11 research outputs found

    NO signaling and S-nitrosylation regulate PTEN inhibition in neurodegeneration

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The phosphatase PTEN governs the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway which is arguably the most important pro-survival pathway in neurons. Recently, PTEN has also been implicated in multiple important CNS functions such as neuronal differentiation, plasticity, injury and drug addiction. It has been reported that loss of PTEN protein, accompanied by Akt activation, occurs under excitotoxic conditions (stroke) as well as in Alzheimer's (AD) brains. However the molecular signals and mechanism underlying PTEN loss are unknown.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this study, we investigated redox regulation of PTEN, namely S-nitrosylation, a covalent modification of cysteine residues by nitric oxide (NO), and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>-mediated oxidation. We found that S-nitrosylation of PTEN was markedly elevated in brains in the early stages of AD (MCI). Surprisingly, there was no increase in the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>-mediated oxidation of PTEN, a modification common in cancer cell types, in the MCI/AD brains as compared to normal aged control. Using several cultured neuronal models, we further demonstrate that S-nitrosylation, in conjunction with NO-mediated enhanced ubiquitination, regulates both the lipid phosphatase activity and protein stability of PTEN. S-nitrosylation and oxidation occur on overlapping and distinct Cys residues of PTEN. The NO signal induces PTEN protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) through NEDD4-1-mediated ubiquitination.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study demonstrates for the first time that NO-mediated redox regulation is the mechanism of PTEN protein degradation, which is distinguished from the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>-mediated PTEN oxidation, known to only inactivate the enzyme. This novel regulatory mechanism likely accounts for the PTEN loss observed in neurodegeneration such as in AD, in which NO plays a critical pathophysiological role.</p

    High-throughput screening reveals alsterpaullone, 2-cyanoethyl as a potent p27Kip1 transcriptional inhibitor.

    No full text
    p27Kip1 is a cell cycle inhibitor that prevents cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)/cyclin complexes from phosphorylating their targets. p27Kip1 is a known tumor suppressor, as the germline loss of p27Kip1 results in sporadic pituitary formation in aged rodents, and its presence in human cancers is indicative of a poor prognosis. In addition to its role in cancer, loss of p27Kip1 results in regenerative phenotypes in some tissues and maintenance of stem cell pluripotency, suggesting that p27Kip1 inhibitors could be beneficial for tissue regeneration. Because p27Kip1 is an intrinsically disordered protein, identifying direct inhibitors of the p27Kip1 protein is difficult. Therefore, we pursued a high-throughput screening strategy to identify novel p27Kip1 transcriptional inhibitors. We utilized a luciferase reporter plasmid driven by the p27Kip1 promoter to transiently transfect HeLa cells and used cyclohexamide as a positive control for non-specific inhibition. We screened a "bioactive" library consisting of 8,904 (4,359 unique) compounds, of which 830 are Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved. From this screen, we successfully identified 111 primary hits with inhibitory effect against the promoter of p27Kip1. These hits were further refined using a battery of secondary screens. Here we report four novel p27Kip1 transcriptional inhibitors, and further demonstrate that our most potent hit compound (IC50ā€Š=ā€Š200 nM) Alsterpaullone 2-cyanoethyl, inhibits p27Kip1 transcription by preventing FoxO3a from binding to the p27Kip1 promoter. This screen represents one of the first attempts to identify inhibitors of p27Kip1 and may prove useful for future tissue regeneration studies

    Secondary screening of primary hits reveals four true <i>p27<sup>Kip1</sup></i> inhibitors.

    No full text
    <p>A. Workflow of the secondary screening procedures. B. Remaining hits after each step of the secondary screen. Cā€“F. Dose-dependent luciferase inhibition (black) and alamar blue inhibition (blue) of each compound (nā€Š=ā€Š3, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0091173#pone-0091173-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> lists the calculated IC<sub>50</sub>ā€™s). Curves were fitted by a sigmoidal dose-response curve. Gā€“J. Luciferase levels (normalized to DMSO) over 3 doses of each compound showing no effect on SV-40 driven luciferase (nā€Š=ā€Š3). Green line represents no change from vehicle DMSO to A2CE. Kā€“N. Dose-dependent decrease in endogenous p27<sup>Kip1</sup> mRNA of each compound normalized to that in DMSO control (RT-qPCR) in HeLa cells (nā€Š=ā€Š3). Mean Ā± S.E.M., * p<0.05 (One way ANOVA, followed by bonferroni for means comparison).</p

    Alsterpaullone, 2-Cyanoethyl inhibits <i>p27<sup>Kip1</sup></i> transcription from diverse cellular origins, and reduces p27<sup>Kip1</sup> protein levels.

    No full text
    <p>A. Immunoblot of p27<sup>Kip1</sup> and Ī²-actin with indicated concentration of A2CE in HeLa cells. B. Relative intensity of p27<sup>Kip1</sup> normalized to Ī²-actin by densitometry (nā€Š=ā€Š3) with indicated concentrations of A2CE. C. Fold changes of endogenous p27<sup>Kip1</sup> mRNA (normalized to 18s) in HEK cells treated with indicated concentrations of A2CE normalized to DMSO (nā€Š=ā€Š3). D. Alamar blue cell viability assay in HEK cells treated with indicated concentrations of A2CE. E. Fold changes of endogenous p27<sup>Kip1</sup> mRNA (normalized to 18s) in 3T3 cells treated with indicated concentrations of A2CE normalized to DMSO (nā€Š=ā€Š3). F. Alamar blue cell viability assay in 3T3 cells treated with indicated concentrations of A2CE G. Fold changes of endogenous p27<sup>Kip1</sup> mRNA (normalized to 18s) in cochlear explants treated with indicated concentrations of A2CE normalized to DMSO (nā€Š=ā€Š3). H. Alamar blue cell viability assay in cochlear explants treated with indicated concentrations of A2CE. Mean Ā± S.E.M., * p<0.05 (One way ANOVA, followed by bonferroni for means comparison).</p

    Four p27<sup>Kip1</sup> inhibitors and calculated IC<sub>50</sub> values that passed all primary and secondary screens.

    No full text
    <p>The activity data for individual compounds were fit into sigmoidal dose-response curves (nā€Š=ā€Š3 per compound, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0091173#pone-0091173-g003" target="_blank">Fig. 3Cā€“F</a>) to derive IC<sub>50</sub> values.</p

    Primary screening for inhibition of p27<sup>Kip1</sup>-luciferase.

    No full text
    <p>A. Percentage of luciferase inhibition by each compound screened (12 Ī¼M), compared to positive control cycloheximide (green), and negative control DMSO (red). Arbitrary threshold was set at 50% luciferase inhibition (yellow line). Compounds which ā€œpassedā€ (blue) and ā€œfailedā€ (black) are shown. B. Percentage of alamar blue inhibition by each compound screened (12 Ī¼M) compared to positive control cyclohexamide (green), and negative control DMSO (red). Arbitrary threshold was set at 30% alamar blue inhibition (yellow line). Compounds which inhibited alamar blue more than 30% ā€œfailedā€ (blue), and less than 30% ā€œpassedā€ (black).</p
    corecore