15 research outputs found

    Forest management cessation and biodiversity: a synthesis of a nationwide French project

    Get PDF
    Extending the network of strict forest reserves is one of the conservation measures promoted by the French National Strategy for Biodiversity improvement. According to the scientific literature, strict forest reserves may help preserving a part of the biodiversity that is threatened by forestry. However, this strategy is based on poor knowledge in the temperate context and available studies may suffer from methodological shortcomings. The national-scale project named "Forest management, Naturalness and Biodiversity" aims at quantifying the effects on forest structure and biodiversity of management abandonment in strict reserves. Based on a meta-analysis of worldwide literature and original data from 213 study plots set up in 15 forest sites throughout France - around half of the plots in forests left unmanaged for from 8 to 148 years (mean: 46 years)- , we analyzed the response of 7 taxonomic groups to management abandonment. The meta-analysis demonstrates that forestry affects total richness of saproxylic taxa worldwide, which is verified in our national dataset. However, management abandonment per se is not always the best explanation of the differences between managed and unmanaged forests, but other variables, notably linked to deadwood, better explain the observed patterns for saproxylic groups. For other taxa, the response is weaker and depends more on structural features than on management abandonment. In terms of policy, our project has allowed methodological advances thanks to the development of inventory and remote sensing protocols, as well as statistical methods. The dataset we have gathered is also a first comparison of structure and biodiversity between strict forest reserves and managed forests for France. This network may therefore constitute a first basis for long term biodiversity monitoring in French forests

    Quantifier la réponse de la biodiversité à l'exploitation forestiÚre

    Get PDF
    Le projet Gestion forestiÚre, Naturalité et Biodiversité a pour but d'étudier le lien entre biodiversité, exploitation forestiÚre et naturalité en comparant des parcelles exploitées à des parcelles non-exploitées (Réserves Biologiques Intégrales ou parties intégrales de Réserves Naturelles). En partenariat avec l'ONF, RNF et l'INRA, nous travaillons depuis 2008 sur des réserves intégrales soustraites à l'exploitation depuis au moins 20 ans. L'étude repose sur l'échantillonnage de 7 groupes taxonomiques : plantes vasculaires, mousses, champignons, chauve-souris, oiseaux, coléoptÚres carabiques et saproxyliques

    GNB: Projet de recherche finalisĂ©e Ă  l’interface recherche-gestion et ses interactions avec BGF

    Get PDF
    La gestion durable des forĂȘts repose largement sur la biodiversitĂ© dont le fonctionnement reste cependant encore trĂšs insuffisamment connu. Il en dĂ©coule la nĂ©cessitĂ© d’amĂ©liorer, de maniĂšre gĂ©nĂ©rale, le socle de connaissances relatif Ă  la biodiversitĂ© et, plus particuliĂšrement, d’analyser les interactions entre changement climatique, productivitĂ© forestiĂšre et biodiversitĂ© en forĂȘt. Par ailleurs, les stratĂ©gies et dĂ©cisions des acteurs influent sur ces interactions et constituent Ă©galement des objets d’étude Ă  privilĂ©gier. C’est pourquoi le programme de recherche « BiodiversitĂ©, gestion forestiĂšre et politiques publiques » a lancĂ© en 2013 un appel Ă  projets de recherche avec deux entrĂ©es : - l’une par les sciences de la nature axĂ©e sur le changement climatique, les mesures de gestion et la dynamique de la biodiversitĂ© dans les Ă©cosystĂšmes ; - l’autre par les sciences humaines et sociales sur les stratĂ©gies et dĂ©cisions des acteurs, la gouvernance et les politiques publiques correspondant Ă  la premiĂšre entrĂ©e. Le prĂ©sent colloque a pour objectifs de : - prĂ©senter les rĂ©sultats des cinq projets de recherche qui ont Ă©tĂ© sĂ©lectionnĂ©s Ă  cette occasion sur chacune des deux entrĂ©es en les accompagnant en tant que de besoin de regards complĂ©mentaires et en illustrant l’un des projets par une visite sur le terrain ; - initier une rĂ©flexion sur le progrĂšs des connaissances dans ce domaine, en s’inspirant du devenir de projets antĂ©rieurs et en identifiant les principales lacunes Ă  combler. Il se dĂ©roulera en trois sessions, chacune introduite par des exposĂ©s d’une quinzaine de minutes et conclue par une table ronde permettant un dĂ©bat avec les participants et les invitĂ©s

    Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe

    Get PDF
    Aims: Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these forests are particularly scarce and it is unclear whether they are sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand whether extant primary forests are representative of the range of naturally occurring forest types, (b) identify forest types which host enough primary forest under strict protection to meet conservation targets and (c) highlight areas where restoration is needed and feasible. Location: Europe. Methods: We combined a unique geodatabase of primary forests with maps of forest cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions and protected areas to quantify the proportion of extant primary forest across Europe\u27s forest types and to identify gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions of primary forest locations to account for underreporting of primary forests, we then highlighted areas where restoration could complement protection. Results: We found a substantial bias in primary forest distribution across forest types. Of the 54 forest types we assessed, six had no primary forest at all, and in two-thirds of forest types, less than 1% of forest was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten forest types had more than half of their primary forests strictly protected. Protecting all documented primary forests requires expanding the protected area networks by 1,132 km2 (19,194 km2 when including also predicted primary forests). Encouragingly, large areas of non-primary forest existed inside protected areas for most types, thus presenting restoration opportunities. Main conclusion: Europe\u27s primary forests are in a perilous state, as also acknowledged by EU\u27s “Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.” Yet, there are considerable opportunities for ensuring better protection and restoring primary forest structure, composition and functioning, at least partially. We advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly account for the irreplaceable nature of primary forests and ramp up protection and restoration efforts alike

    Vers un suivi multi-dispositifs de la biodiversitĂ© en forĂȘt en France mĂ©tropolitaine

    No full text
    International audienceThe "Plateforme BiodiversitĂ© pour la ForĂȘt" works to build a large biodiversity monitoring system in metropolitan french forests. The idea is to mobilize funders and to make existing monitoring system managers work together to fill the current gaps.Une rĂ©flexion sur la mise en place d'un vaste rĂ©seau de suivi de la biodiversitĂ© en forĂȘt a Ă©tĂ© lancĂ©e par la Plateforme BiodiversitĂ© pour la ForĂȘt, en France. L'idĂ©e est de mobiliser les financeurs et gestionnaires des rĂ©seaux de suivis existants tout en comblant les lacunes actuelles

    IMPACT OF DISCONTINUING LOGGING ACTIVITY ON THE DENDROMETRIC STRUCTURE OF MIXED BEECH FORESTS IN FRANCE

    No full text
    Based on a comparison between managed and unmanaged forests, the aim of our study is to provide managers with a tentative quantitative analysis of the structural differences between managed and unmanaged mixed beech forests in France from a sample of 213 plots located in 15 lowland and mountain forests. Most structural descriptors were significantly higher in unmanaged forests. There were more very large living trees (+ 105 %) in unmanaged than in managed forests. These trees were also bigger (+ 145 %). The volume of dead wood was four times higher in unmanaged forests. Because of its nationwide scope, our investigation is a first French benchmark study for biodiversity-oriented forest policy, and contributes additional knowledge to a poorly researched area in FranceBasĂ©e sur la comparaison de forĂȘts exploitĂ©es et non exploitĂ©es, l’objectif de notre Ă©tude est de fournir aux gestionnaires forestiers une premiĂšre analyse quantitative sur les diffĂ©rences structurelles des hĂȘtraies mĂ©langĂ©es exploitĂ©es et non exploitĂ©es de France, sur un dispositif d’échantillonnage de 213 placettes rĂ©parties sur 15 massifs de plaine et de montagne. La majoritĂ© des descripteurs de structure est significativement plus Ă©levĂ©e en forĂȘts non exploitĂ©es. Les trĂšs gros bois vivants sont plus nombreux (+ 105 %) et plus gros (+ 145 %) en forĂȘts non exploitĂ©es qu’en forĂȘts exploitĂ©es. Le volume de bois mort est quatre fois plus grand en forĂȘts non exploitĂ©es. De par son ampleur, notre Ă©tude constitue une premiĂšre rĂ©fĂ©rence française en soutien aux politiques de conservation de la biodiversitĂ©, et apporte une pierre supplĂ©mentaire au champ de connaissance jusqu’à prĂ©sent lacunaire en Franc
    corecore