96 research outputs found

    Management of infections pre- and post-liver transplantation: Report of an AISF consensus conference

    Get PDF
    The burden of infectious diseases both before and after liver transplantation is clearly attributable to the dysfunction of defensive mechanisms of the host, both as a result of cirrhosis, as well as the use of immunosuppressive agents. The present document represents the recommendations of an expert panel commended by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), on the prevention and management of infectious complications excluding hepatitis B, D, C, and HIV in the setting of liver transplantation. Due to a decreased response to vaccinations in cirrhosis as well as within the first six months after transplantation, the best timing for immunization is likely before transplant and early in the course of disease. Before transplantation, a vaccination panel including inactivated as well as live attenuated vaccines is recommended, while oral polio vaccine, Calmette-Guerin's bacillus, and Smallpox are contraindicated, whereas after transplantation, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. Before transplant, screening protocols should be divided into different levels according to the likelihood of infection, in order to reduce costs for the National Health Service. Recommended preoperative and postoperative prophylaxis varies according to the pathologic agent to which it is directed (bacterial vs. viral vs. fungal). Timing after transplantation greatly determines the most likely agent involved in post-transplant infections, and specific high-risk categories of patients have been identified that warrant closer surveillance. Clearly, specifically targeted treatment protocols are needed upon diagnosis of infections in both the pre- as well as the post-transplant scenarios, not without considering local microbiology and resistance patterns

    p53-paralog DNp73 oncogene is repressed by IFNα/STAT2 through the recruitment of the Ezh2 polycomb group transcriptional repressor

    Get PDF
    The DNp73 proteins act as trans-repressors of p53 and p73-dependent transcription and exert both anti-apoptotic activity and pro-proliferative activity. DNp73s are frequently up-regulated in a variety of human cancers, including human hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Increased levels of DNp73 proteins confer to HCC cells resistance to apoptosis and, irrespective to p53 status, a chemoresistant phenotype. Here, we show that interferon (IFN)α down-regulates DNp73 expression in primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) and HCC cell lines. IFNα has been used as pro-apoptotic agent in the treatment of malignancies and there is increasing evidence of IFNα effectiveness in HCC treatment and prevention of recurrence. The precise mechanisms by which class I IFNs exert their anti-proliferative and anti-tumor activity remain unclear. IFNα binding to its receptor activates multiple intracellular signaling cascades regulating the transcription of numerous direct target genes through the recruitment of a complex comprising of STAT1, STAT2 and IFN regulatory factor (IRF)9 to their promoters. We found that, in response to IFNα, the P2p73 promoter undergoes substantial chromatin remodeling. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) replace histone acetyl transferases. STAT2 is recruited onto the endogenous P2p73 promoter together with the polycomb group protein Ezh2, leading to increased H3K27 methylation and transcriptional repression. The reduction of DNp73 levels by IFNα is paralleled by an increased susceptibility to IFNα-triggered apoptosis of Huh7 hepatoma cells. Our results show, for the first time, that IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 recruitment may serve both in activating and repressing gene expression and identify the down-regulation of DNp73 as an additional mechanism to counteract the chemoresistance of liver cancer cells

    Decline of Prevalence of Resistance Associated Substitutions to NS3 and NS5A inhibitors at DAA-failure in Hepatitis C Virus in Italy over the years 2015 to 2018

