10 research outputs found

    Cardiac tumours: clinical, echocardiographic and pathological features

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our paper was clinical and echocardiographic characterisation of patients with cardiac tumours and the evaluation of the surgery and tumour recurrence. METHOD: The first part of research was a retrospective investigation to identify cardiac tumours identification and to collect data from patients' records of the Messejana Hospital and Walter CantĂ­dio University Hospital, from 1981 to 2001. In this period, 19 cases of cardiac tumours were discovered. The patients were submitted to clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic re-evaluation from March to July 2002. RESULTS: Congestive symptoms and thoracic pain were the most frequent symptoms. The location in which most of the tumours were identified was left atrium. Among patients submitted to surgery, all of them had the tumour extracted from atrium. The most common histopathologic type was myxoma (78%). Surgical mortality was 14%. Tumour recurrence occurred in one patient. CONCLUSION: Cardiac tumours were more frequent in left atrium, benign tumours were more frequent than malignant tumours, and the most frequent histopathologic type was myxoma

    Data_Sheet_1_Data-driven, cross-disciplinary collaboration: lessons learned at the largest academic health center in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic.PDF

    No full text
    IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has prompted global research efforts to reduce infection impact, highlighting the potential of cross-disciplinary collaboration to enhance research quality and efficiency.MethodsAt the FMUSP-HC academic health system, we implemented innovative flow management routines for collecting, organizing and analyzing demographic data, COVID-related data and biological materials from over 4,500 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized from 2020 to 2022. This strategy was mainly planned in three areas: organizing a database with data from the hospitalizations; setting-up a multidisciplinary taskforce to conduct follow-up assessments after discharge; and organizing a biobank. Additionally, a COVID-19 curated collection was created within the institutional digital library of academic papers to map the research output.ResultsOver the course of the experience, the possible benefits and challenges of this type of research support approach were identified and discussed, leading to a set of recommended strategies to enhance collaboration within the research institution. Demographic and clinical data from COVID-19 hospitalizations were compiled in a database including adults and a minority of children and adolescents with laboratory confirmed COVID-19, covering 2020–2022, with approximately 350 fields per patient. To date, this database has been used in 16 published studies. Additionally, we assessed 700 adults 6 to 11 months after hospitalization through comprehensive, multidisciplinary in-person evaluations; this database, comprising around 2000 fields per subject, was used in 15 publications. Furthermore, thousands of blood samples collected during the acute phase and follow-up assessments remain stored for future investigations. To date, more than 3,700 aliquots have been used in ongoing research investigating various aspects of COVID-19. Lastly, the mapping of the overall research output revealed that between 2020 and 2022 our academic system produced 1,394 scientific articles on COVID-19.DiscussionResearch is a crucial component of an effective epidemic response, and the preparation process should include a well-defined plan for organizing and sharing resources. The initiatives described in the present paper were successful in our aim to foster large-scale research in our institution. Although a single model may not be appropriate for all contexts, cross-disciplinary collaboration and open data sharing should make health research systems more efficient to generate the best evidence.</p

    Genome of Rhodnius prolixus, an insect vector of Chagas disease, reveals unique adaptations to hematophagy and parasite infection

