76 research outputs found
âOtro Mundo Es Posibleâ: Tempering the Power of Immigration Law through Activism, Advocacy, and Action
âOtro Mundo Es Posibleâ: Tempering the Power of Immigration Law through Activism, Advocacy, and Action
âOtro Mundo Es Posibleâ: Tempering the Power of Immigration Law through Activism, Advocacy, and Action
Legacies and Origins of the 1980s US-Central American Sanctuary Movement
 This article re-examines the USâCentral American sanctuÂary movement of the 1980s. Our re-examination is motivÂated by two factors. First, with the passage of time it is posÂsible to discern the movementâs origins in ways that could not be fully articulated while it was ongoing. We are able to show how certain relationships between the movementâs North and Central American activists were celebrated, while others were obscured due to fear for Salvadoran immigrant activistsâ safety and concern about inadverÂtently undermining the movementâs legitimacy. Specifically, we draw attention to the movementâs transnational nature, noting that what made it so powerful was its origin as part of a broader effort by Salvadoran revolutionaries to mobilÂize North American society to oppose US support for the Salvadoran government. Ironically, to achieve this objective Salvadoran immigrant activists had to stay quiet, become invisible, and abstain from taking certain leadership roles, while embracing identities that may have implied weakÂness or passivity, such as ârefugeeâ or âvictim.â Second, the USâCentral American sanctuary movement provides powerful insight into future understandings of sanctuary as a concept and practice. The movementâs legacies extend beyond participantsâ stated goals, while the movementâs transnational political and organizational focus differentiÂates it from current sanctuary practices. Thus, re-examinÂing its origins and legacies suggests that apparent similarÂities in the form of sanctuary incidents may hide underlying differences and that current sanctuary practices may also eventually have unanticipated consequences.Cet article examine Ă nouveau le « sanctuary movement » aux Ătats-Unis et en AmĂ©rique centrale durant les annĂ©es 1980. Deux facteurs expliquent ce rĂ©examen. 1°, avec le passage du temps, il est possible de discerner les origines du mouvement qui ne pouvaient pas ĂȘtre entiĂšrement articulĂ©es alors quâil Ă©tait en cours. Nous sommes en mesure de montrer comment certaines relations entre activistes nord-amĂ©ricains et leurs contreparties centre-amĂ©ricaines ont Ă©tĂ© fĂȘtĂ©es, tandis que dâautres ont Ă©tĂ© occultĂ©es par crainte pour la sĂ©curitĂ© des militants salvadoriens pro immigration et par peur dâaccidentellement miner la lĂ©gitimitĂ© du mouvement. Plus prĂ©cisĂ©ment, nous attirons lâattention sur la nature transnationale du mouvement, soulignant que ce qui lâa rendu si puissant sont ses origines dans le cadre dâun effort plus large par les rĂ©volutionnaires salvadoriens en vue de mobiliser la sociĂ©tĂ© nord-amĂ©ricaine en opposition Ă lâappui des Ătats-Unis pour le pouvoir salvadorien. Ironie du sort, pour atteindre cet objectif les militants salvadoriens ont dĂ» rester muets, devenir invisibles et sâabstenir de prendre certains rĂŽles de leadership, tout en affichant des identitĂ©s, comme « rĂ©fugiĂ© » ou « victime », qui pouvaient implicitement signifier la faiblesse ou la passivitĂ©. 2°, le « sanctuary movement » des Ătats-Unis et de lâAmĂ©rique centrale donne un puissant aperçu de notre comprĂ©hension future de la notion de sanctuaire en tant que concept et pratique. Le legs du mouvement va au-delĂ des objectifs dĂ©clarĂ©s des participants, alors que son accent transnational, politique et organisationnel le diffĂ©rencie des pratiques actuelles. Ainsi, un rĂ©examen des origines du mouvementet de son hĂ©ritage suggĂšre que des similitudes apparentes sous la forme de cas de sanctuaire peuvent masquer des diffĂ©rences sous-jacentes et que les pratiques actuelles du sanctuaire peuvent aussi avoir des consĂ©quences Ă©ventuelles imprĂ©vues
Routine Exceptionality: The Plenary Power Doctrine, Immigrants, and the Indigenous Under U.S. Law
Navigating Liminal Legalities Along Pathways To Citizenship: Immigrant Vulnerability and the Role of Mediating Institutions
In this report, we summarize the findings of research funded by the Russell Sage Foundation and conducted in Southern California over the course of eighteen months between January 2014 and September 2015. This time period coincided with the announcement of and subsequent legal challenges to the DACA and DAPA program â a period characterized by extreme legal uncertainty over the availability and scope of these âExecutive Reliefâ programs. Drawing from 16 in-depth interviews with staff of 10 different immigrant serving organizations and 47 interviews with noncitizens in the Los Angeles and Orange County areas, we captured the on-the-ground challenges facing noncitizens and community based organizations as the scope and availability of Executive Relief was debated. In our research, we focused on the hardships and barriers to incorporation imposed by liminal legal status, the challenges faced by organizations mediating between their constituents and the state in periods of legal uncertainty, and the ways that uncertainty has reshaped the social, political and legal environment in which immigrant-serving organizations and their constituents interact. Our research is ongoing, but here we offer our preliminary findings for some of our research questions
Recommended from our members
Uncertainty and Educational Mismatch Schooling and Life Pursuits in Contexts of Illegalization
Recommended from our members
Suspension of Deportation Hearings and Measures of "Americanness"
Una forma de identificar las caracterĂsticas que, segĂșn las autoridades y la ley, el ciudadano ideal debe de tener es estudiar casos de inmigraciĂłn en corte. Por medio de observar la preparatiĂłn de tales casos, entrevistar a abogados y solicitantes, y asistir a audiencias en la corte federal de inmigraciĂłn en Los Angeles, se analiza estas caracterĂsticas. La investigatiĂłn se enfoca en los casos conocidos como "suspensiĂłn de deportatiĂłn". Para ganar, el solicitante tiene que haber vivido en los Estados Unidos por siete años, mostrar buen caracter moral y probar que deportation causarfa un dafio extremo al aplicante o a un pariente del aplicante. El anĂŁlisis indica que, aunque no se menciona la raza ni la etnicidad del solicitante, las caracterĂsticas preferidas se basan en la cultura anglosajĂłna, lo cual promueve un modelo anglosajĂłn del cuidadano ideal. Por eso, aĂșn cuando se ganan los casos, la ley impone requisitos que perjudican a ciertos sectores de la poblaciĂłn
- âŠ