Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi

This article is the ninth in the series of Fungal Diversity Notes, where 107 taxa distributed in three phyla, nine classes, 31 orders and 57 families are described and illustrated. Taxa described in the present study include 12 new genera, 74 new species, three new combinations, two reference specimens, a re-circumscription of the epitype, and 15 records of sexualasexual morph connections, new hosts and new geographical distributions. Twelve new genera comprise Brunneofusispora, Brunneomurispora, Liua, Lonicericola, Neoeutypella, Paratrimmatostroma, Parazalerion, Proliferophorum, Pseudoastrosphaeriellopsis, Septomelanconiella, Velebitea and Vicosamyces. Seventy-four new species are Agaricus memnonius, A. langensis, Aleurodiscus patagonicus, Amanita flavoalba, A. subtropicana, Amphisphaeria mangrovei, Baorangia major, Bartalinia kunmingensis, Brunneofusispora sinensis, Brunneomurispora lonicerae, Capronia camelliaeyunnanensis, Clavulina thindii, Coniochaeta simbalensis, Conlarium thailandense, Coprinus trigonosporus, Liua muriformis, Cyphellophora filicis, Cytospora ulmicola, Dacrymyces invisibilis, Dictyocheirospora metroxylonis, Distoseptispora thysanolaenae, Emericellopsis koreana, Galiicola baoshanensis, Hygrocybe lucida, Hypoxylon teeravasati, Hyweljonesia indica, Keissleriella caraganae, Lactarius olivaceopallidus, Lactifluus midnapurensis, Lembosia brigadeirensis, Leptosphaeria urticae, Lonicericola hyaloseptispora, Lophiotrema mucilaginosis, Marasmiellus bicoloripes, Marasmius indojasminodorus, Micropeltis phetchaburiensis, Mucor orantomantidis, Murilentithecium lonicerae, Neobambusicola brunnea, Neoeutypella baoshanensis, Neoroussoella heveae, Neosetophoma lonicerae, Ophiobolus malleolus, Parabambusicola thysanolaenae, Paratrimmatostroma kunmingensis, Parazalerion indica, Penicillium dokdoense, Peroneutypa mangrovei, Phaeosphaeria cycadis, Phanerochaete australosanguinea, Plectosphaerella kunmingensis, Plenodomus artemisiae, P. lijiangensis, Proliferophorum thailandicum, Pseudoastrosphaeriellopsis kaveriana, Pseudohelicomyces menglunicus, Pseudoplagiostoma mangiferae, Robillarda mangiferae, Roussoella elaeicola, Russula choptae, R. uttarakhandia, Septomelanconiella thailandica, Spencermartinsia acericola, Sphaerellopsis isthmospora, Thozetella lithocarpi, Trechispora echinospora, Tremellochaete atlantica, Trichoderma koreanum, T. pinicola, T. rugulosum, Velebitea chrysotexta, Vicosamyces venturisporus, Wojnowiciella kunmingensis and Zopfiella indica. Three new combinations are Baorangia rufomaculata, Lanmaoa pallidorosea and Wojnowiciella rosicola. The reference specimens of Canalisporium kenyense and Tamsiniella labiosa are designated. The epitype of Sarcopeziza sicula is re-circumscribed based on cyto- and histochemical analyses. The sexual-asexual morph connection of Plenodomus sinensis is reported from ferns and Cirsium for the first time. In addition, the new host records and country records are Amanita altipes, A. melleialba, Amarenomyces dactylidis, Chaetosphaeria panamensis, Coniella vitis, Coprinopsis kubickae, Dothiorella sarmentorum, Leptobacillium leptobactrum var. calidus, Muyocopron lithocarpi, Neoroussoella solani, Periconia cortaderiae, Phragmocamarosporium hederae, Sphaerellopsis paraphysata and Sphaeropsis eucalypticola

