20 research outputs found

    Gender differences among smokers and quitters in the Working Well Trial

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Gender differences in smoking and smoking cessation among participants in the Working Well Trial are characterized. METHODS: A prospective randomized matched-pair evaluation was conducted among 90 predominantly blue-collar worksites. Cross-sectional surveys of employees\u27 tobacco use behaviors were conducted at baseline and after a 2.5-year smoking cessation intervention. Respondents included 5,523 females and 12,313 males at baseline and 4,663 females and 10,919 males at follow-up. The main outcome measures included self-reported continuous smoking abstinence rates for 7 days and for 6 months. RESULTS: Smoking prevalence was significantly higher for women than for men at baseline, but not at follow-up. Variables believed to influence smoking cessation were compared at baseline. Significant gender differences were found for number of cigarettes smoked/day, number of previous quit attempts, job strain, stage of change, and behavioral processes of change. At follow-up, no gender differences in quit rates were observed; however, women in the intervention condition were more likely to quit than women in the control condition, whereas no differences were seen among men by treatment condition. CONCLUSIONS: Gender is not a strong predictor of smoking cessation in this population; however, women were more likely to quit with an intervention than without one

    Environmental Assessment at Worksites After a Multilevel Intervention to Promote Activity and Changes in Eating: The PACE Project

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in the worksite environment in response to a multilevel intervention over a two year period. METHODS: Worksites were recruited in the greater Seattle area, and 34 were randomized to intervention or comparison condition. The intervention was based on the ecological model, with a framework of defined phases of intervention that included worksite wide events implemented in partnership with employee-based advisory boards. The assessment of the worksite environment used a modification of the CHEW. Subscales were developed using baseline data only. The intervention effect on different aspects of the worksite environment was estimated using logistic regression with robust estimating procedures. RESULTS: Only changes in the physical activity and nutrition information environments were significantly associated with the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides one of the first attempts at using environmental assessment in the evaluation of worksite interventions
    corecore