Patient-reported outcomes from the randomized phase 3 CROWN study of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Crizotinib; Lorlatinib; Patient-reported outcomesCrizotinib; Lorlatinib; Resultados informados por el pacienteCrizotinib; Lorlatinib; Resultats informats pel pacientObjectives Quality of life (QoL) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is negatively impacted by their disease and treatment side effects. We present detailed patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from the phase 3 CROWN study, which compared lorlatinib with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. Materials and methods PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire with Lung Cancer module. A longitudinal, random-intercept, random-slope, mixed-effect model assessed score changes from baseline up to (not including) end of treatment. Mean changes of absolute scores from baseline at each cycle were calculated and presented up to cycle 18 (≥ 10-point change considered clinically meaningful). Results In both lorlatinib (n = 148) and crizotinib (n = 140) arms, there were longitudinal improvements across multiple functioning and symptom scores during treatment compared with pre-treatment. Numerical improvements for most longitudinal functioning scores (physical, role, emotional, social) favored lorlatinib; cognitive functioning favored crizotinib. Numerical improvements favored lorlatinib for several symptoms (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea [clinically meaningful improvement], and cough); peripheral neuropathy favored crizotinib. Subgroup analyses showed PROs did not differ by presence/absence of baseline brain metastases. Conclusions Patients receiving first-line lorlatinib or crizotinib showed improvements and delayed deterioration in QoL, functioning, and several symptoms. Alongside the previously reported significantly longer progression-free survival and higher intracranial response rates for lorlatinib versus crizotinib, these data further support the use of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with/without baseline brain metastases and provide evidence of several QoL improvements with lorlatinib when used in the first-line setting.This study was sponsored by Pfizer. The study was designed by the sponsor, study investigators, and members of the steering committee. Data were collected by investigators and analyzed by the sponsor. All authors, including those employed by the sponsor of the study, contributed to the interpretation of the data and the development, writing, and approval of the manuscript. Medical writing support was funded by the sponsor. All authors had full access to the raw data in the study, and the corresponding author had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication

Dalla cardiochirurgia alla neurochirurgia: un caso di apoplessia ipofisaria dopo bypass aorto-coronarico con chiara evidenza RMN

n/

EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic drugs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background Results of several RCTs testing the combination of an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC were reported. Methods We first report a systematic-review and meta-analysis of all RCTs, to estimate effectiveness and toxicity of such new therapeutic approach as compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs monotherapy. Subsequently, we present a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the combination of an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug with other two new treatment-options: combination of an EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy or new EGFR-TKIs of second or third generation as monotherapy. Results Five RCTs were included in the first meta-analysis. The PFS was statistically significantly larger in patients treated with an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug as compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy: the pooled PFS-HR was 0.59 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.69). The pooled median-PFS was 17.8 months (95% CI = 16.5 to 19.3) for the combination versus 11.7 months (95% CI = 11.1 to 12.7) for EGFR-TKI as monotherapy. No statistically significant differences between the two treatment-arms were observed in terms of both OS and ORR. The rate of grade equal or higher than 3 AEs was statistically significantly higher in patients treated with EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug: the pooled-Relative Risk was 1.72 (95% CI = 1.43 to 2.06). Ten RCTs were included in the NMA. All the three experimental treatments were associated with a statistically significant improvement of PFS as compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs. When compared to each other, none of the three experimental treatments was statistically significantly associated with larger PFS or lower rate of grade ≥3AEs. Conclusion Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC derived clinically meaningful larger PFS-benefit from the addition of an anti-angiogenic drug to a first-generation EGFR-TKI, at the cost of an increase of toxicitie

Partial response to first generation SSA guides the choice and predict the outcome of second line therapy in acromegaly

Treatment of acromegaly resistant to first generation somatostatin analogues (first gen-SSA) is often difficult. We aimed to investigate the role of partial response and resistance to first gen-SSA in the choice of second line treatments and their outcomes

L'immagine medico-nucleare recettoriale guida la terapia del residuo post-chirurgico degli adenomi ipofisari non secernenti

n/

Crizotinib in MET-Deregulated or ROS1-Rearranged Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (METROS): A Phase II, Prospective, Multicenter, Two-Arms Trial.