Tumidispora Hongsanan & K. D. Hyde

<i>Tumidispora</i> Hongsanan & K.D. Hyde <p> Ariyawansa <i>et al</i>. (2015) introduced <i>Tumidispora</i> to include the generic type <i>T</i>. <i>shoreae</i>, which was isolated from <i>Shorea</i> species in Thailand. <i>Tumidispora</i> has brown to dark brown thyriothecia, with a prominent darkened area around the central ostiole, fissitunicate, cylindrical to cylindric-clavate, short pedicellate asci and 1–2-seriate, hyaline, 1-septate ascospores (constricted at the septum) with an apical swollen cell (Ariyawansa <i>et al</i>. 2015). There is currently only the type species in this genus (Index Fungorum 2022). In this study, we introduce <i>T</i>. <i>thailandica</i> <i>sp</i>. <i>nov</i>. from <i>Dimocarpus longan</i> in Thailand.</p>Published as part of <i>Tennakoon, Danushka S., Hongsanan, Sinang, De Silva, Nimali I., Suwannarach, Nakarin & Lumyong, Saisamorn, 2023, Molecular phylogeny and morphological characterization of Paramicrothyrium bambusae sp. nov. and Tumidispora thailandica sp. nov. from leaf litter, pp. 112-124 in Phytotaxa 578 (1)</i> on page 118, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.578.1.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7517738">http://zenodo.org/record/7517738</a&gt

Paramicrothyrium bambusae Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong 2023, sp. nov.

<i>Paramicrothyrium bambusae</i> Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong <i>sp</i>. <i>nov</i>. (FIGURE 2) <p> <i>Index Fungorum Number</i>: IF559725; <i>Facesoffungi number</i>: FoF11795</p> <p> <i>Etymology</i>:—Name reflects the host genus <i>Bambusa</i>.</p> <p> <i>Holotype</i>:— MFLU 19-2729</p> <p> <i>Epiphytic</i> on the upper surface of dead leaves of <i>Bambusa vulgaris</i> Schrad. (<i>Poaceae</i>), visible as small black dots. <b>Sexual morph</b>: Undetermined. <b>Asexual morph</b>: <i>Thyriothecia</i> 90–120 × 100–130 μm (<i>x</i> = 110 × 112 µm, <i>n</i> = 10), solitary, scattered, superficial, flattened, circular, dark brown to black, easily be removed from the substrate, poorly developed basal layer, with irregular, central ostiole, dark brown, irregularly rounded at the margin. <i>Upper wall</i> comprises brown cells of <i>textura angularis</i>, radiating in irregular, parallel lines from center to the outer rim. <i>Conidiogenous cells</i> evanescent. <i>Conidia</i> 3–4 × 1–2 µm (<i>x</i> <b>=</b> 3.7 × 1.2 μm, <i>n</i> = 30), hyaline, cylindrical with obtuse ends, unicellular, minute guttulate, straight or slightly curved, smooth-walled.</p> <p> <i>Culture characteristics</i>:— <i>Colonies</i> on PDA, 10–12 mm diam. after 4 weeks at 25 °C, colonies from above: medium dense, circular, raised, cottony, surface smooth, entire margin, white to cream at margin, white at center; reverse: white to yellowish at margin, light brown at center. <i>Mycelium</i> white to cream with tufting.</p> <p> <i>Material examined</i>:— Thailand, Chiang Mai, dead leaves of <i>Bambusa vulgaris</i> (<i>Poaceae</i>), 28 September 2018, D.S. Tennakoon, ADS046A (MFLU 19-2729, <b>holotype</b>); ex-type living culture, SDBR-CMU436. <i>ibid</i>. 29 September 2019, ADS046B (NCYU 19-0085, <b>paratype</b>); ex-paratype living culture, SDBR-CMU437.</p> <p> <i>GenBank numbers</i>:—MFLU 19-2729: ITS: ON751741; NCYU 19-0085: ITS: ON751742.</p> <p> <i>Notes</i>:—The phylogeny indicates that <i>Paramicrothyrium bambusae</i> (MFLU 19-2729 and NCYU 19-0085) forms a distinct lineage sister to <i>P</i>. <i>chinensis</i> isolates (IFRDCC2258 and IA20) with robust statistical support (100% ML, 99% MP, 1.00 BYPP, FIGURE 1). The morphology of <i>P</i>. <i>bambusae</i> fits well with the type species in having circular, dark brown to black thyriothecia with an irregular ostiole, without a darkened ring (Wu <i>et al</i>. 2011). However, we were unable to compare <i>P</i>. <i>chinensis</i> to the asexual morph of <i>P</i>. <i>bambusae</i>, since only the sexual morph was available for that species (Wu <i>et al</i>. 2011). Therefore, we compared the base pair differences between <i>P</i>. <i>bambusae</i> and <i>P</i>. <i>chinensis</i> and there were 25 base pair differences (4.14%) across 603 nucleotides across the ITS (+ 5.8S) gene region. In addition, <i>P</i>. <i>bambusae</i> has smaller thyriothecia (90–120 × 100–130 μm), whereas <i>P</i>. <i>chinensis</i> has significantly larger thyriothecia (420–590 μm diam.) (Wu <i>et al</i>. 2011). However, further collections are needed to clarify the sexual and asexual connection of <i>Paramicrothyrium</i> species.</p>Published as part of <i>Tennakoon, Danushka S., Hongsanan, Sinang, De Silva, Nimali I., Suwannarach, Nakarin & Lumyong, Saisamorn, 2023, Molecular phylogeny and morphological characterization of Paramicrothyrium bambusae sp. nov. and Tumidispora thailandica sp. nov. from leaf litter, pp. 112-124 in Phytotaxa 578 (1)</i> on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.578.1.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7517738">http://zenodo.org/record/7517738</a&gt

