38 research outputs found

    Concordance between vocal and genetic diversity in crested gibbons

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gibbons or small apes are, next to great apes, our closest living relatives, and form the most diverse group of contemporary hominoids. A characteristic trait of gibbons is their species-specific song structure, which, however, exhibits a certain amount of inter- and intra-individual variation. Although differences in gibbon song structure are routinely applied as taxonomic tool to identify subspecies and species, it remains unclear to which degree acoustic and phylogenetic differences are correlated. To trace this issue, we comparatively analyse song recordings and mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequence data from 22 gibbon populations representing six of the seven crested gibbon species (genus <it>Nomascus</it>). In addition, we address whether song similarity and geographic distribution can support a recent hypothesis about the biogeographic history of crested gibbons.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The acoustic analysis of 92 gibbon duets confirms the hypothesised concordance between song structure and phylogeny. Based on features of male and female songs, we can not only distinguish between <it>N. nasutus</it>, <it>N. concolor </it>and the four southern species (<it>N. leucogenys, N. siki, N. annamensis</it>, <it>N. gabriellae</it>), but also between the latter by applying more detailed analysis. In addition to the significant correlation between song structure and genetic similarity, we find a similar high correlation between song similarity and geographic distance.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results show that the structure of crested gibbon songs is not only a reliable tool to verify phylogenetic relatedness, but also to unravel geographic origins. As vocal production in other nonhuman primate species appears to be evolutionarily based, it is likely that loud calls produced by other species can serve as characters to elucidate phylogenetic relationships.</p

    Integrative Biomimetics of Autonomous Hexapedal Locomotion

    Get PDF
    Dürr V, Arena PP, Cruse H, et al. Integrative Biomimetics of Autonomous Hexapedal Locomotion. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 2019;13: 88.Despite substantial advances in many different fields of neurorobotics in general, and biomimetic robots in particular, a key challenge is the integration of concepts: to collate and combine research on disparate and conceptually disjunct research areas in the neurosciences and engineering sciences. We claim that the development of suitable robotic integration platforms is of particular relevance to make such integration of concepts work in practice. Here, we provide an example for a hexapod robotic integration platform for autonomous locomotion. In a sequence of six focus sections dealing with aspects of intelligent, embodied motor control in insects and multipedal robots—ranging from compliant actuation, distributed proprioception and control of multiple legs, the formation of internal representations to the use of an internal body model—we introduce the walking robot HECTOR as a research platform for integrative biomimetics of hexapedal locomotion. Owing to its 18 highly sensorized, compliant actuators, light-weight exoskeleton, distributed and expandable hardware architecture, and an appropriate dynamic simulation framework, HECTOR offers many opportunities to integrate research effort across biomimetics research on actuation, sensory-motor feedback, inter-leg coordination, and cognitive abilities such as motion planning and learning of its own body size

    A biomechanics approach to sensorimotor control of insect walking

    No full text
    Dallmann C. A biomechanics approach to sensorimotor control of insect walking. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld; 2018

    Joint moments in the limbs of a freely walking insect: multifunctional and flexible contributions to propulsion and support

    No full text
    Dallmann C, Schmitz J. Joint moments in the limbs of a freely walking insect: multifunctional and flexible contributions to propulsion and support. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2015;55:E40-E40

    Joint moments in the limbs of an insect walking freely on stable and unstable ground

    No full text
    Dallmann C, Schmitz J. Joint moments in the limbs of an insect walking freely on stable and unstable ground. Presented at the Göttingen Meeting of the German Neuroscience Society 2015, Göttingen

    Force and torque profiles of stick insects walking on compliant surfaces

    No full text
    Schmitz J, Dallmann C. Force and torque profiles of stick insects walking on compliant surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting Society for Neuroscience. 2014

    When Time is Scarce, Timing is Almost Everything: a Comparative Analysis of Fast vs. Slow Insect Locomotor Control

    No full text
    Neveln I, Dallmann C, Sponberg S. When Time is Scarce, Timing is Almost Everything: a Comparative Analysis of Fast vs. Slow Insect Locomotor Control. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY. 2019;59(Suppl. 1):E167

    Motor control of an insect leg during level and incline walking.

