16 research outputs found
Whatâs in it for me? Responses to collaborative work space provision in small-scale pedagogical e-research projects
Reflections on unexpected outcomes: learning from student collaboration in an online discussion forum
Visualizing strategic change in an educational development centre with product-based analysis
Feminist Art Activisms and Artivisms - 2 July 2018, Middlesex University
This event was organised by Katy Deepwell for the Create/Feminisms research cluster in the Visual Arts Department, Faculty of Arts and Creative Industries, Middlesex University
Making connections: technological interventions to support students in using, and tutors in creating, assessment feedback
This paper explores the potential of technology to enhance the assessment and feedback process for both staff and students. The âMaking Connectionsâ project aimed to better understand the connections that students make between the feedback that they receive and future assignments, and explored whether technology can help them in this activity. The project interviewed 10 tutors and 20 students, using a semi-structured approach. Data were analysed using a thematic approach, and the findings have identified a number of areas in which improvements could be made to the assessment and feedback process through the use of technology. The findings of the study cover each stage of the assessment process from the perspective of both staff and students. The findings are discussed in the context of current literature, and special attention is given to projects from the UK higher education sector intended to address the same issues.
Keywords: feed-forward; assessment; practices; technology; technology-enhanced learnin
Utopian universities: a technicistâs dream
Following a brief introduction, our paper is in four main sections. First, we lay out the points on which we agree with James Mazoue's views expressed in "The Deconstructed Campus." Second, we offer a critique of his views. Third, we consider evidence-based research opportunities for building universities that may incorporate ideas along the lines Mazoue proposes. Fourth, we summarise foreseeable barriers to creating such institutions. Thus our first and second sections are a direct response to Mazoue, while the third and fourth go beyond what he has written. We conclude that Mazoue's arguments can only be sustained by adopting a technicist's view, by seeking to control reality. We assert that a technicist is a utopian. Our view is that higher education must be modernised, to improve students' learning, but through evolution rather than revolutio