Paramicrothyrium bambusae Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong 2023, sp. nov.

Paramicrothyrium bambusae Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong sp. nov. (FIGURE 2) Index Fungorum Number: IF559725; Facesoffungi number: FoF11795 Etymology:—Name reflects the host genus Bambusa. Holotype:— MFLU 19-2729 Epiphytic on the upper surface of dead leaves of Bambusa vulgaris Schrad. (Poaceae), visible as small black dots. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Thyriothecia 90–120 × 100–130 μm (x = 110 × 112 µm, n = 10), solitary, scattered, superficial, flattened, circular, dark brown to black, easily be removed from the substrate, poorly developed basal layer, with irregular, central ostiole, dark brown, irregularly rounded at the margin. Upper wall comprises brown cells of textura angularis, radiating in irregular, parallel lines from center to the outer rim. Conidiogenous cells evanescent. Conidia 3–4 × 1–2 µm (x = 3.7 × 1.2 μm, n = 30), hyaline, cylindrical with obtuse ends, unicellular, minute guttulate, straight or slightly curved, smooth-walled. Culture characteristics:— Colonies on PDA, 10–12 mm diam. after 4 weeks at 25 °C, colonies from above: medium dense, circular, raised, cottony, surface smooth, entire margin, white to cream at margin, white at center; reverse: white to yellowish at margin, light brown at center. Mycelium white to cream with tufting. Material examined:— Thailand, Chiang Mai, dead leaves of Bambusa vulgaris (Poaceae), 28 September 2018, D.S. Tennakoon, ADS046A (MFLU 19-2729, holotype); ex-type living culture, SDBR-CMU436. ibid. 29 September 2019, ADS046B (NCYU 19-0085, paratype); ex-paratype living culture, SDBR-CMU437. GenBank numbers:—MFLU 19-2729: ITS: ON751741; NCYU 19-0085: ITS: ON751742. Notes:—The phylogeny indicates that Paramicrothyrium bambusae (MFLU 19-2729 and NCYU 19-0085) forms a distinct lineage sister to P. chinensis isolates (IFRDCC2258 and IA20) with robust statistical support (100% ML, 99% MP, 1.00 BYPP, FIGURE 1). The morphology of P. bambusae fits well with the type species in having circular, dark brown to black thyriothecia with an irregular ostiole, without a darkened ring (Wu et al. 2011). However, we were unable to compare P. chinensis to the asexual morph of P. bambusae, since only the sexual morph was available for that species (Wu et al. 2011). Therefore, we compared the base pair differences between P. bambusae and P. chinensis and there were 25 base pair differences (4.14%) across 603 nucleotides across the ITS (+ 5.8S) gene region. In addition, P. bambusae has smaller thyriothecia (90–120 × 100–130 μm), whereas P. chinensis has significantly larger thyriothecia (420–590 μm diam.) (Wu et al. 2011). However, further collections are needed to clarify the sexual and asexual connection of Paramicrothyrium species.Published as part of Tennakoon, Danushka S., Hongsanan, Sinang, De Silva, Nimali I., Suwannarach, Nakarin & Lumyong, Saisamorn, 2023, Molecular phylogeny and morphological characterization of Paramicrothyrium bambusae sp. nov. and Tumidispora thailandica sp. nov. from leaf litter, pp. 112-124 in Phytotaxa 578 (1) on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.578.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/751773