    No full text
    Dallmann C, Dürr V, Schmitz J. Motor control of an insect leg during level and incline walking. The Journal of experimental biology. 2019;222(Pt 7): jeb188748.During walking, the leg motor system must continually adjust to changes in mechanical conditions, such as the inclination of the ground. To understand the underlying control, it is important to know how changes in leg muscle activity relate to leg kinematics (movements) and leg dynamics (forces, torques). Here, we studied these parameters in hindlegs of stick insects (Carausius morosus) during level and uphill/downhill (±45deg) walking, using a combination of electromyography, 3D motion capture and ground reaction force measurements. We find that some kinematic parameters including leg joint angles and body height vary across walking conditions. However, kinematics vary little compared with dynamics: horizontal leg forces and torques at the thorax-coxa joint (leg protraction/retraction) and femur-tibia joint (leg flexion/extension) tend to be stronger during uphill walking and are reversed in sign during downhill walking. At the thorax-coxa joint, the different mechanical demands are met by adjustments in the timing and magnitude of antagonistic muscle activity. Adjustments occur primarily in the first half of stance after the touch-down of the leg. When insects transition from level to incline walking, the characteristic adjustments in muscle activity occur with the first step of the leg on the incline, but not in anticipation. Together, these findings indicate that stick insects adjust leg muscle activity on a step-by-step basis so as to maintain a similar kinematic pattern under different mechanical demands. The underlying control might rely primarily on feedback from leg proprioceptors signaling leg position and movement. © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

    Data from: Joint torques in a freely walking insect reveal distinct functions of leg joints in propulsion and posture control

    No full text
    Determining the mechanical output of limb joints is critical for understanding the control of complex motor behaviours such as walking. In the case of insect walking, the neural infrastructure for single-joint control is well described. However, a detailed description of the motor output in form of time-varying joint torques is lacking. Here, we determine joint torques in the stick insect to identify leg joint function in the control of body height and propulsion. Torques were determined by measuring whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces in freely walking animals. We demonstrate that despite strong differences in morphology and posture, stick insects show a functional division of joints similar to other insect model systems. Propulsion was generated by strong depression torques about the coxa-trochanter joint, not by retraction or flexion/extension torques. Torques about the respective thorax-coxa and femur-tibia joints were often directed opposite to fore-aft forces and joint movements. This suggests a posture-dependent mechanism that counteracts collapse of the leg under body load and directs the resultant force vector such that strong depression torques can control both body height and propulsion. Our findings parallel propulsive mechanisms described in other walking, jumping, and flying insects and challenge current control models of insect walking

    Joint torques in a freely walking insect reveal distinct functions of leg joints in propulsion and posture control

    No full text
    Dallmann C, Dürr V, Schmitz J. Joint torques in a freely walking insect reveal distinct functions of leg joints in propulsion and posture control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;283(1823): 20151708.Determining the mechanical output of limb joints is critical for understanding the control of complex motor behaviours such as walking. In the case of insect walking, the neural infrastructure for single-joint control is well described. However, a detailed description of the motor output in form of time-varying joint torques is lacking. Here, we determine joint torquesin the stick insect to identify leg joint function in the control of body height and propulsion. Torques were determined by measuring whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces in freely walking animals. We demonstrate that despite strong differences in morphology and posture, stick insects show a functional division of joints similar to other insect model systems. Propulsion was generated by strong depression torques about the coxa–trochanter joint, not by retraction or flexion/extension torques. Torques about the respective thorax–coxa and femur–tibia joints were often directed opposite to fore–aft forces and joint movements. This suggests a posture-dependent mechanism that counteracts collapse of the leg under body load and directs the resultant force vector such that strong depression torques can control both body height and propulsion. Our findings parallel propulsive mechanisms described in other walking, jumping and flying insects, and challenge current control models of insect walking
    corecore