Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter from feedlot cattle

Aims: This study examined 448 Campylobacter strains isolated in 1999 and 2000 from US feedlot cattle for resistance to 12 antimicrobials. Methods and Results: Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using the E-test method. Approximately 60% (n = 267) were resistant to one or more antimicrobials, and 19·6% (n = 88) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Of the Campylobacter jejuni isolates, 49·1% (n = 187) were resistant to tetracycline, 10·2% (n = 39) were resistant to nalidixic acid, 8·4% were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 1·8% (n = 7) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the other eight antimicrobials was 1·3% or less, but 14·4% (n = 55) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. In the Campylobacter coli group, 65·7% (n = 44) were resistant to tetracycline, 52·2% (n = 35) were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 22·4% (n = 15) were resistant to nalidixic acid, and 9·0% (n = 6) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the remaining eight antimicrobials was 3·0% or less, although 49·3% (n = 33) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Conclusions: Although antimicrobials are widely used in US feedlot cattle production, our results demonstrate generally low levels of resistance to a broad range of commonly used antimicrobials relative to other recent studies. Significance and Impact of the Study: Resistance data on Campylobacter isolated from this major US livestock commodity is lacking. This overview enhances current knowledge and provides a basis for further studies

Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter from feedlot cattle

Aims: This study examined 448 Campylobacter strains isolated in 1999 and 2000 from US feedlot cattle for resistance to 12 antimicrobials. Methods and Results: Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using the E-test method. Approximately 60% (n = 267) were resistant to one or more antimicrobials, and 19·6% (n = 88) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Of the Campylobacter jejuni isolates, 49·1% (n = 187) were resistant to tetracycline, 10·2% (n = 39) were resistant to nalidixic acid, 8·4% were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 1·8% (n = 7) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the other eight antimicrobials was 1·3% or less, but 14·4% (n = 55) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. In the Campylobacter coli group, 65·7% (n = 44) were resistant to tetracycline, 52·2% (n = 35) were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 22·4% (n = 15) were resistant to nalidixic acid, and 9·0% (n = 6) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the remaining eight antimicrobials was 3·0% or less, although 49·3% (n = 33) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Conclusions: Although antimicrobials are widely used in US feedlot cattle production, our results demonstrate generally low levels of resistance to a broad range of commonly used antimicrobials relative to other recent studies. Significance and Impact of the Study: Resistance data on Campylobacter isolated from this major US livestock commodity is lacking. This overview enhances current knowledge and provides a basis for further studies

Salmonella prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in swine from 5 US states from 2003 to 2005

The Collaboration in Animal Health and Food Safety Epidemiology (CAHFSE), a USDA joint program of ARS, APHIS, and FSIS was established to track food borne pathogens and monitor animal health issues. Fecal samples (n=9020) were collected and cultured for Salmonella from pens of pigs near slaughter weight (generally~ 22 weeks old) from swine farms in five U.S. states. A prevalence of 8.0, 10.1, and 8.5% was observed in 2003, 2004, and 2005, respectively The top 10 serotypes accounted for 94% of the total Salmonella isolates with S. Derby (45%), S. Typhimurium var. 5- (15%), and S Heidelberg (9%) comprising the top three serotypes each year. Salmonella Give was found in 8% of samples in 2003, 3% of samples m 2004, but was not found in the top 10% of ISolates m 2005. The percentage of Salmonella isolates that were susceptible to all of the 16 antimicrobials tested increased from 6% in 2003 to 15% in 2005. At the same time, the percentage of isolates resistant to 10 or more antimicrobials increased from 1% to 15%. The increase in multiple drug resistance was coincident with an increase in the percentage of S. Derby isolates. Overall, frequency of resistance to individual antimicrobials was relatively stable from 2003 to 2005 and observed differences were related to changes in serotypes over time, which highlights the importance of reporting resistance data by individual serotype. CAHFSE provides a mechanism to monitor changes in serotypes of Salmonella as well as antimicrobial resistance patterns over time

Salmonella serotypes from 1997-2003 NARMS swine diagnostic, on-farm, and slaughter samples

The veterinary component of the National Antimicorbial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) identified 8527 Salmonella isolates from swine samples in the years 1997-2003. Fifty-one Salmonella serotypes were identified from 3147 diagnostic, 2138 on-farm, and 3246 slaughter samples

Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella from 1997-2003 NARMS swine samples

A total of 3246 swine slaughter and 3147 swine diagnostic Salmonella isolates from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) for the years 1997-2003 were tested for antimicrobial resistance. No resistance was detected in any Salmonella isolates for ciprofloxacin or amikacin. For all other antimicrobics tested, more resistance was observed in diagnostic isolates compared to slaughter isolates

Antimicrobial susceptibility of salmonella isolates from swine

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance among bacteria is of growing concern to practitioners and producers. Problems associated with the emergence of resistance include treatment failure, prolonged shedding, and the development oflong term carriage of the resistant bacteria in the host. The emergence of resistance among Salmonella species is particularly worrisome as it is a zoonotic agent and is ubiquitous in nature

Serotypes and Antimicrobial Resistance in Salmonella Isolates from Swine, NARMS-EB 1997-2000

The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) was developed in 1996 as a collaborative effort between the FDA, USDA, and CDC to monitor antimicrobial resistance development in enteric organisms in humans and animals. Salmonella was selected as the sentinel organism

Serosurvey for Influenza D Virus Exposure in Cattle, United States, 2014–2015 - Volume 25, Number 11—November 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Influenza D virus has been detected predominantly in cattle from several countries. In the United States, regional and state seropositive rates for influenza D have previously been reported, but little information exists to evaluate national seroprevalence. We performed a serosurveillance study with 1,992 bovine serum samples collected across the country in 2014 and 2015. We found a high overall seropositive rate of 77.5% nationally; regional rates varied from 47.7% to 84.6%. Samples from the Upper Midwest and Mountain West regions showed the highest seropositive rates. In addition, seropositive samples were found in 41 of the 42 states from which cattle originated, demonstrating that influenza D virus circulated widely in cattle during this period. The distribution of influenza D virus in cattle from the United States highlights the need for greater understanding about pathogenesis, epidemiology, and the implications for animal health

National antimicrobial resistance monitoring system: Results for swine

Use of antimicrobics has increased in both human and veterinary medicine. This is due in part to the availability of the antimicrobics and the efficacy they impart in control of certain infectious diseases. However, use of antimicrobics can lead to the development of resistance to the antirnicrobics. Antimicrobial resistance can diminish effectiveness and may even render an antimicrobic ineffective as a therapeutic. Although use may result in a portion of bacteria that are resistant, the exact fate of this population in terms of persistence and transmission has been difficult to determine. Use panerns in veterinary medicine (therapeutic versus preventive versus growth promotion use) also complicates the picture. Additionally, while transmission of resistant bacteria from animals to humans occurs, it has been difficult to assess the extent to which this occurs and the impact transmission has on actual dissemination of resistant populations

Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: Review of current approaches

BACKGROUND: Emerging animal and zoonotic diseases and increasing international trade have resulted in an increased demand for veterinary surveillance systems. However, human and financial resources available to support government veterinary services are becoming more and more limited in many countries world-wide. Intuitively, issues that present higher risks merit higher priority for surveillance resources as investments will yield higher benefit-cost ratios. The rapid rate of acceptance of this core concept of risk-based surveillance has outpaced the development of its theoretical and practical bases. DISCUSSION: The principal objectives of risk-based veterinary surveillance are to identify surveillance needs to protect the health of livestock and consumers, to set priorities, and to allocate resources effectively and efficiently. An important goal is to achieve a higher benefit-cost ratio with existing or reduced resources. We propose to define risk-based surveillance systems as those that apply risk assessment methods in different steps of traditional surveillance design for early detection and management of diseases or hazards. In risk-based designs, public health, economic and trade consequences of diseases play an important role in selection of diseases or hazards. Furthermore, certain strata of the population of interest have a higher probability to be sampled for detection of diseases or hazards. Evaluation of risk-based surveillance systems shall prove that the efficacy of risk-based systems is equal or higher than traditional systems; however, the efficiency (benefit-cost ratio) shall be higher in risk-based surveillance systems. SUMMARY: Risk-based surveillance considerations are useful to support both strategic and operational decision making. This article highlights applications of risk-based surveillance systems in the veterinary field including food safety. Examples are provided for risk-based hazard selection, risk-based selection of sampling strata as well as sample size calculation based on risk considerations