Exercise-induced respiratory muscle work: Effects on blood flow, fatigue and performance

This is the post print version of this article. The official published version can be obtained from the link below.In healthy subjects, heavy intensity endurance exercise places substantial demands on the respiratory muscles as breathing frequency, ventilation and the work of breathing rise over time. In the highly trained subject working at high absolute work rates, the ventilatory demand often causes varying degrees of expiratory flow limitation, sometimes accompanied by lung hyperinflation and, therefore, increased elastic work of breathing. Time-dependant increases in effort perceptions for both dyspnea and limb discomfort accompany these increased ventilatory demands. Similar responses to endurance exercise but at much lower exercise intensities also occur in patients with COPD and CHF. Note that these responses significantly influence exercise performance times in both health and disease. This effect was demonstrated by the marked reductions in the rate of rise of effort perceptions and the enhanced exercise performance times elicited by unloading the respiratory muscles using pressure support ventilation or proportional assist mechanical ventilation. In healthy fit subjects, unloading the inspiratory work of breathing by about one half increased performance by an average of 14% (Harms et al. 2000), and in CHF and COPD patients performance time more than doubled with respiratory muscle unloading (O’Donnell et al. 2001). Why are effort perceptions of limb discomfort markedly reduced and exercise performance increased when the respiratory muscles are unloaded? Our hypothesis is shown in Fig. 1

Recomendações sobre o uso dos testes de exercício na prática clínica

Resumo: A elaboração deste documento pelo grupo de trabalho da European Respiratory Society tem como objectivo apresentar as recomendações sobre o uso clínico dos testes de exercício em doentes com patologia cardiorrespiratória, dando particular ênfase à avaliação funcional, à avaliação do prognóstico e à avaliação das intervenções terapêuticas.A intolerância ao esforço físico é um dos sintomas mais frequentes, condicionando a perda de qualidade de vida do doente com patologia cardiorrespiratória crónica. Pode definir-se âintolerância ao exercícioâ numa perspectiva clínica à incapacidade que o doente apresenta para realizar tarefas que os indivíduos saudáveis considerariam toleráveis.A intolerância ao exercício, considerada em termos do pico de consumo de oxigénio atingido no esforço máximo (VâO2pico) não pode ser prevista por parâmetros avaliados em repouso, como o volume expiratório máximo no primeiro segundo (FEV1), a transferência alvéolo-capilar do monóxido de carbono (DLCO), a fracção de ejecção do ventrículo esquerdo ou o índice de massa corporal (IMC). A avaliação em exercício impõe alguns desafios técnicos: a aplicação de protocolos específicos de incremento de carga de forma precisa e reprodutível, com o recurso habitual a ergómetros, tais como a bicicleta ergométrica e o tapete rolante.A prova de exercício cardiorrespiratória (CPET) é considerada o gold standard na avaliação das causas de intolerância ao exercício em doentes com doença cardíaca e pulmonar e é baseado no princípio de que a falência do sistema ocorre tipicamente quando o sistema (seja ele músculo-energético, cardiovascular ou pulmonar) se encontra sob stress. A CPET compreende a imposição de um exercício com cargas crescentes (ou seja, incremental) limitado por sintomas, enquanto se monitorizam as variáveis cardiopulmonares (exemplo: consumo de oxigénio (VâO2), produção de dióxido de carbono (VâCO2), ventilação minuto (VâE), frequência cardíaca (fC)), a percepção de sintomas (exemplo: a dispneia e o desconforto nos membros inferiores) e, quando necessárias, as avaliações da dessaturação arterial do oxigénio relacionada com o esforço, da hiperinsuflação dinâmica e da força muscular dos membros. Os sistemas são forçados até ao seu limite tolerável, de forma controlada, o que permite detectar respostas que identificam padrões de alteração e que podem ser relacionadas com padrões de referência previamente estudados e publicados pelas sociedades respiratórias europeia e americanas1-3.Neste documento, é descrito o papel da CPET como auxiliar no diagnóstico e na avaliação funcional e prognóstica. A CPET pode: â Fornecer uma medição objectiva da capacidade para o exercício; â Identificar os mecanismos que limitam a tolerância ao exercício; â Estabelecer índices de prognóstico; â Monitorizar a progressão da doença e a resposta às intervenções terapêuticas. â Auxiliar no diagnóstico, em situações de broncoconstrição induzida pelo exercício e de dessaturação arterial do oxigénio. Na identificação das causas de intolerância ao exercício, a CPET pode detectar: â Alterações na entrega de oxigénio (desde a sua entrada nas vias aéreas, passando pelo sistema de transporte cardiocirculatório, até à entrega às mitocôndrias das fibras musculares); â Limitação ventilatória no exercício; â Alteração do controlo ventilatório; â Alteração das trocas gasosas pulmonares; â Percepção excessiva de sintomas (exemplos: dispneia, precordialgia, fadiga muscular periférica); â Disfunção metabólica muscular; â Descondicionamento; â Fraco esforço dispendido. Com um bom esforço realizado, se o valor do pico do consumo de oxigénio atingido foi normal e o motivo para parar a prova foi dispneia ou fadiga muscular, então pode considerar-se que o indivíduo estudado tem uma normal tolerância ao exercício. Este cenário irá excluir doença pulmonar (DPOC, doença intersticial pulmonar, doença vascular pulmonar) ou cardíaca (insuficiência cardíaca congestiva) significativas como causa de intolerância.A prova de exercício cardiopulmonar pode auxiliar no diagnóstico diferencial entre limitação no esforço de origem pulmonar ou cardiocirculatória. Pode fornecer um perfil de respostas que caracterizam determinadas doenças; exemplo: na DPOC são frequentes a limitação ventilatória, a hiperinsuflação dinâmica, a dessaturação arterial com o exercício, a dispneia, a disfunção dos músculos periféricos; na doença intersticial pulmonar são frequentes a dispneia, a restrição ventilatória mecânica e as alterações graves das trocas gasosas. Outros padrões de respostas podem ser encontrados na broncoconstrição induzida pelo exercício, na doença vascular pulmonar, na insuficiência cardíaca e em cardiopatias congénitas. A avaliação cardiorrespiratória no exercício fornece ainda indicadores prognósticos em várias doenças. Descrevem-se neste documento vários trabalhos que estudaram os parâmetros indicadores de prognóstico em doenças como a DPOC, a doença intersticial pulmonar, a hipertensão pulmonar primária, a fibrose quística e a insuficiência cardíaca.Este documento demonstra ainda a utilidade dos testes de exercício na definição das respostas às intervenções terapêuticas, em avaliações seriadas.O grupo de trabalho envolvido neste documento considerou importante apresentar as indicações baseadas na evidência para a realização dos testes de exercício na prática clínica. A evidência actual é clara quanto à utilidade da prova de exercício cardiopulmonar, das provas de marcha e das provas de carga constante na avaliação do grau de intolerância ao exercício, do prognóstico e dos efeitos das intervenções terapêuticas em doentes adultos com doença pulmonar crónica (DPOC, doença intersticial pulmonar, hipertensão pulmonar primária), em crianças e adultos com fibrose quística, em crianças e adultos com broncospasmo induzido pelo exercício, em adultos com insuficiência cardíaca congestiva e em crianças e adolescentes com cardiopatias congénitas.Na elaboração deste documento, os autores pretenderam fornecer as respostas às perguntas que se colocam com frequência na prática clínica: â Quando se deve pedir uma avaliação da intolerância ao esforço? â Qual o teste mais adequado? â Quais as variáveis a seleccionar na avaliação do prognóstico de determinada doença ou na avaliação do efeito de uma intervenção terapêutica particular? O documento contém ainda um suplemento que pode ser obtido on-line e que descreve as bases fisiológicas subjacentes aos parâmetros avaliados nas provas de exercício cardiopulmonar

