Major hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: Is preoperative portal occlusion an oncological risk factor?

Background: This study investigates oncological risks and benefits of portal occlusion (PO) in major resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods: Between 1995 and 2004, 107 patients were scheduled for major hepatectomy for CLM. Of these, 53 patients were selected for PO due to insufficient future liver remnant (FLR), and 54 patients had straightforward hepatectomy. Associations of clinicopathologic factors with resectability, and outcome after PO were analyzed. Results: 21 of 53 patients (39.6%) after PO were unresectable. These patients had a significant smaller volume of the FLR than the 32 resected patients after PO (P = .029). In total, 17 patients (80.9%) did not undergo resection due to cancer progression. Among these, 11 patients (52.4%) exhibited either a progression of known metastases located in the occluded lobes, or new metastases in the nonoccluded portion of the liver. In another 4 individuals (19%), the decision against resection resulted from insufficient hypertrophy of the FLR. Following major hepatectomy, the 5-year survival was 43.66%. Although there was a significantly higher rate of extended hepatectomies versus formal hepatectomies (P < .001), more bilobar distributed metastases versus unilobar manifestations (P = .015), and a smaller resection margin (P = .01) in patients who had PO, no adverse effect on mortality, morbidity, recurrence and survival was observed. Conclusion: Unresectability after PO is a major problem that warrants multidisciplinary improvements, and randomization to resection with or without PO remains ethically problematic. However, following adequate patient selection, PO may provide a significant survival benefit for patients with prior unresectable CLM

Computer-assisted surgery planning for complex liver resections: When is it helpful? A single-center experience over an 8-year period

Objective: The purpose of this study was (1) to compare 2-dimensional computed tomographic (2D-CT) and 3D-CT computer-assisted preoperative surgical planning, and (2) to define the indications for the latter method. Background: The determination of functional residual liver volumes and the imaging of intrahepatic anatomy are critical when planning complex liver resections. Patients and Methods: Prospective study of 202 consecutive patients who underwent high-risk procedures (extended right/left hepatectomies, central resections, polysegmentectomies, large atypical resections, repeated resections, and hepatectomies in the setting of abnormal liver parenchyma). Preoperative evaluation included 3D-CT computer-assisted surgical planning (3D-CASP) and conventional 2D-CT imaging. Endpoints of the study were (1) determination of resectability and (2) changes in operative strategy (resection modifications/extensions/intrahepatic vascular reconstructions). Results: Thirty-four of 202 cases were considered nonresectable on the basis of both 2D and 3D imaging results. In 56 (33%) instances, 3D-CASP either changed the 2D strategy (expansion of resection, n = 40; intrahepatic vascular reconstructions, n = 13) or provided an entirely different approach (n = 3). Eleven (5.4%) cases were considered unresectable at laparotomy on the basis of poor liver quality (n = 8) or unfeasible vascular reconstructions resulting in remnants too small to sustain physiologic function (n = 3). Significant differences between resectional 2D and functional 3D remnant liver volumes were observed in extended left hepatectomies and left trisectionectomies. Conclusions: 3D-CASP was particularly helpful in patients with unconventional resection planes and in those with central left tumors. Its main advantages were the individualized inflow/outflow virtual analyses and the accurate determination of safely perfused/drained retained liver volumes