Predictive Response to Immunotherapy Score: A Useful Tool for Identifying Eligible Patients for Allergen Immunotherapy

A specific predictive tool of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) outcome has not been identified yet. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a disease score referred to as Predictive Response to Immunotherapy Score (PRIS) to predict the response to AIT and identify eligible patients. A total of 110 patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis with or without concomitant asthma were enrolled in this study. Before beginning sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), patients were evaluated by analyzing clinical and laboratory parameters. A specific rating was assigned to each parameter to be combined in a total score named PRIS. At baseline (T0) and follow-up [after 12 (T12) and 24 months (T24) of SLIT], a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to calculate a mean symptom score (MSS). Finally, the percentage variation between the MSS at T0 and at T12 [ΔMSS-12(%)] and T24 [ΔMSS-24 (%)] was measured. We observed a significant improvement of symptoms at T12 and T24 compared to T0 in all groups undergoing SLIT. PRIS was effective in predicting ΔMSS-24 (%) in patients treated with single-allergen SLIT. In addition, PRIS was effective in predicting ΔMSS-24 (%) in both patients with only rhinitis and with concomitant asthma. PRIS assessment can represent a useful tool to individuate potential responders before SLIT prescription

Use of narrative medicine to identify key factors for effective doctor–patient relationships in severe asthma

Background: In this project the authors use a narrative medicine (NM) approach to assess the promotion of trust in the relationship between physicians and their asthma patients. Methods: Following a NM educational course for physicians, a research was carried out in which at least 5 written narratives (parallel charts) for each participating physician were collected and qualitatively analysed according to Bury's classification and the Grounded Theory. Results: The results of this study were of speculative and clinical interest. In particular, 66 participants wrote 314 narratives (246 on adult and 68 on paediatric patients). As a result of applying the NM approach, when the relationships remained problematic, many physicians wrote with a moral style about their adult (67%), and paediatric patients (33%) - especially in cases of asthmatic children's or adolescents' overprotective or absent families (40%) -. On the contrary, physicians who were able to listen to their patients with empathy (35%) made more shared decisions with patients, even with those they initially had a bad relationship. The used words of welcome, interest and acceptance were promoting patients' trust that lead to restoring their activities in 45% of cases, according to physicians self-reporting. Conclusions: These approaches of NM are useful in daily clinical practice, with the goal of improving the quality of life (QOL) of patients with severe asthma, even in cases in which the doctor-patient relationship isn't initially good

Local Allergic Rhinitis: A Different Rhinitis Endotype? Literature Overview

Chronic rhinitis (CR) is commonly divided into allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR). AR is triggered by the immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated response to allergens, whereas NAR is characterized by the absence of allergic sensitization. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of local IgE in the nasal mucosa of patients suffering from typical allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms but without a history of atopy and a positive response to a nasal allergen challenge (NAC). This condition was recently defined as local allergic rhinitis (LAR), which is supposed to be a different CR characterized by a type 2 (T2) inflammation response with the release of typical T2 mediators. LAR is defined as a phenotype of AR characterized by a localized nasal allergic response that is negative skin prick testing to allergens in the absence of serum-specific IgE. Diagnosis is based on a positive response to NAC. This review is an update of LAR literature, focusing on the definition of LAR as an independent endotype. LAR, AR, and NAR are characterized by the same clinical symptoms, although there are some differences between these three subtypes. However, the literature data are not yet univocal in defining LAR as an independent endotype

The Role of Omalizumab in Patients With Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss): Comment on the Article by Jachiet et al

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a systemic vasculitis characterized by asthma and blood eosinophilia, with the lung being the organ most frequently affected. Oral glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressive drugs are the mainstay therapy of EGPA. Occasional reports suggest that EGPA patients can be treated with omalizumab in addition to conventional therapy to achieve asthma control. In patients with EGPA and moderate to severe allergic asthma, omalizumab can be beneficial and safe. It enables corticosteroid tapering while decreasing eosinophilia and improving asthma symptoms

Omalizumab in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A 36-month follow-up study