Paramicrothyrium H. X. Wu & K. D. Hyde

<i>Paramicrothyrium</i> H.X. Wu & K.D. Hyde <p> Wu <i>et al</i>. (2011) established this as a monotypic genus to include <i>Paramicrothyrium chinensis</i>, which has irregular ostioles without a darkened ring. Currently, only the type is available in <i>Paramicrothyrium</i> (Index Fungorum 2022). In this study, we introduce <i>Paramicrothyrium bambusae sp. nov.</i> from dead leaves of <i>Bambusa vulgaris</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Tennakoon, Danushka S., Hongsanan, Sinang, De Silva, Nimali I., Suwannarach, Nakarin & Lumyong, Saisamorn, 2023, Molecular phylogeny and morphological characterization of Paramicrothyrium bambusae sp. nov. and Tumidispora thailandica sp. nov. from leaf litter, pp. 112-124 in Phytotaxa 578 (1)</i> on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.578.1.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7517738">http://zenodo.org/record/7517738</a&gt

Tumidispora thailandica Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong 2023, sp. nov.

<i>Tumidispora thailandica</i> Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong <i>sp</i>. <i>nov</i>. (FIGURE 3) <p> <i>Index Fungorum Number</i>: IF559726; <i>Facesoffungi number</i>: FoF11796</p> <p> <i>Etymology</i>:—The specific epithet “ <i>thailandica</i> ” refer to the country in which the fungus was first collected</p> <p> <i>Holotype</i>:— MFLU 19-2771</p> <p> <i>Epiphytic</i> on the upper surface of dead leaves of <i>Dimocarpus longan</i> Lour. (<i>Sapindaceae</i>), visible as small black dots. <i>Superficial hyphae</i> absent. <b>Sexual morph</b>: <i>Thyriothecia</i> 200–260 × 210–280 μm (<i>x</i> = 230 × 240 µm, <i>n</i> = 10), solitary, superficial, scattered, flattened, circular, brown to black, easily be removed from the substrate, poorly developed basal layer, with prominent, darker, central ostiole, darker around the ostiole, dark brown towards the outer lighter rim, irregularly rounded at the margin. <i>Upper wall</i> containing brown cells of <i>textura angularis</i>, radiating in slightly irregular, parallel lines from center to the outer rim. <i>Hamathecium</i> containing 2 μm wide, branched pseudoparaphyses. <i>Asci</i> 40–46 × 5–7 μm (<i>x</i> = 45 × 6 µm, <i>n</i> = 20), 8-spored, fissitunicate, bitunicate, short pedicellate, cylindrical to cylindric-clavate, apically rounded, with an ocular chamber. <i>Ascospores</i> 9–11 × 3–4 μm (<i>x</i> = 10.5 × 3.5 µm, <i>n</i> = 10), 1–2-seriate, hyaline, fusiform, rounded ends, 1-septate, constricted at the septum, apical cell swollen and wider, basal cell sub-conical, guttulate, two appendages in upper cell, smooth-walled. <b>Asexual morph</b>: Undetermined.