    No full text
    O artigo apresenta nas duas primeiras pĂĄginas nota de correção.Submitted by sandra infurna ([email protected]) on 2016-03-31T12:56:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 andre_torres_etal_IOC_2015.pdf: 1095119 bytes, checksum: df9054f950a043553746f4758ab01c35 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by sandra infurna ([email protected]) on 2016-03-31T15:33:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 andre_torres_etal_IOC_2015.pdf: 1095119 bytes, checksum: df9054f950a043553746f4758ab01c35 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-31T15:33:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 andre_torres_etal_IOC_2015.pdf: 1095119 bytes, checksum: df9054f950a043553746f4758ab01c35 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de QuĂ­mica. Departamento de BioquĂ­mica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Simon Fraser University. Biological Sciences. Burnaby, BC, Canada.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro Regional de Estudios Genomicos. La Plata, Argentina / Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de Buenos Aires. Centro de Bioinvestigaciones. Pergamino, Argentina.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Washington University School of Medicine. McDonnell Genome Institute. St. Louis, MO, USA.Washington University School of Medicine. McDonnell Genome Institute. St. Louis, MO, USA.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Biologia. Departamento de GenĂ©tica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidad de la RepĂșblica. Facultad de Ciencias. SecciĂłn GenĂ©tica Evolutiva. Montevideo, Uruguay.European Bioinformatics Institute. European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Welcome Trust Genome Campus. Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de QuĂ­mica. Departamento de BioquĂ­mica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.University of Notre Dame. Department of Biological Sciences. Notre Dame, IN.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Estadual Paulista. Departamento de Biologia. SĂŁo Paulo, SP, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas RenĂ© Rachou. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology. Centre for Genomic Regulation. Barcelona, Spain / Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Barcelona, Spain.Institut de Recherche pour le Development. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Laboratoire d`Evolution, GĂ©nome et SpĂ©ciation. Gif sur Yvette, France / UniversitĂ© Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.European Bioinformatics Institute. European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Welcome Trust Genome Campus. Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.UniversitĂ© François Rabelais. Centre National de la Recherche Sicentifique. Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l`Insect. Tours, France.UniversitĂ© Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias MĂ©dicas. Instituto de Investigaciones BioquĂ­micas de La Plata (INIBIOLP, CONICET). La Plata, Argentina.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Biologia. Departamento de GenĂ©tica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.University of Toronto. Department of Biology. Mississauga, ON, Canada.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas RenĂ© Rachou. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro Regional de Estudios Genomicos. La Plata, Argentina.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Entomology Branch. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Atlanta, GA, USA.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Biologia. Departamento de GenĂ©tica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas RenĂ© Rachou. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. Centro de BiociĂȘncias e Biotecnologia. LaboratĂłrio de QuĂ­mica e Função de ProteĂ­nas e PeptĂ­deos. Campos de Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil /Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Faculdade de FarmĂĄcia. Departamento de Biotecnologia FarmacĂȘutica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Entomology Branch. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Atlanta, GA, USA.The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology. Centre for Genomic Regulation. Barcelona, Spain / Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Barcelona, Spain.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.European Bioinformatics Institute. European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Welcome Trust Genome Campus. Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro Regional de Estudios Genomicos. La Plata, Argentina.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de QuĂ­mica. Departamento de BioquĂ­mica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto PolitĂ©cnico Nacional. Centro de InvestigaciĂłn y de Estudios Avanzados. oDepartment of Physiology, Biophysics and Neuroscience. Mexico City, Mexico.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de CiĂȘncias BiolĂłgicas. Departamento de Fisiologia e BIoquĂ­mica. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Florida International University. Department of Biological Sciences. Miami, FL, USA.Florida International University. Department of Biological Sciences. Miami, FL, USA.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de CiĂȘncias BiolĂłgicas e da SaĂșde. Departamento de Biologia Animal. SeropĂ©dica, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.University of Toronto. Department of Biology. Mississauga, ON, Canada.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro Regional de Estudios Genomicos. La Plata, Argentina.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro Regional de Estudios Genomicos. La Plata, Argentina.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias MĂ©dicas. Instituto de Investigaciones BioquĂ­micas de La Plata (INIBIOLP, CONICET). La Plata, Argentina.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Instituto de CiĂȘncias BiolĂłgicas. Departamento de Parasitologia. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.The John Hopkins University. Bloomberg School of Public Health. Deparment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology. Baltimore, MD, USA.Instituto Federal de Educação CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo. NĂșcleo de Doenças Infecciosas. VitĂłria, ES, Brasil.University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Department of Entomology. Urbana, IL, USA.Instituto Federal de Educação CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology. Centre for Genomic Regulation. Barcelona, Spain / Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Barcelona, Spain.