Existencias de bovinos para carne en la provincia de Córdoba (Actualización 2017)

La disponibilidad de información actualizada sobre las existencias ganaderas en la provincia de Córdoba, así como el conocimiento de la cantidad y distribución de los establecimientos que desarrollan la actividad, constituye una herramienta básica para la planificación, ejecución y monitoreo de acciones institucionales que se diseñan para el mejoramiento del sector. El análisis de la información que se genera periódicamente en las campañas de vacunación antiaftosa sumado al registro informatizado de los movimientos de ingresos y egresos de hacienda de cada establecimiento provincial que maneja el SENASA en todo el territorio provincial, permite disponer de información primaria de altísimo valor para los fines mencionados. El INTA y el SENASA a nivel provincial han acordado poner esta información a disposición de investigadores, extensionistas y técnicos de ambas instituciones, con el objetivo final de mejorar el nivel de intervención en este territorio.Fil: Latimori, Nestor Juan. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Dana, Gastón. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria. Regional Córdoba; Argentin

Extreme drought impacts have been underestimated in grasslands and shrublands globally.

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of short-term (~1 y) drought events-the most common duration of drought-globally. Yet the impact of this intensification of drought on ecosystem functioning remains poorly resolved. This is due in part to the widely disparate approaches ecologists have employed to study drought, variation in the severity and duration of drought studied, and differences among ecosystems in vegetation, edaphic and climatic attributes that can mediate drought impacts. To overcome these problems and better identify the factors that modulate drought responses, we used a coordinated distributed experiment to quantify the impact of short-term drought on grassland and shrubland ecosystems. With a standardized approach, we imposed ~a single year of drought at 100 sites on six continents. Here we show that loss of a foundational ecosystem function-aboveground net primary production (ANPP)-was 60% greater at sites that experienced statistically extreme drought (1-in-100-y event) vs. those sites where drought was nominal (historically more common) in magnitude (35% vs. 21%, respectively). This reduction in a key carbon cycle process with a single year of extreme drought greatly exceeds previously reported losses for grasslands and shrublands. Our global experiment also revealed high variability in drought response but that relative reductions in ANPP were greater in drier ecosystems and those with fewer plant species. Overall, our results demonstrate with unprecedented rigor that the global impacts of projected increases in drought severity have been significantly underestimated and that drier and less diverse sites are likely to be most vulnerable to extreme drought

Proyecto Orlando : performance transdisciplinar

Actividad del Proyecto de Producción CePIAbierto 2019 “Proyecto Orlando” (RHCD 154/2019). Creación, producción y escenificación de una obra músico-teatral para coro e instrumentos musicales basada en la obra literaria "Orlando" (1928) de Virginia Woolf, a través del procedimiento de la Traducción Intersemiótica (Julio Plaza) y de un proceso de creación colectiva. Al igual que el biógrafo de Orlando, intentaremos contar las aventuras de este joven noble inglés nacido en el siglo XVI que vive más de trescientos años. En su paso por la historia, nuestro héroe atraviesa experiencias transformadoras que nos llenarán de muchas preguntas, algunas respuestas y mucha confusión.Performance transdisciplinar basada en la obra literaria "Orlando", de Virginia Woolf.Fil: Terráneo, Emiliano. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Yulitta, Mayra Luz. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Pisano, Santiago. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Orgaz, Agustina Nahir. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Fontanetto, Daniela. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: González, Lucas Ezequiel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Carvallo, Lorenzo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Jaramillo, Lucas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Fagiano, Lucas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Fagiano, Gastón. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Courel, Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Maglione, Maria Emilia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Churquina Diaz, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Barnes Gormaz, Julia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Velasco Curado, Agustina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Díaz, Ana Victoria. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Badini, María Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Bordone Carranza, Florencia Sofía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Boursiac, Ailén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Sdihe Chaij, Camila. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Chazarreta, Rocío Carla. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Chiapero, Ana Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Jaimez Novillo, Zaira. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Jobani, Ailin. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Martínez, Laura Daniela. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Martoglio, Alina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Masino, Chiara. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Montenegro, María Pilar. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Moreira, Sofia Arianne. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Paz Mérida, Ana Lucía. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Robledo, Silvia Eliana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Rojas, Azul Agostina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Sargiotto, Carla. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Tavip, Valentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Varela Rinaldoni, Azul Dana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Yulitta, Ayelen. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Jobani, Ailín. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Bordenabe, Carolina Ruth. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Ressio, Tadeo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Sánchez, Pablo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Artes; Argentina.Fil: Bonanno, Sascha. Universidad Provincial de Córdoba. Facultad de Arte y Diseño. Escuela Superior Integral de Teatro Roberto Arlt; Argentina