</p> <p> <i>Culture characteristics</i>:— <i>Colonies</i> on PDA, 18–22 mm diam. after 4 weeks at 25 °C, colonies from above: medium dense, circular, raised, surface smooth, entire margin, light green at margin, dark grey to brown at centre; reverse: light brown to light green at margin, dark grey to black at centre. <i>Mycelium</i> dark grey to black with tufting.</p> <p> <i>Material examined</i>:— Thailand, Chiang Mai, dead leaves of <i>Dimocarpus longan</i> (<i>Sapindaceae</i>), 25 April 2018, D.S. Tennakoon, DHAY021A (MFLU 19-2771, <b>holotype</b>); ex-type living culture, SDBR-CMU438. <i>ibid</i>. 28 April 2018, DHAY021B (NCYU 19-0090, <b>paratype</b>); ex-paratype living culture, SDBR-CMU439.</p> <p> <i>GenBank numbers</i>:—MFLU 19-2771: LSU: ON751750; ITS: ON751739; NCYU 19-0090: LSU: ON751751; ITS: ON751740.</p> <p> Notes:—The morphological characteristics of our collection (MFLU 19-2771 and NCYU 19-0090) tally well with the generic concept of <i>Tumidispora</i>, by having flattened, circular, brown to black thyriothecia, cylindrical to cylindricclavate, short pedicellate asci and 1-septate, hyaline ascospores with a swollen apical cell (Ariyawansa <i>et al</i>. 2015). But our collection can be distinguished from the type (<i>T</i>. <i>shoreae</i>) in having shorter asci (40–46 × 5–7 μm <i>vs</i> 53–55 × 7–8 μm) and ascospores (9–11 × 3–4 μm <i>vs</i> 14–15 × 4–5 μm). In addition, our collection ascospores are distinctly fusiform with rounded ends and consist of two appendages in the upper cell, whereas <i>T</i>. <i>shoreae</i> has narrowly fusiform ascospores with sub-papillate ends and lacking appendages (Ariyawansa <i>et al.</i> 2015). Phylogeny results show that our collection (MFLU 19-2771 and NCYU 19-0090) forms an independent lineage sister to <i>T</i>. <i>shoreae</i> isolates (MFLUCC 12-0409 and MFLUCC 14-0574) with strong statistical support (100% ML, 100% MP, 1.00 BYPP, FIGURE 1). Thus, we introduce our collection (MFLU 19-2771 and NCYU 19-0090) as a new species, <i>T</i>. <i>thailandica</i> from the dead leaves of <i>Dimocarpus longan</i> in Thailand.</p>Published as part of <i>Tennakoon, Danushka S., Hongsanan, Sinang, De Silva, Nimali I., Suwannarach, Nakarin & Lumyong, Saisamorn, 2023, Molecular phylogeny and morphological characterization of Paramicrothyrium bambusae sp. nov. and Tumidispora thailandica sp. nov. from leaf litter, pp. 112-124 in Phytotaxa 578 (1)</i> on pages 118-119, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.578.1.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7517738">http://zenodo.org/record/7517738</a&gt

Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Appraisal of Dothideomycetous Fungi Associated with <i>Magnolia</i>, <i>Lilium longiflorum</i> and <i>Hedychium coronarium</i>

This paper highlights the taxonomy of some interesting saprobic microfungi associated with dead plant materials of Hedychium coronarium, Lilium longiflorum, and Magnolia species. The taxa reported in this study belong to the orders Pleosporales and Kirschsteiniotheliales (Dothideomycetes). These taxa were identified based on multi-locus phylogeny of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (LSU, SSU, and ITS) and protein-coding genes (tef1-α and rpb2), together with comprehensive morphological characterization. Two novel saprobic species, Leptoparies magnoliae sp. nov. and Neobambusicola magnoliae sp. nov., are introduced from Magnolia species in Thailand. Another new species, Asymmetrispora zingiberacearum sp. nov., is also described from dead stems of H. coronarium, which is the first asexual morph species of the genus Asymmetrispora. In addition, Ramusculicola thailandica and Kirschsteiniothelia thailandica are reported as new host records from dead twigs of Magnolia species. Sphaerellopsis paraphysata is reported as a new host record from L. longiflorum. Newly described taxa are compared with other similar species and detailed descriptions, micrographs, and phylogenetic trees to show the positions are provided

The Faces of Fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts

Taxonomic names are key links between various databases that store information on different organisms. Several global fungal nomenclural and taxonomic databases (notably Index Fungorum, Species Fungorum and MycoBank) can be sourced to find taxonomic details about fungi, while DNA sequence data can be sourced from NCBI, EBI and UNITE databases. Although the sequence data may be linked to a name, the quality of the metadata is variable and generally there is no corresponding link to images, descriptions or herbarium material. There is generally no way to establish the accuracy of the names in these genomic databases, other than whether the submission is from a reputable source. To tackle this problem, a new database (FacesofFungi), accessible at www.​facesoffungi.​org (FoF) has been established. This fungal database allows deposition of taxonomic data, phenotypic details and other useful data, which will enhance our current taxonomic understanding and ultimately enable mycologists to gain better and updated insights into the current fungal classification system. In addition, the database will also allow access to comprehensive metadata including descriptions of voucher and type specimens. This database is user-friendly, providing links and easy access between taxonomic ranks, with the classification system based primarily on molecular data (from the literature and via updated web-based phylogenetic trees), and to a lesser extent on morphological data when molecular data are unavailable. In FoF species are not only linked to the closest phylogenetic representatives, but also relevant data is provided, wherever available, on various applied aspects, such as ecological, industrial, quarantine and chemical uses. The data include the three main fungal groups (Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Basal fungi) and fungus-like organisms. The FoF webpage is an output funded by the Mushroom Research Foundation which is an NGO with seven directors with mycological expertise. The webpage has 76 curators, and with the help of these specialists, FoF will provide an updated natural classification of the fungi, with illustrated accounts of species linked to molecular data. The present paper introduces the FoF database to the scientific community and briefly reviews some of the problems associated with classification and identification of the main fungal groups. The structure and use of the database is then explained. We would like to invite all mycologists to contribute to these web pages.Fil: Jayasiri, Subashini C.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; TailandiaFil: Hyde, Kevin D.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. World Agro forestry Centre East and Central Asia Office; China. King Saud University. College of Science. Botany and Microbiology Department; Arabia SauditaFil: Ariyawansa, Hiran A.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Guizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology; ChinaFil: Bhat, Jayarama. Goa University. Department of Botany; IndiaFil: Buyck, Bart. Museum National D; FranciaFil: Romero, Andrea Irene. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Micología y Botánica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Micología y Botánica; ArgentinaFil: Taylor, Joanne E.. Royal Botanic Gardens; Reino UnidoFil: Tsui, Clement K. M.. University Of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Vizzini, Alfredo. University of Turin. Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology; ItaliaFil: Abdel wahab, Mohamed A.. Sohag University. Faculty of Science. Department of Botany and Microbiology; EgiptoFil: Wen, Tingchi. Guizhou University. Ministry of Education. Engineering Research Center of Southwest Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources; ChinaFil: Boonmee, Saranyaphat. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; TailandiaFil: Dai, Dong Qin. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. World Agro forestry Centre East and Central Asia Office; ChinaFil: Daranagama, Dinushani A.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. Chinese Academy of Sciences. Institute of Microbiology. State Key Laboratory of Mycology; ChinaFil: Dissanayake, Asha J.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. Institute of Plant and Environment Protection; ChinaFil: Ekanayaka, Anusha H.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; TailandiaFil: Fryar, S. C.. Flinders University. School of Biology; AustraliaFil: Hongsanan, Sinang. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; TailandiaFil: Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. Institute of Plant and Environment Protection; ChinaFil: Li, Wenjing. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. World Agro forestry Centre East and Central Asia Office; ChinaFil: Perera, Rekhani H.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; TailandiaFil: Phookamsak, R.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; TailandiaFil: Silva, Nimali I. de. Chiang Mai University. Faculty of Science. Department of Biology; TailandiaFil: Thambugala, Kasun M.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Guizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology; ChinaFil: Tian, Qing. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. World Agro forestry Centre East and Central Asia Office; ChinaFil: Wijayawardene, Nalin N.. Mae Fah Luang University. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research; Tailandia. Guizhou University. Ministry of Education. Engineering Research Center of Southwest Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources; ChinaFil: Zhao, Ruilin. Chinese Academy of Sciences. Institute of Microbiology. State Key Laboratory of Mycology; ChinaFil: Zhao, Qi. World Agro forestry Centre East and Central Asia Office; China. Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Science. Biotechnology and Germplasm Resources Institute; ChinaFil: Kang, Jichuan. Guizhou University. Ministry of Education. Engineering Research Center of Southwest Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources; ChinaFil: Promputtha, Itthayakorn. Chiang Mai University. Faculty of Science. Department of Biology; Tailandi