Objective: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a systemic vasculitis characterized by asthma and blood eosinophilia, with the lung being the organ most frequently affected. Oral glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressive drugs are the mainstay therapy of EGPA. Occasional reports suggest that EGPA patients can be treated with omalizumab in addition to conventional therapy to achieve asthma control. To investigate the long-term effects of omalizumab in patients with EGPA and asthma (2 females, 3 males, age 41-64 years), we carried out a 36-month follow-up observational study. At the time of enrollment, the patients were on maintenance therapy and had moderate to severe allergic asthma, eosinophilia and rhinosinusitis. Mononeuropathy/polyneuropathy and/or histological evidence of tissue eosinophilic infiltration were also present. Methods: Patients were treated with omalizumab (300-600 mg s.c. every 2-4 weeks) as add-on therapy to prednisone, inhaled steroids and bronchodilators. During omalizumab treatment, spirometry, the asthma control test (ACT) score and eosinophilia were evaluated, and prednisone dosage was recorded. Results: During the 36 months of omalizumab treatment asthma progressively improved as indicated by spirometry and the ACT score. Eosinophilia progressively decreased. The oral prednisone dose was reduced or withdrawn during treatment. No adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: In patients with EGPA and moderate to severe allergic asthma, omalizumab can be beneficial and safe. It enables corticosteroid tapering while decreasing eosinophilia and improving asthma symptoms over 36 months

Omalizumab chronic spontaneous urticaria: Efficacy, safety, predictors of treatment outcome, and time to response

Background: Omalizumab is a recombinant anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody used in the treatment of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Objective: This multicentric study assessed the safety and efficacy of omalizumab in patients (n=322) with CSU refractory to second-generation antihistamines, also investigating predictors of poor treatment outcome and time lag to response to anti-IgE therapy by serum auto-reactivity. Methods: This retrospective observational study comprised a 4-week pretreatment period, a 24-week treatment period with omalizumab (300 mg/month), and a 16-week follow-up period. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean and median change in 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7), weekly itch severity score (ISS), and hive score from baseline to 4-, 12-, and 24-week values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients (defined “responders”) with well-controlled urticaria (UAS7 ≤ 6) and complete treatment response (UAS7=0). Safety in terms of side effects was also assessed. Results: Omalizumab significantly and consistently reduced the mean UAS7, ISS, and hive score from baseline to weeks 4, 12, and 24, with a clear decreasing trend over time. At the end of the treatment period (week 24), 84.2% of patients had a UAS7 score of 6 or less and 66.7% had a UAS7 of 0. Higher pretreatment IgE levels were less likely to be associated with poor treatment response (ie, UAS7 > 6). Patients with a positive autologus serum skin test (ASST) were significantly more likely to be “slow responders” to omalizumab treatment (ie, response beyond 8 days since omalizumab administration) than ASST-negative patients (P <.001). No treatment-related adverse events were recorded. Conclusion: Monitoring baseline characteristics of patients before introduction of omalizumab therapy may help to predict treatment outcome in CSU patients

SCREENING DI 12 ECOTIPI DI POMODORO (LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM) PER LA DETERMINAZIONE DELLE PROPRIETÀ ALLERGENICHE

Il pomodoro è considerato uno degli alimenti essenziali della dieta mediterranea grazie al suo elevato contenuto in antiossidanti a cui si associano effetti antitumorali e riduzione del rischio di malattie cardiovascolari. I casi di allergie al pomodoro, seppur rari, sono tuttavia in continuo aumento, rappresentando una potenziale minaccia per la salute dei consumatori. Seppur non contemplato nella direttiva UE che regolamenta l’etichettatura alimentare, il pomodoro può essere quindi considerato uno dei principali “allergeni emergenti”. Una potenziale soluzione a questo problema potrebbe essere rappresentata dall’utilizzo di varietà che manifestino una ridotta espressione delle proteine allergeniche. A tale scopo, utilizzando sieri di pazienti allergici di diversa provenienza (zona emiliana e zona campana), è stato effettuato, mediante approccio proteomico, lo screening di 12 ecotipi di pomodoro, al fine di identificare i principali allergeni coinvolti e valutare eventuali differenze nelle proprietà allergeniche delle cultivar considerate. Le analisi condotte finora hanno consentito l’identificazione di differenti proteine reattive, riportate in letteratura come noti allergeni. È emerso, inoltre, che i profili allergenici identificati sono altamente siero-specifici, per cui la capacità di ogni ecotipo di indurre o meno una risposta allergica deve essere valutata in riferimento alla specifica proteina allergenica a cui ogni singolo paziente è sensibilizzato