly lower probability of immunization compared to all other treatments (21.4%, p < 0.0001). Among 69 patients who failed seroconversion, 15 patients (22.7%) showed a positive T‐cell response. Patients previously treated with anti‐CD20 were 2.4 times more likely to test positive for T‐cell responses (p = 0.014). Within a follow‐up of 9 months from the second COVID‐19 vaccination, symptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 infections were reported by 20 patients (5.3%) and four of them required hospitalization. Successful serological or T‐cell‐mediated immunization conferred protection from symptomatic COVID‐19. Patients treated with anti‐CD20 who were not seroconverted after vaccination might still be protected from COVID‐19 due to the T‐cell immune response

Apparatus for head-fixation.

<p>A. Left, two types of titanium head plates. Right, stainless steel head bar holder and clamp (only one of two sides is shown). The head plate is inserted into notches in the holder and fastened with the clamp (right, top) and a thumbscrew (not shown). The simple head bar (left, top) is used when access to large parts of the brain is necessary. The larger head plate (left, middle) provides better stability. The simple head bar was cemented to the skull of the mouse (left, bottom). The head of the mouse (top view) was pointing downward. The skull was outfitted with a clear skull cap <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone.0088678-Guo1" target="_blank">[7]</a>. The head bar was aligned at the lambda sutures. The red dot indicates the location of bregma. B. Plexiglass body tube used for head-fixed mice. Mice rest their front paws on the front ledge. The bottom of the tube is coated with aluminum foil to produce electrical contact for electric lickports. The aluminum foil is connected to the red banana socket which will be connected to electric lickports for detecting licking events. C. Example caddy used in training apparatus, assembled from standard optomechanical components (Thorlabs). The head bar holder is mounted towards the left. D. A head-fixed mouse in the caddy.</p

Supplementing water rewards with sucrose increases the number of trials performed by mice.

<p>A. Example experiment, with water (black circles) and sucrose (red circles) rewards provided on alternating sessions. B. The number of trials is 23% larger with sucrose (p<0.001 in two mice; n.s. in the third). C. The number of rewards per session is larger (p<0.001 in two mice; n.s. in the third). D. The discriminability index is unchanged.</p

Normalized weight of 5 female mice after the initial water restriction (left) and after one day of free access to water (dotted line, day 0).

<p>Normalized weight of 5 female mice after the initial water restriction (left) and after one day of free access to water (dotted line, day 0).</p

A lick/no-lick object location discrimination task for head-fixed mice [23].

<p>A. Block-diagram of the possible events in a single trial. B. Schematic representation of event timing during a single lick trial. C. Schematic representation of the behavioral contingency. Mice had to lick for a water reward when the pole was in a posterior position and hold their tongue when the pole was in an anterior position. In some experiments, the contingency of the pole positions was reversed. D. Behavioral data from one session. The abscissa shows the time from trial start. Lick and no-lick trials are randomly interleaved. The pink ticks indicate licks. The red ticks indicate the first licks after the grace period. The blue bars correspond to the open times of the reward water valve. The horizontal green and red bars indicate whether each trial is correct or incorrect, respectively. The dark gray shading indicates that the pole is fully descended and in reach of the whiskers.</p

Mice with one or more indicators of stress or pain are placed on detailed health assessment.

<p>Activity levels, grooming, and indicators of eating and drinking are scored daily in a health assessment sheet. The total aggregate health score determines if mice are supplied with additional water (see flowchart in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone-0088678-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>).</p

Mouse weight and health during water restriction.

<p>All mice were trained in a lick/no-lick object location discrimination task using a single whisker (same mice as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone-0088678-g002" target="_blank">Figures 2</a> & <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone-0088678-g003" target="_blank">3</a> of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone.0088678-OConnor2" target="_blank">[18]</a>). Rewards consisted of approximately 8 µl of water per trial. A. Experimental time-course for one example mouse, from the beginning of water restriction to the end of electrophysiological recordings. An 85 day old mouse (25.4 g) was put on water restriction for eight days, followed by training (starting on day 9) and recording (starting on day 28). B. Body weight as a function of time. Same mouse as in A. The dashed line indicates 30% weight loss. C. Water consumed per day. After start of training mice mostly received their water during the training session. A larger number of correct trials will lead to more consumed water. Same mouse as in A. D. Health score as a function of time. A health score larger than 3 (dashed line) triggers more detailed evaluation and possibly water supplements. Same mouse as in A. E. Experimental time-course for a group of 5 mice. Same format as A. F. Average body weight of 5 mice (black line) and 2 mice with free access to water (grey line). Shading indicates standard deviation. Experimental time-course for all mice was similar, but not identical to A. G. Average water consumed. H. Average health score.</p

Performance of the lick-left/lick-right object location discrimination task with a delay epoch (data from Figure S1 [7]).

<p>A. Schematic of time-course of experiments. B. Learning curves showing the performance. Thin lines correspond to individual mice. Thick lines, average. Colors correspond to whisker trimming. Vertical dashed line indicates when the delay epoch was introduced. The four mice were from the same litter (2 males and 2 females). Same as Figure S1B in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone.0088678-Guo1" target="_blank">[7]</a>. C. Learning curves showing the discriminability index, d'. D. Bias: performance of lick-right trials minus performance of lick-left trials. Same as Figure S1C <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone.0088678-Guo1" target="_blank">[7]</a>. E. The fraction of trials with licking responses during the sample or delay epoch. Same as Figure S1D <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088678#pone.0088678-Guo1" target="_blank">[7]</a>. F. Water consumed. G. Trials per session. H. Health score. A health score larger than 3 (dashed line) triggers more detailed evaluation and possibly water supplements. I. Health score for four mice that were under water restriction for four months. A health score larger than 3 (dashed line) triggers more detailed evaluation and possibly water supplements.</p