The influence of semantic top-down processing in auditory verbal hallucinations

AbstractBackgroundAuditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are one of the most prominent symptoms of schizophrenia but have also been reported in the general population. Several cognitive models have tried to elucidate the mechanism behind auditory verbal hallucinations, among which a top-down model. According to this model, perception is biased towards top-down information (e.g., expectations), reducing the influence of bottom-up information coming from the sense organs. This bias predisposes to false perceptions, i.e., hallucinations.MethodsThe current study investigated this hypothesis in non-psychotic individuals with frequent AVH, psychotic patients with AVH and healthy control subjects by applying a semantic top-down task. In this task, top-down processes are manipulated through the semantic context of a sentence. In addition, the association between hallucination proneness and semantic top-down errors was investigated.ResultsNon-psychotic individuals with AVH made significantly more top-down errors compared to healthy controls, while overall accuracy was similar. The number of top-down errors, corrected for overall accuracy, in the patient group was in between those of the other two groups and did not differ significantly from either the non-psychotic individuals with AVH or the healthy controls. The severity of hallucination proneness correlated with the number of top-down errors.DiscussionThese findings confirm that non-psychotic individuals with AVH are stronger influenced by top-down processing (i.e., perceptual expectations) than healthy controls. In contrast, our data suggest that in psychotic patients semantic expectations do not play a role in the etiology of AVH. This finding may point towards different cognitive mechanisms for pathological and nonpathological hallucinations

Celio (\u2705), Orkand (\u2707) Named Up and Coming Leaders

BackgroundAlthough auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are a core symptom of schizophrenia, they also occur in non-psychotic individuals, in the absence of other psychotic, affective, cognitive and negative symptoms. AVH have been hypothesized to result from deviant integration of inferior frontal, parahippocampal and superior temporal brain areas. However, a direct link between dysfunctional connectivity and AVH has not yet been established. To determine whether hallucinations are indeed related to aberrant connectivity, AVH should be studied in isolation, for example in non-psychotic individuals with AVH.MethodResting-state connectivity was investigated in 25 non-psychotic subjects with AVH and 25 matched control subjects using seed regression analysis with the (1) left and (2) right inferior frontal, (3) left and (4) right superior temporal and (5) left parahippocampal areas as the seed regions. To correct for cardiorespiratory (CR) pulsatility rhythms in the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, heartbeat and respiration were monitored during scanning and the fMRI data were corrected for these rhythms using the image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects RETROICOR.ResultsIn comparison with the control group, non-psychotic individuals with AVH showed increased connectivity between the left and the right superior temporal regions and also between the left parahippocampal region and the left inferior frontal gyrus. Moreover, this group did not show a negative correlation between the left superior temporal region and the right inferior frontal region, as was observed in the healthy control group.ConclusionsAberrant connectivity of frontal, parahippocampal and superior temporal brain areas can be specifically related to the predisposition to hallucinate in the auditory domain.</jats:sec

Oscillatory Cortical Network Involved in Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH), a prominent symptom of schizophrenia, are often highly distressing for patients. Better understanding of the pathogenesis of hallucinations could increase therapeutic options. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides direct measures of neuronal activity and has an excellent temporal resolution, offering a unique opportunity to study AVH pathophysiology.Twelve patients (10 paranoid schizophrenia, 2 psychosis not otherwise specified) indicated the presence of AVH by button-press while lying in a MEG scanner. As a control condition, patients performed a self-paced button-press task. AVH-state and non-AVH state were contrasted in a region-of-interest (ROI) approach. In addition, the two seconds before AVH onset were contrasted with the two seconds after AVH onset to elucidate a possible triggering mechanism.AVH correlated with a decrease in beta-band power in the left temporal cortex. A decrease in alpha-band power was observed in the right inferior frontal gyrus. AVH onset was related to a decrease in theta-band power in the right hippocampus.These results suggest that AVH are triggered by a short aberration in the theta band in a memory-related structure, followed by activity in language areas accompanying the experience of AVH itself

White noise speech illusion and psychosis expression:An experimental investigation of psychosis liability

Background: An association between white noise speech illusion and psychotic symptoms has been reported in patients and their relatives. This supports the theory that bottom-up and top-down perceptual processes are involved in the mechanisms underlying perceptual abnormalities. However, findings in nonclinical populations have been conflicting. Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the association between white noise speech illusion and subclinical expression of psychotic symptoms in a nonclinical sample. Findings were compared to previous results to investigate potential methodology dependent differences. Methods: In a general population adolescent and young adult twin sample (n = 704), the association between white noise speech illusion and subclinical psychotic experiences, using the Structured Interview for Schizotypy-Revised (SIS-R) and the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE), was analyzed using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Results: Perception of any white noise speech illusion was not associated with either positive or negative schizotypy in the general population twin sample, using the method by Galdos et al. (2011) (positive: ORadjusted: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.6-1.12, p = 0.217; negative: ORadjusted: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.56-1.02, p = 0.065) and the method by Catalan et al. (2014) (positive: ORadjusted: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.79-1.57, p = 0.557). No association was found between CAPE scores and speech illusion (ORadjusted: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.88-1.79, p = 0.220). For the Catalan et al. (2014) but not the Galdos et al. (2011) method, a negative association was apparent between positive schizotypy and speech illusion with positive or negative affective valence (ORadjusted: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.81, p = 0.008). Conclusion: Contrary to findings in clinical populations, white noise speech illusion may not be associated with psychosis proneness in nonclinical populations

