31 research outputs found

    Low molecular weight chitosan nanoparticulate system at low N:P ratio for nontoxic polynucleotide delivery

    Get PDF
    Chitosan, a natural polymer, is a promising system for the therapeutic delivery of both plasmid DNA and synthetic small interfering RNA. Reports attempting to identify the optimal parameters of chitosan for synthetic small interfering RNA delivery were inconclusive with high molecular weight at high amine-to-phosphate (N:P) ratios apparently required for efficient transfection. Here we show, for the first time, that low molecular weight chitosan (LMW-CS) formulations at low N:P ratios are suitable for the in vitro delivery of small interfering RNA. LMW-CS nanoparticles at low N:P ratios were positively charged (ζ-potential ~20 mV) with an average size below 100 nm as demonstrated by dynamic light scattering and environmental scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Nanoparticles were spherical, a shape promoting decreased cytotoxicity and enhanced cellular uptake. Nanoparticle stability was effective for at least 20 hours at N:P ratios above two in a slightly acidic pH of 6.5. At a higher basic pH of 8, these nanoparticles were unravelled due to chitosan neutralization, exposing their polynucleotide cargo. Cellular uptake ranged from 50% to 95% in six different cell lines as measured by cytometry. Increasing chitosan molecular weight improved nanoparticle stability as well as the ability of nanoparticles to protect the oligonucleotide cargo from nucleases at supraphysiological concentrations. The highest knockdown efficiency was obtained with the specific formulation 92-10-5 that combines sufficient nuclease protection with effective intracellular release. This system attained >70% knockdown of the messenger RNA, similar to commercially available lipoplexes, without apparent cytotoxicity. Contrary to previous reports, our data demonstrate that LMW-CS at low N:P ratios are efficient and nontoxic polynucleotide delivery systems capable of transfecting a plethora of cell lines

    Metabolic Responses of Two Assisted CPR Devices Versus Manual CPR during 1-Person CPR

    Get PDF
    Prolonged, one-person CPR is exhausting and associated with decayed CPR quality over time. Active compression-decompression-CPR (ACD-CPR) requires the rescuer to actively work during both phases of CPR. We evaluated the metabolic cost of manual CPR (M-CPR), ACD-CPR1, and ACD-CPR2 (with adhesive pad) during a 10-min resuscitation period. We hypothesized that the metabolic cost for the devices would be similar to M-CPR. Twenty (10 female) participants (23.5±3.5y, 165.8±25.6cm, 72.5±12.2kg) completed 3 randomized trials with performance feedback by investigators. Expired air was analyzed for estimations of metabolic cost via indirect calorimetry. Participants rested for 10 minutes before the baseline data collection followed by 10 min of CPR to simulate one-person CPR. Treatment effects were observed for VO2, METS, VCO2, HR, RR, blood lactate, and RPE. No such effect was observed for RQ, SBP, or DBP. VO2 (ml/kgBW/min) was significantly higher with ACD-CPR1 (17.8±1.4) vs. MCPR and ACD-CPR2 (15.9±0.9 and 14.2±1.1, respectively). Metabolic equivalent (MET) was significantly lower with ACD-CPR2 (4.1±0.3) vs. MCPR and ACD-CPR1 (4.7±0.3 and 5.1±0.4, respectively). All three groups’ blood lactate data differed significantly with ACD-CPR1 \u3e M-CPR \u3e ACD-CPR2. The RR required by the ACD-CPR1 during a 10 min CPR simulation is significantly higher than the ACD-CPR2 and M-CPR. No group differences were observed for RQ, SBP, or DBP. CPR performance metrics were averaged over the 10-min resuscitation period. RPE was significantly higher following ACD-CPR1 compared to both M-CPR and ACD-CPR2. The metabolic work required by the ACD-CPR2 during 10-min simulated one-person resuscitation (80/min) is far less than the ACD-CPR1. However, the ACD-CPR2 metabolic cost is similar to that of M-CPR, despite the latter method’s higher rate of compressions (110/min) and passive decompressions

    Safety and Efficacy of Dolutegravir in Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Raltegravir-Resistant HIV Type 1 Infection: 24-Week Results of the VIKING Study

