20 research outputs found

    Man and the Last Great Wilderness: Human Impact on the Deep Sea

    Get PDF
    The deep sea, the largest ecosystem on Earth and one of the least studied, harbours high biodiversity and provides a wealth of resources. Although humans have used the oceans for millennia, technological developments now allow exploitation of fisheries resources, hydrocarbons and minerals below 2000 m depth. The remoteness of the deep seafloor has promoted the disposal of residues and litter. Ocean acidification and climate change now bring a new dimension of global effects. Thus the challenges facing the deep sea are large and accelerating, providing a new imperative for the science community, industry and national and international organizations to work together to develop successful exploitation management and conservation of the deep-sea ecosystem. This paper provides scientific expert judgement and a semi-quantitative analysis of past, present and future impacts of human-related activities on global deep-sea habitats within three categories: disposal, exploitation and climate change. The analysis is the result of a Census of Marine Life – SYNDEEP workshop (September 2008). A detailed review of known impacts and their effects is provided. The analysis shows how, in recent decades, the most significant anthropogenic activities that affect the deep sea have evolved from mainly disposal (past) to exploitation (present). We predict that from now and into the future, increases in atmospheric CO2 and facets and consequences of climate change will have the most impact on deep-sea habitats and their fauna. Synergies between different anthropogenic pressures and associated effects are discussed, indicating that most synergies are related to increased atmospheric CO2 and climate change effects. We identify deep-sea ecosystems we believe are at higher risk from human impacts in the near future: benthic communities on sedimentary upper slopes, cold-water corals, canyon benthic communities and seamount pelagic and benthic communities. We finalise this review with a short discussion on protection and management methods

    Effects of physostigmine and scopolamine on rats' performances in object-recognition and radial-maze tests

    No full text
    The effects of physostigmine and scopolamine were evaluated on working memory of rats in object recognition and radial-maze tests. Three doses of physostigmine hemi-sulfate (Phys: 0.05, 0.10 and 0.20 mg/kg), five doses of scopolamine hydrobromide (Scop: 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg), and one dose of scopolamine methylbromide (Mscop: 2.0 mg/kg) were used. In object recognition test, rats were submitted to three or four intertrial delay conditions (1-min, 15-min and either 60-min or 24-h). The higher doses of Scop (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) in 1-min and 15-min delay and of Phys (0.20 mg/kg) in 1-min delay impaired discrimination between new and familiar objects. Mscop impaired discrimination between objects in 60-min but not in 1-min and 15-min delay. This effect may be state dependent. Radial-maze learning was impaired by the lower doses of scopolamine (0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg) which had no effect in object recognition test. These results show that in our conditions, object recognition is less sensitive than radial-maze test to cholinergic drugs
    corecore