Extreme drought impacts have been underestimated in grasslands and shrublands globally

Altres Ajuts: Fundación Ramón Areces grant CIVP20A6621Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of short-term (~1 y) drought events-the most common duration of drought-globally. Yet the impact of this intensification of drought on ecosystem functioning remains poorly resolved. This is due in part to the widely disparate approaches ecologists have employed to study drought, variation in the severity and duration of drought studied, and differences among ecosystems in vegetation, edaphic and climatic attributes that can mediate drought impacts. To overcome these problems and better identify the factors that modulate drought responses, we used a coordinated distributed experiment to quantify the impact of short-term drought on grassland and shrubland ecosystems. With a standardized approach, we imposed ~a single year of drought at 100 sites on six continents. Here we show that loss of a foundational ecosystem function-aboveground net primary production (ANPP)-was 60% greater at sites that experienced statistically extreme drought (1-in-100-y event) vs. those sites where drought was nominal (historically more common) in magnitude (35% vs. 21%, respectively). This reduction in a key carbon cycle process with a single year of extreme drought greatly exceeds previously reported losses for grasslands and shrublands. Our global experiment also revealed high variability in drought response but that relative reductions in ANPP were greater in drier ecosystems and those with fewer plant species. Overall, our results demonstrate with unprecedented rigor that the global impacts of projected increases in drought severity have been significantly underestimated and that drier and less diverse sites are likely to be most vulnerable to extreme drought

Extreme drought impacts have been underestimated in grasslands and shrublands globally

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of short-term (~1 y) drought events—the most common duration of drought—globally. Yet the impact of this intensification of drought on ecosystem functioning remains poorly resolved. This is due in part to the widely disparate approaches ecologists have employed to study drought, variation in the severity and duration of drought studied, and differences among ecosystems in vegetation, edaphic and climatic attributes that can mediate drought impacts. To overcome these problems and better identify the factors that modulate drought responses, we used a coordinated distributed experiment to quantify the impact of short-term drought on grassland and shrubland ecosystems. With a standardized approach, we imposed ~a single year of drought at 100 sites on six continents. Here we show that loss of a foundational ecosystem function—aboveground net primary production (ANPP)—was 60% greater at sites that experienced statistically extreme drought (1-in-100-y event) vs. those sites where drought was nominal (historically more common) in magnitude (35% vs. 21%, respectively). This reduction in a key carbon cycle process with a single year of extreme drought greatly exceeds previously reported losses for grasslands and shrublands. Our global experiment also revealed high variability in drought response but that relative reductions in ANPP were greater in drier ecosystems and those with fewer plant species. Overall, our results demonstrate with unprecedented rigor that the global impacts of projected increases in drought severity have been significantly underestimated and that drier and less diverse sites are likely to be most vulnerable to extreme drought

Evolution over Time of Ventilatory Management and Outcome of Patients with Neurologic Disease∗

OBJECTIVES: To describe the changes in ventilator management over time in patients with neurologic disease at ICU admission and to estimate factors associated with 28-day hospital mortality. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of three prospective, observational, multicenter studies. SETTING: Cohort studies conducted in 2004, 2010, and 2016. PATIENTS: Adult patients who received mechanical ventilation for more than 12 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 20,929 patients enrolled, we included 4,152 (20%) mechanically ventilated patients due to different neurologic diseases. Hemorrhagic stroke and brain trauma were the most common pathologies associated with the need for mechanical ventilation. Although volume-cycled ventilation remained the preferred ventilation mode, there was a significant (p < 0.001) increment in the use of pressure support ventilation. The proportion of patients receiving a protective lung ventilation strategy was increased over time: 47% in 2004, 63% in 2010, and 65% in 2016 (p < 0.001), as well as the duration of protective ventilation strategies: 406 days per 1,000 mechanical ventilation days in 2004, 523 days per 1,000 mechanical ventilation days in 2010, and 585 days per 1,000 mechanical ventilation days in 2016 (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the length of stay in the ICU, mortality in the ICU, and mortality in hospital from 2004 to 2016. Independent risk factors for 28-day mortality were age greater than 75 years, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II greater than 50, the occurrence of organ dysfunction within first 48 hours after brain injury, and specific neurologic diseases such as hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and brain trauma. CONCLUSIONS: More lung-protective ventilatory strategies have been implemented over years in neurologic patients with no effect on pulmonary complications or on survival. We found several prognostic factors on mortality such as advanced age, the severity of the disease, organ dysfunctions, and the etiology of neurologic disease