Size Doesn't Matter: Towards a More Inclusive Philosophy of Biology

notes: As the primary author, O’Malley drafted the paper, and gathered and analysed data (scientific papers and talks). Conceptual analysis was conducted by both authors.publication-status: Publishedtypes: ArticlePhilosophers of biology, along with everyone else, generally perceive life to fall into two broad categories, the microbes and macrobes, and then pay most of their attention to the latter. ‘Macrobe’ is the word we propose for larger life forms, and we use it as part of an argument for microbial equality. We suggest that taking more notice of microbes – the dominant life form on the planet, both now and throughout evolutionary history – will transform some of the philosophy of biology’s standard ideas on ontology, evolution, taxonomy and biodiversity. We set out a number of recent developments in microbiology – including biofilm formation, chemotaxis, quorum sensing and gene transfer – that highlight microbial capacities for cooperation and communication and break down conventional thinking that microbes are solely or primarily single-celled organisms. These insights also bring new perspectives to the levels of selection debate, as well as to discussions of the evolution and nature of multicellularity, and to neo-Darwinian understandings of evolutionary mechanisms. We show how these revisions lead to further complications for microbial classification and the philosophies of systematics and biodiversity. Incorporating microbial insights into the philosophy of biology will challenge many of its assumptions, but also give greater scope and depth to its investigations

Astronomical Distance Determination in the Space Age: Secondary Distance Indicators

The formal division of the distance indicators into primary and secondary leads to difficulties in description of methods which can actually be used in two ways: with, and without the support of the other methods for scaling. Thus instead of concentrating on the scaling requirement we concentrate on all methods of distance determination to extragalactic sources which are designated, at least formally, to use for individual sources. Among those, the Supernovae Ia is clearly the leader due to its enormous success in determination of the expansion rate of the Universe. However, new methods are rapidly developing, and there is also a progress in more traditional methods. We give a general overview of the methods but we mostly concentrate on the most recent developments in each field, and future expectations. © 2018, The Author(s)