    Get PDF
    Background: A minority of patients fail to eliminate HCV and resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) are commonly detected at failure of interferon-free DAA regimens. Material and methods: Within the Italian network VIRONET-C, the prevalence of NS3/NS5A/NS5B RASs was retrospectively evaluated in patients who failed an EASL recommended DAA-regimen in 2015-2018. NS3, NS5A and NS5B Sanger sequencing was performed using homemade protocols. The geno2pheno system was used to infer HCV-genotype/subtype and predict drug resistance. The changes in the prevalence of RASs over time were evaluated using the chi-square test for trend, predictors of RASs at failure were analysed by logistic regression. Results: We included 386 real-life HCV pts failed to recommended DAA regimens: 92% (271/294) Italians, 75% (286/384) males, median age was 56 years (IQR 52-61); 106 (28%) were treatment-experienced: 91 (86%) with IFN-based treatments, 26 (25%) with DAA-based regimens. Metavir fibrosis stage was F4 in 76% (245/322), 65% (240/369) had clinical cirrhosis. Patients with HIV and HBV coinfection were 10% (33/317) and 8% (6/72), respectively. HCV genotype (G) was G1b in 122 pts (32%), G3a 103 (27%), G1a 97 (25%), G4d 30 (8%), G2c 19 (5%), G3h 5 (1.3%), G4a 4 (1%) and 1 (0.3%) each for G3g, G4n/o/v. DAA regimens were: LDV/SOF in 115 (30%), DCV/SOF in 103 (27%), 3D in 83 (21%), EBR/GRZ in 32 (8%), VEL/SOF in 29 (7%), GLE/PIB in 18 (5%) and 2D in 6 (2%); ribavirin was administered in 123 (32%). Antiviral treatment was completed by 352 pts (91%), while 34 (9%) discontinued prematurely. The NS5A fasta-sequence was available for all pts, NS5B for 361 (94%), NS3 for 365 (95%). The prevalence of any RASs was 87%, namely 78/135 (58%) in NS3, 303/359 (85%) in NS5A, 114/286 (40%) in NS5B (Tab 1). The prevalence of any RASs significantly declined from 2015 to 2018 (100%, 13/13 vs 81%, 101/125, p=0.01): NS5A RASs from 100%, 13/13 to 76%, 76/100 (p<0.001), NS3 RASs from 88%, 7/8 to 44%, 28/63 (p=0.02), while NS5B RASs remained stable. Independent predictors of any RASs included liver cirrhosis/advanced fibrosis (AOR 3.72, CI 95% 1.51-9.17, p=0.004) and genotype (G2 vs G1a AOR 0.01, CI 95% 0.0-0.3, p<0.001; G3 vs G1a AOR 0.22, CI 95% 0.05-0.98, p<0.047; G4 vs G1a AOR 0.13, CI 95% 0.03-0.63, p<0.011), with a modest effect scored for past treatment (AOR 3.45, CI 95% 1.00-11.92, p=0.05), after adjusting for DAA regimen and year of genotype. Notably, full activity was predicted for GLE/PIB in 75.9% of cases and for at least two components of VEL/SOF/VOX in 59% of cases and no case with full-resistance to either regimen was found (Tab 2). Conclusions: Despite decreasing prevalence over the years, RASs remain a common signature at virological failure of DAA treatment, particularly in patients with the highest grade of liver fibrosis. Their distribution may vary according to genotype, so the identification of RASs after failure could play a crucial role in optimizing retreatment strategies

    Characteristics of hepatitis C virus resistance in an international cohort after a decade of direct-acting antivirals

    Full text link
    Background & Aims: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens provide a cure in >95% of patients with chronic HCV infection. However, in some patients in whom therapy fails, resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) can develop, limiting retreatment options and risking onward resistant virus transmission. In this study, we evaluated RAS prevalence and distribution, including novel NS5A RASs and clinical factors associated with RAS selection, among patients who experienced DAA treatment failure. Methods: SHARED is an international consortium of clinicians and scientists studying HCV drug resistance. HCV sequence linked metadata from 3,355 patients were collected from 22 countries. NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs in virologic failures, including novel NS5A substitutions, were examined. Associations of clinical and demographic characteristics with RAS selection were investigated. Results: The frequency of RASs increased from its natural prevalence following DAA exposure: 37% to 60% in NS3, 29% to 80% in NS5A, 15% to 22% in NS5B for sofosbuvir, and 24% to 37% in NS5B for dasabuvir. Among 730 virologic failures, most were treated with first-generation DAAs, 94% had drug resistance in ≄1 DAA class: 31% single-class resistance, 42% dual-class resistance (predominantly against protease and NS5A inhibitors), and 21% triple-class resistance. Distinct patterns containing ≄2 highly resistant RASs were common. New potential NS5A RASs and adaptive changes were identified in genotypes 1a, 3, and 4. Following DAA failure, RAS selection was more frequent in older people with cirrhosis and those infected with genotypes 1b and 4. Conclusions: Drug resistance in HCV is frequent after DAA treatment failure. Previously unrecognized substitutions continue to emerge and remain uncharacterized. Lay summary: Although direct-acting antiviral medications effectively cure hepatitis C in most patients, sometimes treatment selects for resistant viruses, causing antiviral drugs to be either ineffective or only partially effective. Multidrug resistance is common in patients for whom DAA treatment fails. Older patients and patients with advanced liver diseases are more likely to select drug-resistant viruses. Collective efforts from international communities and governments are needed to develop an optimal approach to managing drug resistance and preventing the transmission of resistant viruses

    L'Italia come modello per l'Europa e per il mondo nelle politiche sanitarie per il trattamento dell'epatite cronica da HCV

    Get PDF
    The World Health Organization foresees the elimination of HCV infection by 2030. In light of this and the curre nt, nearly worldwide, restriction in direct-acting agents (DAA) accessibility due to their high price, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two alternative DAA treatment policies: Policy 1 (universal): treat all patients, regardless of the fibrosis stage; Policy 2 (prioritized): treat only priori tized patients and delay treatment of the remaining patients until reaching stage F3. T he model was based on patient’s data from the PITER cohort. We demonstrated that extending HC V treatment of patients in any fibrosis stage improves health outcomes and is cost-effective
    • 

    corecore