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil./ Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal de UberlĂąndia. Faculdade de Computação. Instituto de GenĂ©tica e BioquĂ­mica. LaboratĂłrio de BioinformĂĄtica e AnĂĄlises Moleculares. UberlĂąndia, MG, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilUniversity of Santiago de Compostela. Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias. School of Medicine– Center for Resesarch in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases. Department of Physiology. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.Virginia Polytechnic Institute. Department of Biochemistry. Blacksburg, VA, USA.University of Cambridge. Deparment of Veterinary Medicine. Cambridge, United Kingdom.Simon Fraser University. Biological Sciences. Burnaby, BC, Canada.National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Section of Vector Biology. Rockville, MD, USA.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. Centro de BiociĂȘncias e Biotecnologia. LaboratĂłrio de QuĂ­mica e Função de ProteĂ­nas e PeptĂ­deos. Campos de Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilEuropean Bioinformatics Institute. European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Welcome Trust Genome Campus. Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Washington University School of Medicine. McDonnell Genome Institute. St. Louis, MO, USA.Washington University School of Medicine. McDonnell Genome Institute. St. Louis, MO, USA.University of Manitoba.Department of Biological Sciences. Winnipeg, MB, Canada.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Entomology Branch. Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Atlanta, GA, USA.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil..Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.University of Geneva Medical School. Department of Genetic Medicine and Development. Geneva 1211, Switzerland / Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. Geneva 1211, Switzerland / Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Cambridge, MA, USA / The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Cambridge, MA, USA.Washington University School of Medicine. McDonnell Genome Institute. St. Louis, MO, USA.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto LeĂŽnidas e Maria Deane. Grupo de Pesquisa em Ecologia de Doenças TransmissĂ­veis na AmazĂŽnia. AM, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal de UberlĂąndia. Faculdade de Computação. Instituto de GenĂ©tica e BioquĂ­mica. LaboratĂłrio de BioinformĂĄtica e AnĂĄlises Moleculares. UberlĂąndia, MG, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de CiĂȘncias BiomĂ©dicas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de CiĂȘncias BiolĂłgicas. Departamento de Parasitologia. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.National Institutes of Health. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Rockville, MD, USA.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de CiĂȘncias MĂ©dicas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de QuĂ­mica. Departamento de BioquĂ­mica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias MĂ©dicas. Instituto de Investigaciones BioquĂ­micas de La Plata (INIBIOLP, CONICET). La Plata, Argentina.Universidade Estadual Paulista. Departamento de Biologia. SĂŁo Paulo, SP, Brasil.European Bioinformatics Institute. European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Welcome Trust Genome Campus. Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro. Centro de BiociĂȘncias e Biotecnologia. LaboratĂłrio de QuĂ­mica e Função de ProteĂ­nas e PeptĂ­deos. Campos de Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.The John Hopkins University. Bloomberg School of Public Health. Deparment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology. Baltimore, MD, USA.University of Notre Dame. Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Notre Dame, IN.Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro Regional de Estudios Genomicos. La Plata, Argentina.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de CiĂȘncias BiolĂłgicas e da SaĂșde. Departamento de Biologia Animal. SeropĂ©dica, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de SaĂșde PĂșblica SĂ©rgio Arouca. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. NĂșcleo de Pesquisas EcolĂłgicas de MacaĂ©. MacaĂ©, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de CiĂȘncias BiomĂ©dicas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Washington University School of Medicine. McDonnell Genome Institute. St. Louis, MO, USA.Washington University School of Medicine. McDonnell Genome Institute. St. Louis, MO, USA.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de BioquĂ­mica MĂ©dica Leopoldo de Meis. Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CiĂȘncia e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Rhodnius prolixus not only has served as a model organism for the study of insect physiology, but also is a major vector of Chagas disease, an illness that affects approximately seven million people worldwide. We sequenced the genome of R. prolixus, generated assembled sequences covering 95% of the genome (∌702 Mb), including 15,456 putative protein-coding genes, and completed comprehensive genomic analyses of this obligate blood-feeding insect. Although immunedeficiency (IMD)-mediated immune responses were observed, R. prolixus putatively lacks key components of the IMD pathway, suggesting a reorganization of the canonical immune signaling network. Although both Toll and IMD effectors controlled intestinal microbiota, neither affected Trypanosoma cruzi, the causal agent of Chagas disease, implying the existence of evasion or tolerance mechanisms. R. prolixus has experienced an extensive loss of selenoprotein genes, with its repertoire reduced to only two proteins, one of which is a selenocysteine-based glutathione peroxidase, the first found in insects. The genome contained actively transcribed, horizontally transferred genes from Wolbachia sp., which showed evidence of codon use evolution toward the insect use pattern. Comparative protein analyses revealed many lineage-specific expansions and putative gene absences in R. prolixus, including tandem expansions of genes related to chemoreception, feeding, and digestion that possibly contributed to the evolution of a blood-feeding lifestyle. The genome assembly and these associated analyses provide critical information on the physiology and evolution of this important vector species and should be instrumental for the development of innovative disease control methods

    Genome of Rhodnius prolixus

    No full text

    Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

    Get PDF
    Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P &lt; 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)
    corecore