Accelarated immune ageing is associated with COVID-19 disease severity

Background The striking increase in COVID-19 severity in older adults provides a clear example of immunesenescence, the age-related remodelling of the immune system. To better characterise the association between convalescent immunesenescence and acute disease severity, we determined the immune phenotype of COVID-19 survivors and non-infected controls. Results We performed detailed immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from 103 COVID-19 survivors 3–5 months post recovery who were classified as having had severe (n = 56; age 53.12 ± 11.30 years), moderate (n = 32; age 52.28 ± 11.43 years) or mild (n = 15; age 49.67 ± 7.30 years) disease and compared with age and sex-matched healthy adults (n = 59; age 50.49 ± 10.68 years). We assessed a broad range of immune cell phenotypes to generate a composite score, IMM-AGE, to determine the degree of immune senescence. We found increased immunesenescence features in severe COVID-19 survivors compared to controls including: a reduced frequency and number of naïve CD4 and CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001); increased frequency of EMRA CD4 (p < 0.003) and CD8 T cells (p < 0.001); a higher frequency (p < 0.0001) and absolute numbers (p < 0.001) of CD28−ve CD57+ve senescent CD4 and CD8 T cells; higher frequency (p < 0.003) and absolute numbers (p < 0.02) of PD-1 expressing exhausted CD8 T cells; a two-fold increase in Th17 polarisation (p < 0.0001); higher frequency of memory B cells (p < 0.001) and increased frequency (p < 0.0001) and numbers (p < 0.001) of CD57+ve senescent NK cells. As a result, the IMM-AGE score was significantly higher in severe COVID-19 survivors than in controls (p < 0.001). Few differences were seen for those with moderate disease and none for mild disease. Regression analysis revealed the only pre-existing variable influencing the IMM-AGE score was South Asian ethnicity ( = 0.174, p = 0.043), with a major influence being disease severity ( = 0.188, p = 0.01). Conclusions Our analyses reveal a state of enhanced immune ageing in survivors of severe COVID-19 and suggest this could be related to SARS-Cov-2 infection. Our data support the rationale for trials of anti-immune ageing interventions for improving clinical outcomes in these patients with severe disease

Large-scale phenotyping of patients with long COVID post-hospitalization reveals mechanistic subtypes of disease

One in ten severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections result in prolonged symptoms termed long coronavirus disease (COVID), yet disease phenotypes and mechanisms are poorly understood1. Here we profiled 368 plasma proteins in 657 participants ≥3 months following hospitalization. Of these, 426 had at least one long COVID symptom and 233 had fully recovered. Elevated markers of myeloid inflammation and complement activation were associated with long COVID. IL-1R2, MATN2 and COLEC12 were associated with cardiorespiratory symptoms, fatigue and anxiety/depression; MATN2, CSF3 and C1QA were elevated in gastrointestinal symptoms and C1QA was elevated in cognitive impairment. Additional markers of alterations in nerve tissue repair (SPON-1 and NFASC) were elevated in those with cognitive impairment and SCG3, suggestive of brain–gut axis disturbance, was elevated in gastrointestinal symptoms. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) was persistently elevated in some individuals with long COVID, but virus was not detected in sputum. Analysis of inflammatory markers in nasal fluids showed no association with symptoms. Our study aimed to understand inflammatory processes that underlie long COVID and was not designed for biomarker discovery. Our findings suggest that specific inflammatory pathways related to tissue damage are implicated in subtypes of long COVID, which might be targeted in future therapeutic trials

Whole-genome sequencing reveals host factors underlying critical COVID-19

Critical COVID-19 is caused by immune-mediated inflammatory lung injury. Host genetic variation influences the development of illness requiring critical care1 or hospitalization2,3,4 after infection with SARS-CoV-2. The GenOMICC (Genetics of Mortality in Critical Care) study enables the comparison of genomes from individuals who are critically ill with those of population controls to find underlying disease mechanisms. Here we use whole-genome sequencing in 7,491 critically ill individuals compared with 48,400 controls to discover and replicate 23 independent variants that significantly predispose to critical COVID-19. We identify 16 new independent associations, including variants within genes that are involved in interferon signalling (IL10RB and PLSCR1), leucocyte differentiation (BCL11A) and blood-type antigen secretor status (FUT2). Using transcriptome-wide association and colocalization to infer the effect of gene expression on disease severity, we find evidence that implicates multiple genes—including reduced expression of a membrane flippase (ATP11A), and increased expression of a mucin (MUC1)—in critical disease. Mendelian randomization provides evidence in support of causal roles for myeloid cell adhesion molecules (SELE, ICAM5 and CD209) and the coagulation factor F8, all of which are potentially druggable targets. Our results are broadly consistent with a multi-component model of COVID-19 pathophysiology, in which at least two distinct mechanisms can predispose to life-threatening disease: failure to control viral replication; or an enhanced tendency towards pulmonary inflammation and intravascular coagulation. We show that comparison between cases of critical illness and population controls is highly efficient for the detection of therapeutically relevant mechanisms of disease