    Get PDF
    Background. Dolutegravir (DTG; S/GSK1349572), a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitor, has limited cross-resistance to raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir in vitro. This phase IIb study assessed the activity of DTG in HIV-1–infected subjects with genotypic evidence of RAL resistance.Methods. Subjects received DTG 50 mg once daily (cohort I) or 50 mg twice daily (cohort II) while continuing a failing regimen (without RAL) through day 10, after which the background regimen was optimized, when feasible, for cohort I, and at least 1 fully active drug was mandated for cohort II. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects on day 11 in whom the plasma HIV-1 RNA load decreased by ≥0.7 log10 copies/mL from baseline or was <400 copies/mL.Results. A rapid antiviral response was observed. More subjects achieved the primary end point in cohort II (23 of 24 [96%]), compared with cohort I (21 of 27 [78%]) at day 11. At week 24, 41% and 75% of subjects had an HIV-1 RNA load of <50 copies/mL in cohorts I and II, respectively. Further integrase genotypic evolution was uncommon. Dolutegravir had a good, similar safety profile with each dosing regimen.Conclusion. Dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily with an optimized background provided greater and more durable benefit than the once-daily regimen. These data are the first clinical demonstration of the activity of any integrase inhibitor in subjects with HIV-1 resistant to RAL

    Safety and Efficacy of Dolutegravir in Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Raltegravir-Resistant HIV Type 1 Infection: 24-Week Results of the VIKING Study

    No full text
    Background. Dolutegravir (DTG; S/GSK1349572), a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitor, has limited cross-resistance to raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir in vitro. This phase IIb study assessed the activity of DTG in HIV-1–infected subjects with genotypic evidence of RAL resistance. Methods. Subjects received DTG 50 mg once daily (cohort I) or 50 mg twice daily (cohort II) while continuing a failing regimen (without RAL) through day 10, after which the background regimen was optimized, when feasible, for cohort I, and at least 1 fully active drug was mandated for cohort II. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects on day 11 in whom the plasma HIV-1 RNA load decreased by ≥0.7 log(10) copies/mL from baseline or was <400 copies/mL. Results. A rapid antiviral response was observed. More subjects achieved the primary end point in cohort II (23 of 24 [96%]), compared with cohort I (21 of 27 [78%]) at day 11. At week 24, 41% and 75% of subjects had an HIV-1 RNA load of <50 copies/mL in cohorts I and II, respectively. Further integrase genotypic evolution was uncommon. Dolutegravir had a good, similar safety profile with each dosing regimen. Conclusion. Dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily with an optimized background provided greater and more durable benefit than the once-daily regimen. These data are the first clinical demonstration of the activity of any integrase inhibitor in subjects with HIV-1 resistant to RAL

    Impact of suppressive herpes therapy on genital HIV-1 RNA among women taking antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a causal relationship between herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) and increased genital HIV-1-RNA shedding in women on HAART. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of herpes-suppressive therapy (valacyclovir 500 mg twice a day) in HIV-1/HSV-2-infected women taking HAART in Burkina Faso. METHODS: Participants were followed for a total of 12 biweekly visits before and after randomization. The presence and frequency of genital and plasma HIV-1 RNA, and of genital HSV-2 were assessed using summary measures, adjusting for baseline values. Random effect linear regression models were used to assess the impact of treatment on genital and plasma viral loads among visits with detectable virus. RESULTS: Sixty women were enrolled into the trial. Their median CD4 lymphocyte count was 228 cells/mul, and 83% had undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA at baseline. Valacyclovir reduced the proportion of visits with detectable genital HSV-2 DNA [odds ratio (OR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13, 1.05], but had no significant impact on the frequency (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.31, 2.62) or quantity (reduction of 0.33 log copies/ml, 95% CI -0.81, 0.16) of genital HIV-1 RNA. However, according to pre-defined secondary analyses restricted to women who shed HIV-1 at least once in the baseline phase, valacyclovir reduced both the proportion of visits with detectable HIV-1 shedding (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07, 0.99) and the quantity of genital HIV-1 RNA during these visits (-0.71 log10 copies/ml, 95% CI -1.27, -0.14). CONCLUSION: HSV-2 facilitates residual genital HIV-1 replication among dually infected women taking HAART despite HIV-1 suppression at the systemic level
    corecore