52 research outputs found
Upper airway dynamics during negative expiratory pressure in apneic and non-apneic awake snorers
BACKGROUND: The ability of negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique to differentiate between awake snorers with and without obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH) was investigated. METHODS: Forty-eight subjects with sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and 7 healthy subjects, as non-snorer controls, underwent the NEP application of -5 and -7 cmH(2)O in the seated and supine position during wakefulness, after performing a sleep study. The upper airway collapsibility was assessed by computing the volume exhaled during the first 0.5 sec. (V,NEP(0.5)) and 1 sec. (V,NEP(1)) following the NEP start. RESULTS: Patients with severe (AHI ≥ 30) (n = 19) and mild-to-moderate (AHI <30 and >5) (n = 15) OSAH had lower V,NEP(0.5 )(340 ± 88 ml) as compared to snorers (AHI ≤ 5) (n = 14) (427 ± 101 ml; p < 0.01) and controls (n = 7) (492 ± 69 ml; p < 0.001) in the supine position with NEP -5 cmH(2)O. Less significant differences among the different groups were observed for V,NEP(0.5 )in the seated position with NEP -5 cmH(2)O and in both positions with NEP -7 cmH(2)O (only OSAH patients vs controls, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for V,NEP(1 )in either position by using both NEP -5 cmH(2)O and -7 cmH(2)O. In spite of this, a substantial overlapping of V,NEP(0.5 )and V,NEP(1 )between snorers and OSAH patients did not allow to identify a reliable diagnostic cut-off level. An inverse correlation with AHI was found for V,NEP(0.5 )in the supine position with NEP -5 cmH(2)O (r(s )= -0.46, p < 0.05) in severe OSAH patients. CONCLUSION: The awake OSAH patients exhibit values of V,NEP(0.5 )and V,NEP(1 )lesser than those of awake snorers. The NEP technique, however, appears to have a limited usefulness as clinical tool for routine screening of the OSAH patients during wakefulness
Automated detection of sleep disordered breathing using a nasal pressure monitoring device
Diurnal and Nocturnal Diuresis and Natriuresis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Effects of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy
High Mallampati score and nasal obstruction are associated risk factors for obstructive sleep apnoea
Induced nasal obstruction can cause obstructive apnoeas in healthy subjects during sleep, but the relationship between nasal resistance measured during wakefulness and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is weak. It was postulated that if the subjects could not breathe through the nose, the oral airway must be used, but if this airway is narrowed as well, then it could precipitate sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). Nasal patency, Mallampati score (MS), neck circumference and body mass index were measured in 202 subjects referred to the authors' hospital to undergo a full-night polysomnography for suspicion of SDB. A significant correlation was found between the MS and apnoea/hypopnoea index measured during sleep. However, the relationship between these parameters was only significant in patients with nasal obstruction. The relative risk of having OSAS with a MS of III or IV was 1.95 for the whole group and 2.45 in patients with nasal obstruction. In conclusion, a high Mallampati score represents a predisposing factor for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, especially if it is associated with nasal obstruction. These patients merit special attention from both the sleep physician and the anaesthetist.status: publishe
Obligate Nasal Breathing in an Elderly Woman: Increased Risk of Nasogastric Tube Feeding
- …