Liver chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma using TANDEM ® microspheres

IF 2.369 (2017)International audienceTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combines intra-arterial delivery of a chemotherapeutic agent with selective embolization to obtain a synergistic effect. TACE is recognized as the standard treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma patients at an intermediate stage. If conventional TACE, defined as the injection of an emulsion of a drug with ethiodized oil, still has a role to play, the development of drug-eluting beads has allowed many improvements and optimization of the technique. TANDEM® microspheres are second-generation drug-loadable microspheres. This device raised a special interest due to its tightly calibrated spherical microspheres, with small sizes down to 40 μm available. In this review, we describe the technical characteristics of these microspheres, analyze the scientific literature and hypothesize on the future perspectives

Neck transection level and postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study of 195 patients

International audienceBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the level of neck transection on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with pancreaticojejunostomy.Method: A total of 195 patients with an early postoperative CT scan were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 2 groups (CR-POPF and No CR-POPF) in order to seek potential risk factors for CR-POPF. We focused our analysis on the relationship between CR-POPF and the level of neck transection, defined by measuring the distance between the left side of the portal vein and the remnant pancreatic stump on the postoperative CT scan.Result: CR-POPF occurred in 58 out of 195 PD (29.7%); grade B (17%) and grade C (12.7%). The Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 morbidity rate was 33% (65/195) and the mortality rate was 2.5% (5/195). Multivariate analysis indicated that a 'right-sided' level of neck transection (P = 0.007), a firm pancreatic texture (P = 0.001), and a PD for non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma histology (P = 0.032) were independent risk factors for CR-POPF. A full neck resection with systematic transection ≥7 mm at the left side of the portal vein seems to prevent CR-POPF harboring a protective effect (OR 0.056; 95% CI 0.003 to 0.978; P = 0.039).Conclusion: Here we further consolidate the concept describing the pancreatic neck as a vascular watershed, showing that a long remnant pancreatic neck could be an independent risk factor for CR-POPF after PD (NCT03850236).Trial registration number and agency: The present study was approved by our local ethics committee and was declared on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03850236)

Level of pancreatic division and postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: A retrospective case-control study of 157 patients with non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma lesions

International audienceBACKGROUND:Several studies have suggested that the level of pancreatic division during distal pancreatectomy (DP) has an impact on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurrence. The purpose of this study was thus to investigate the level of pancreatic division as a potential risk factor for POPF after DP for non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma lesions (non-PDAC) in the era of parenchyma-sparing resection.METHODS:Data from 217 patients requiring DP were collected in a prospectively maintained database from January 1997 to December 2017 and analyzed retrospectively. Only data from patients who underwent DP using a linear stapler for non-PDAC lesions were analyzed. The outcomes of DP with body/tail division (Body-Tail group) were compared to DP with neck division (Neck group). The primary outcome was POPF according to the 2016 ISGPF.RESULTS:Data from 157 patients who underwent DP using a linear stapler for non-PDAC lesions were included for analysis. Body-Tail (n = 53) and Neck (n = 104) groups were comparable concerning demographic data, period of treatment, BMI, ASA score, comorbidities, type of lesion, median lesion size, laparoscopic or open approach and spleen preservation rate. No differences were found in POPF (5.5 and 12.5%, p = 0.388) and new-onset pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (22.5 vs. 20%; p = 0.439) in Body-Tail and Neck groups respectively.CONCLUSION:Clinically relevant POPF and postoperative diabetes do not appear to be affected by pancreatic division level. The intention to prevent POPF or pancreatogenic diabetes should not influence the decision on level of pancreatic division during DP

Challenging TIPS in Liver Transplant Recipients: The Pull-Through Technique to Address Piggyback Anastomosis

International audiencePURPOSE: The hepatic vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be challenging in liver transplant recipient patients, especially when piggyback anastomosis was performed. We described a modified technique and reviewed the clinical outcomes of TIPS in transplanted patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, 8 patients with history of liver transplantation using a three-hepatic vein piggyback technique for venous anastomosis underwent a TIPS in our institution. Indications were refractory ascites (n~=~7) or variceal bleeding (n~=~1). When the hepatic vein access failed via the standard jugular route, a pull-through technique was used: After puncturing the right hepatic vein under ultrasound guidance, a guidewire and a vascular sheath were advanced, then the guidewire was snared in the inferior vena cava and retrieved though the jugular access, and the hepatic vein was catheterized along the guidewire. The safety and technical success rates of this technique and the clinical outcomes of the study population were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: Seven of 8 patients (87.5%) required the pull-through technique to access a hepatic vein. No complications of the percutaneous access of the hepatic vein were found at the one-day and one-month ultrasound Doppler examinations. Among 7 patients who had refractory ascites, 3 had complete resolution of ascites (43%), and one had moderate improvement. One patient with refractory infected ascites on severe graft failure and one with massive bleeding died soon after the procedure. CONCLUSION: A pull-through technique following percutaneous puncture of a hepatic vein is a safe technique for performing a TIPS in liver transplant recipients with piggyback anastomosis complicated by acute hepatic vein angulation

Retrospective Voxel-Based Dosimetry for Assessing the Ability of the Body-Surface-Area Model to Predict Delivered Dose and Radioembolization Outcome

International audienc