14 research outputs found

    Castasterone, a Plant Steroid Hormone, Affects Human Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells and Reverses Multi-Drug Resistance

    No full text
    Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a dismal prognosis, in part because of the development of multi-drug resistance. Castasterone (CAS) is the metabolic precursor of the plant steroid hormone epibrassinolide (EB). In some plants, EB accounts for the total hormone activity, whereas in other plants, CAS is the active form. The effects of CAS, a BR present in most plants, on animal cells in general and cancer cells in particular have not been described. Here, we report the effects of CAS on drug-sensitive (H69) and drug-resistant (VPA17) SCLC cells. CAS was equally cytotoxic to both cell lines (IC50 = 1 μM), indicating a lack of cross-resistance. Pre-incubation of VPA17 cells with CAS for 96 h reversed drug resistance to etoposide and doxorubicin. Synergism between CAS and EB, as well as with chemotherapy drugs, was investigated by exposure of VPA17 cells to 1:1 ratios of CAS and the other drugs at the respective IC50 values, with dilutions at 0.25 to 2.0 × IC50 and determination of the combination index (CI). CAS and EB were additive, indicating that the two drugs act on the same pathway, whereas CAS–etoposide (CI = 0.77) and CAS–doxorubicin were synergistic, indicating that CAS and the two chemotherapeutic drugs act on different pathways. Apoptosis in SCLC cells was measured by immuno-detection of single-strand DNA breaks. Following 96 h incubation of SCLC H69 cells in CAS, the level of DNA breaks was similar to measurements made after incubation in EB and etoposide, indicating that CAS is pro-apoptotic. Incubation of SCLC cells in CAS led to a time-dependent reduction (by 80%) in the transcriptional activator β-catenin. These data indicate that CAS may act via Wnt signaling. Taken together, our study reveals that CAS is pharmacologically active in both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant SCLC cells

    Cell biology: organelle structure and function

    No full text
    xvii+698hlm.;25c

    Plants Genes and Crop Biotechnology

    No full text
    xxiv,562 hal,;ill,;28c

    Life The Science Of Biology

    No full text
    428 hal,;ill,;27 c

    Mechanism-Driven and Clinically Focused Development of Botanical Foods as Multitarget Anticancer Medicine: Collective Perspectives and Insights from Preclinical Studies, IND Applications and Early-Phase Clinical Trials

    No full text
    Cancer progression and mortality remain challenging because of current obstacles and limitations in cancer treatment. Continuous efforts are being made to explore complementary and alternative approaches to alleviate the suffering of cancer patients. Epidemiological and nutritional studies have indicated that consuming botanical foods is linked to a lower risk of cancer incidence and/or improved cancer prognosis after diagnosis. From these observations, a variety of preclinical and clinical studies have been carried out to evaluate the potential of botanical food products as anticancer medicines. Unfortunately, many investigations have been poorly designed, and encouraging preclinical results have not been translated into clinical success. Botanical products contain a wide variety of chemicals, making them more difficult to study than traditional drugs. In this review, with the consideration of the regulatory framework of the USFDA, we share our collective experiences and lessons learned from 20 years of defining anticancer foods, focusing on the critical aspects of preclinical studies that are required for an IND application, as well as the checkpoints needed for early-phase clinical trials. We recommend a developmental pipeline that is based on mechanisms and clinical considerations

    Mechanism-Driven and Clinically Focused Development of Botanical Foods as Multitarget Anticancer Medicine: Collective Perspectives and Insights from Preclinical Studies, IND Applications and Early-Phase Clinical Trials

    No full text
    Cancer progression and mortality remain challenging because of current obstacles and limitations in cancer treatment. Continuous efforts are being made to explore complementary and alternative approaches to alleviate the suffering of cancer patients. Epidemiological and nutritional studies have indicated that consuming botanical foods is linked to a lower risk of cancer incidence and/or improved cancer prognosis after diagnosis. From these observations, a variety of preclinical and clinical studies have been carried out to evaluate the potential of botanical food products as anticancer medicines. Unfortunately, many investigations have been poorly designed, and encouraging preclinical results have not been translated into clinical success. Botanical products contain a wide variety of chemicals, making them more difficult to study than traditional drugs. In this review, with the consideration of the regulatory framework of the USFDA, we share our collective experiences and lessons learned from 20 years of defining anticancer foods, focusing on the critical aspects of preclinical studies that are required for an IND application, as well as the checkpoints needed for early-phase clinical trials. We recommend a developmental pipeline that is based on mechanisms and clinical considerations
    corecore