PURPOSE: MET-deregulated NSCLC represents an urgent clinical need because of unfavorable prognosis and lack of specific therapies. Although recent studies have suggested a potential role for crizotinib in patients harboring MET amplification or exon 14 mutations, no conclusive data are currently available. This study aimed at investigating activity of crizotinib in patients harboring MET or ROS1 alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC and evidence of ROS1 rearrangements (cohort A) or MET deregulation (amplification, ratio MET/CEP7 >2.2 or MET exon 14 mutations, cohort B) were treated with crizotinib 250 mg twice daily orally. The coprimary endpoint was objective response rate in the two cohorts. RESULTS: From December 2014 to March 2017, 505 patients were screened and a total of 52 patients (26 patients per cohort) were enrolled onto the study. At data cutoff of September 2017, in cohort A, objective response rate was 65%, and median progression-free survival and overall survival were 22.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.2-30.3] and not reached, respectively. In cohort B, objective response rate was 27%, median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.0-5.8), and overall survival was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.5). No difference in any clinical endpoint was observed between MET-amplified and exon 14-mutated patients. No response was observed among the 5 patients with cooccurrence of a second gene alteration. No unexpected toxicity was observed in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib induces response in a fraction of MET-deregulated NSCLC. Additional studies and innovative therapies are urgently needed

Acromegaly is associated with increased cancer risk: A survey in Italy

It is debated if acromegalic patients have an increased risk to develop malignancies. The aim of the present study was to assess the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of different types of cancer in acromegaly on a large series of acromegalic patients managed in the somatostatin analogs era. It was evaluated the incidence of cancer in an Italian nationwide multicenter cohort study of 1512 acromegalic patients, 624 men and 888 women, mean age at diagnosis 45 \uc2\ub1 13 years, followed up for a mean of 10 years (12573 person-years) in respect to the general Italian population. Cancer was diagnosed in 124 patients, 72 women and 52 men. The SIRs for all cancers was significantly increased compared to the general Italian population (expected: 88, SIR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.68, P < 0.001). In the whole series, we found a significantly increased incidence of colorectal cancer (SIR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.07-2.58, P = 0.022), kidney cancer (SIR 2.87; 95% CI, 1.55-5.34, P < 0.001) and thyroid cancer (SIR 3.99; 95% CI, 2.32-6.87, P < 0.001). The exclusion of 11 cancers occurring before diagnosis of acromegaly (all in women) did not change remarkably the study outcome. In multivariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with an increased risk of malignancy were age and family history of cancer, with a non-significant trend for the estimated duration of acromegaly before diagnosis. In conclusion, we found evidence that acromegaly in Italy is associated with a moderate increase in cancer risk

Inflammatory bowel disease nurse specialists for patients on biological therapies: a nationwide Italian survey

Background Management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients requires a multidisciplinary approach. Among the working team, the role of IBD nurse is expected to be particularly relevant when managing patients receiving biological therapies. We performed a survey to assess the presence of IBD nurse in centers where patients were receiving biologics. Methods For this Italian nationwide survey a specific questionnaire was prepared. IBD nurse was defined as a nurse directly involved in all phases of biological therapy, from pre-therapy screening, administration and monitoring during therapy, to follow up performed by a dedicated helpline, completed a specific training on biological therapy therapy, and observed international guidelines. Results A total of 53 Italian IBD centers participated in the survey, and 91 valid questionnaires were collected. Overall, 34 (37.4%) nurses could be classified as IBD specialists. IBD nurses had a significantly higher educational level than other nurses, they were more frequently operating in Central or Southern than in Northern Italy, they were working in an Academic center rather than in a General hospital, and in IBD centers with >25 patients on biological therapy. On the contrary, mean age, gender distribution, years of nursing, and years working in the IBD unit did not significantly differ between IBD and other nurses. Conclusions Our nationwide survey showed that the presence of an IBD nurse is still lacking in the majority of Italian IBD centers where patients receive biological therapies, suggesting a prompt implementation