Tomato spotted wilt and peanut bud necrosis viruses

The peanut bud necrosis virus (PBNV) nd tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), both tospoviruses, cause economically important diseases in peanut..

Identification and Incidence of Peanut Viruses in Georgia

Surveys of peanuts in Georgia in 1983 detected peanut mottle virus (PMV), peanut stripe virus (PStV), and peanut stunt virus. The mild strain of PMV was by far the most prevalent virus in commercial peanuts; it occurred in every field and an average incidence of 15-20% was observed when the growing season was about two-thirds complete. The necrosis strain of PMV was noted in 39% of the fields, but the incidence was less than 0.1%. A new severe strain of PMV (chlorotic stunt) was identified in two fields. PStV was found at four locations; in each case the infected plants were near peanut germplasm lines from The People's Republic of China. Mixed infections of PMV and PStV occurred frequently. Peanut stunt virus was noted only in one research field in 1983. Numerous serological and sap inoculation tests did not detect tomato spotted wilt virus or cowpea chlorotic mottle viru

Search for a periodic signal from Cygnus X-3 usingmuons observed underground in the Frejus detector (4800 mwe)

Periodic signals from Cygnus X-3 in the ultra high energy range were recently reported by air shower arrays and attributed to gamma rays. Although gamma rays are expected to produce muon-poor showers, the preceding observations have stimulated similar studies based on underground muons. Two groups have claimed a significant underground signal coming from Cygnus X-3. The results are, however, extremely difficult to explain in the present framework of particle physics, and clearly need confirmation. The preliminary results obtained from the Frejus underground detector during its first 16 months of operation (March 1984 to June 1985) are presented

Viruses associated with chlorotic rosette and green rosette diseases of groundnut in Nigeria

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) plants from Nigeria with chlorotic rosette disease contained a manually transmissible virus, considered to be a strain of groundnut rosette virus (GRV(C)). GRV(C) infected nine out of 32 species in three out of nine families. It caused local lesions without systemic infection in Chenopodium amaranticolor, C. murale and C. quinoa, and systemic symptoms in Glycine max, Nicotiana benthamiana, N. clevelandii and Phaseolus vulgaris as well as in groundnut. Some ‘rosette-resistant’ groundnut lines were also infected. GRV(C) was transmitted by Aphis craccivora, but only from groundnut plants that were also infected with an aphid-transmissible second virus, which was not manually transmissible and was considered to be groundnut rosette assistor virus (GRAV). Plants infected with GRAV contained isometric particles c. 25 nm in diameter which were detectable by immunosorbent electron microscopy on grids coated with antisera to several luteoviruses, especially with antisera to bean leaf roll, potato leafroll and beet western yellows viruses. No virus-like particles were observed in extracts from plants infected with GRV(C) alone. A single groundnut plant obtained from Nigeria with symptoms of green rosette contained luteovirus particles, presumed to be of GRAV, and yielded a manually transmissible virus that induced symptoms similar to those of GRV(C) in C. amaranticolor but gave only mild or symptomless infection of N. benthamiana and N. clevelandii. It was considered to be a strain of GRV and designated GRV(G)

Field Diagnosis of Groundnut Diseases

Diseases ar e major constraints to groundnut production throughout the world. This handbook is designed to assist agricultural research and extension workers, wh o may have little formal training in plant pathology, to make tentative diagnosis of diseases of groundnut caused by 31 fungi, 2 bacteria. 9 viruses, a mycoplasma-like organism, 4 nematodes, and a parasitic flowering plant. The most characteristic field symptoms of each disease are Illustrated and descr ibed. It is emphasized that for confirmation of field diagnosi s the assistance of skilled plant pathologists will be requi red in most cases

Bud Necrosis: A Disease of Groundnut Caused by Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus

This is the first ICRISAT Information Bulletin that deals with a virus disease of groundnut. Attention is focused on bud necrosis disease, caused by tomato spotted wilt virus, because of its economic significance on three continents. Epidemics build up rapidly with little warning and cause serious losses to growers. Protocols for purification and identification of the virus are given in detail. The symptoms of the disease in groundnut are illustrated. Procedures for a simple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of the virus are given. The identification of the vector insects—species of Thysanoptera (thrips)—is difficult, and is still to be fully resolved. But a key is provided as an aid in identifying seven thrips species that have been implicated as vectors of tomato spotted wilt virus on groundnut. The current situation concerning management of bud necrosis disease is outlined. Suitable insecticides, cultural practices, biological control, and host-plant resistance are discussed to assist crop protection and extension workers in formulating integrated management systems appropriate to their particular situations

Field Diagnosis of Groundnut Disease. Information Bulletin No 36(revised)

Diseases are major constraints to groundnut production throughout the world. This handbook is designed to assist agricultural research and extension workers, who may have little formal training in plant pathology, to make tentative diagnosis of diseases of groundnut caused by 29 fungi, 2 bacteria, 11 viruses, a mycoplasma-like organism, 4 nematodes, and a parasitic flowering plant. The most characteristic field symptoms of each disease are illustrated and described. It is emphasized that for confirmation of field diagnosis the assistance of skilled plant pathologists will be required in most cases

Courtship and mating behaviour of manta rays Mobula alfredi and M. birostris in the Maldives

The aim of this 14 year study was to elucidate the entire courtship and mating behaviour of manta rays Mobula alfredi and M. birostris using behavioural observations, video and photographic records. From 2003 to 2016, over 11,000 surveys were undertaken at known manta ray aggregation sites in the Maldives to record any observed manta rays reproductive activity. From 47,591 photo-ID sightings, 4,247 individual M. alfredi were identified and 226 individual M. birostris from 229 photo-ID sightings, all recorded at 22 atolls across 265 different sites. Courtship activity was observed on 206 surveys at 30 different sites. A total of 229 courtship events were recorded, with 90% (n = 205) of them occurring at cleaning sites. The observed courtship activity was categorised into seven distinct stages which are described in detail: initiation, endurance, evasion, pre-copulatory positioning, copulation, post-copulatory holding and separation. Photographs provide the first scientific record of the entirety of manta rays courtship and mating. Both M. alfredi and M. birostris appear to engage in the same elaborate courtship rituals, exhibiting the same behaviours during all stages of the courtship and mating process. KEYWORDS

Renegotiation and Relative Performance Evaluation: Why an Informative Signal may be Useless

Although Holmström's informativeness criterion provides a theoretical foundation for the controllability principle and inter firm relative performance evaluation, empirical and field studies provide only weak evidence on such practices. This paper refines the traditional informativeness criterion by abandoning the conventional full-commitment assumption. With the possibility of renegotiation, a signal's usefulness in incentive contracting depends on its information quality, not simply on whether the signal is informative. This paper derives conditions for determining when a signal is useless and when it is useful. In particular, these conditions will be met when the signal's information quality is either sufficiently poor or sufficiently rich