Auditory Verbal Hallucinations, phenomenology and neurocognitive mechanisms

Background Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) can be a symptom in several psychiatric and neurological disorders, but are also prevalent in the general population. These non-psychotic individuals are not disturbed by their sub-clinical symptoms and function well both socially and occupationally. The question remains whether AVH in patients with a psychotic disorder are comparable to those in non-psychotic individuals. With this aim, the studies presented in the first part of this thesis investigated the phenomenology of AVH. The second part focussed on neurocognitive mechanisms that are related to AVH in these groups. Methods The non-psychotic individuals and the voices they hear were described with the help of several questionnaires in the first two studies. With respect to neurocognitive mechanisms in the second part of this thesis, the third study explored the relationship of AVH in non-psychotic individuals with cognitive functioning using several cognitive tests. Finally, healthy controls, non-psychotic individuals with AVH and psychotic patients with AVH were compared on the presence of cognitive biases in the fifth study, on semantic top-down processing in the sixth study and on the presence of reported childhood trauma in the last study. Results These studies showed phenomenological differences between AVH in non-psychotic individuals and psychotic patients with respect to age at onset, emotional valence, frequency and control, while some characteristics were similar. Furthermore, AVH were found to be related to poorer but not impaired inhibition and working memory within the verbal domain, increased semantic top-down functioning and the absence of most cognitive biases in non-psychotic individuals with AVH. In psychotic patients with AVH however, no relation with semantic top-down processing was found and several cognitive biases were present. Finally, both AVH groups experienced significantly more childhood trauma than healthy controls. Conclusion The differences in cognitive processes that were found in these studies suggest that underlying mechanisms of AVH in non-psychotic individuals and psychotic patients are not completely similar and in fact differ on rather fundamental aspects. This can be explained by making a distinction between biological and cognitive factors in the generation in AVH. The biological basis for AVH (genetic predisposition and factors influencing brain development, for example childhood trauma) is dominant in psychotic patients and thereby limiting their functioning in many ways. As such, little room may be left for (intact) cognitive processes to play a part in the generation of AVH. In the non-psychotic individuals, this biological influence is weaker. Their psychotic symptoms are less severe and their cognitive alterations are not of clinical significance. This gives these intact cognitive processes, such as semantic top-down processing, more opportunity to exert their influence and thereby possibly shaping the phenomenology or experience of AVH. Furthermore, relative intact cognitive functioning instead of cognitive impairment may even have served as a protective factor in the non-psychotic individuals, and prevented them to progress further along the continuum to the help-seeking minority with the clinical phenotype

Cognitive biases and auditory verbal hallucinations in healthy and clinical individuals

Background. Several cognitive biases are related to psychotic symptoms, including auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH). It remains unclear whether these biases differ in voice-hearers with and without a 'need-for-care'. Method. A total of 72 healthy controls, 72 healthy voice-hearers and 72 clinical voice-hearers were compared on the Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis (CBQp), which assesses 'intentionalizing', ' jumping to conclusions', 'catastrophizing', 'dichotomous thinking' and 'emotional reasoning' in vignettes characterized by two themes, 'threatening events' and ` anomalous perceptions'. Results. Healthy voice-hearers scored intermediately on total CBQp between the control and clinical groups, differing significantly from both. However, on four out of five biases the scores of the healthy voice-hearers were comparable with those of the healthy controls. The only exception was 'emotional reasoning', on which their scores were comparable with the clinical group. Healthy voice-hearers demonstrated fewer biases than the psychotic patients on the ` threatening events', but not the 'anomalous perceptions', vignettes. CBQp scores were related to both cognitive and emotional, but not physical, characteristics of voices. Conclusions. Most cognitive biases prevalent in clinical voice-hearers, particularly with threatening events themes, are absent in healthy voice-hearers, apart from emotional reasoning which may be specifically related to the vulnerability to develop AVH. The association between biases and both beliefs about voices and distress/ emotional valence is consistent with the close links between emotions and psychotic phenomena identified by cognitive models of psychosis. The absence of reasoning biases might prevent the formation of threatening appraisals about anomalous experiences, thereby reducing the likelihood of distress and 'need for care