Genetic testing in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: why it matters in 2025

ADPKD is the most common monogenic cause of kidney failure globally and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. It is now recognized that it may result from both major and minor genes with associated differences in disease penetrance, symptom burden and clinical outcomes. Genetic testing is now readily available to discriminate between different genotypes and is being increasingly utilized for diagnostic and prognostic indications. In this short review, we summarize the reasons why testing should become part of standard care for ADPKD patients where available and highlight some current limitations and challenges to testing. Defining the genetic landscape in ADPKD for all ethnic groups will be key to the future development and deployment of individualized patient-centered management in this condition

Clinical spectrum, prognosis and estimated prevalence of DNAJB11-kidney disease

Monoallelic mutations of DNAJB11 were recently described in seven pedigrees with atypical clinical presentations of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. DNAJB11 encodes one of the main cofactors of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperon BiP, a heat-shock protein required for efficient protein folding and trafficking. Here we conducted an international collaborative study to better characterize the DNAJB11-associated phenotype. Thirteen different loss-of-function variants were identified in 20 new pedigrees (54 affected individuals) by targeted next-generation sequencing, whole-exome sequencing or whole-genome sequencing. Amongst the 77 patients (27 pedigrees) now in total reported, 32 reached end stage kidney disease (range, 55-89 years, median age 75); without a significant difference between males and females. While a majority of patients presented with non-enlarged polycystic kidneys, renal cysts were inconsistently identified in patients under age 45. Vascular phenotypes, including intracranial aneurysms, dilatation of the thoracic aorta and dissection of a carotid artery were present in four pedigrees. We accessed Genomics England 100,000 genomes project data, and identified pathogenic variants of DNAJB11 in nine of 3934 probands with various kidney and urinary tract disorders. The clinical diagnosis was cystic kidney disease for eight probands and nephrocalcinosis for one proband. No additional pathogenic variants likely explaining the kidney disease were identified. Using the publicly available GnomAD database, DNAJB11 genetic prevalence was calculated at 0.85/10.000 individuals. Thus, establishing a precise diagnosis in atypical cystic or interstitial kidney disease is crucial, with important implications in terms of follow-up, genetic counseling, prognostic evaluation, therapeutic management, and for selection of living kidney donors

KDIGO 2025 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation, management, and treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD):executive summary

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation, Management, and Treatment of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) represents the first KDIGO guideline on this subject. Its scope includes nomenclature, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevalence; kidney manifestations; chronic kidney disease (CKD) management and progression, kidney failure, and kidney replacement therapy; therapies to delay progression of kidney disease; polycystic liver disease; intracranial aneurysms and other extrarenal manifestations; lifestyle and psychosocial aspects; pregnancy and reproductive issues; pediatric issues; and approaches to the management of people with ADPKD. The guideline has been developed with patient partners, clinicians, and researchers around the world, with the goal to generate a useful resource for healthcare providers and patients by providing actionable recommendations. The development of this guideline followed an explicit process of evidence review and appraisal, based on a rigorous, formal systematic literature review. The strength of recommendations follows the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline also provides practice points serving to direct clinical care or activities relating to areas for which a systematic review was not conducted. Limitations of the evidence are discussed. Research recommendations to address gaps in knowledge, and implications for policy and payment, are provided. The guideline targets a broad audience of healthcare providers, people living with ADPKD, and stakeholders involved in the various aspects of ADPKD care.</p

KDIGO 2025 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation, management, and treatment of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD)

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation, Management, and Treatment of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) represents the first KDIGO guideline on this subject. The scope includes topics such as nomenclature, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevalence; kidney manifestations; chronic kidney disease management and progression, kidney failure, and kidney replacement therapy; therapies to delay progression of kidney disease; polycystic liver disease; intracranial aneurysms and other extrarenal manifestations; lifestyle and psychosocial aspects; pregnancy and reproductive issues; pediatric issues; and approaches to the management of people with ADPKD. The guideline has been developed with patient partners, healthcare providers, and researchers around the world, using robust methodology. The goal of the guideline is to generate a useful resource for healthcare providers and patients by providing actionable recommendations based on a rigorous, formal, systematic literature review. Another aim is to propose research recommendations for areas in which gaps in knowledge are present. The guideline targets a broad audience of healthcare providers treating ADPKD, while taking into account implications for policy and payment. The development of this guideline followed an explicit process of evidence review and appraisal. Treatment approaches and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies, appraisal of the certainty of the evidence, and the strength of recommendations following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline also provides useful infographics and practice points that serve to direct clinical care or activities for which a systematic review was not conducted. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, and areas for future research are presented

KDIGO 2025 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation, management, and treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): executive summary

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation, Management, and Treatment of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) represents the first KDIGO guideline on this subject. Its scope includes nomenclature, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevalence; kidney manifestations; chronic kidney disease (CKD) management and progression, kidney failure, and kidney replacement therapy; therapies to delay progression of kidney disease; polycystic liver disease; intracranial aneurysms and other extrarenal manifestations; lifestyle and psychosocial aspects; pregnancy and reproductive issues; pediatric issues; and approaches to the management of people with ADPKD. The guideline has been developed with patient partners, clinicians, and researchers around the world, with the goal to generate a useful resource for healthcare providers and patients by providing actionable recommendations. The development of this guideline followed an explicit process of evidence review and appraisal, based on a rigorous, formal systematic literature review. The strength of recommendations follows the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline also provides practice points serving to direct clinical care or activities relating to areas for which a systematic review was not conducted. Limitations of the evidence are discussed. Research recommendations to address gaps in knowledge, and implications for policy and payment, are provided. The guideline targets a broad audience of healthcare providers, people living with ADPKD, and stakeholders involved in the various aspects of ADPKD care

Nephrectomy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A consensus statement of the ERA Genes &amp; Kidney Working Group

\ua9 2025 The Author(s). A substantial number of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) undergo a nephrectomy, especially in workup for a kidney transplantation. Currently, there is no evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians about which patients should undergo nephrectomy, the optimal timing of this procedure, or the preferred surgical technique. This systematic review-based consensus statement aimed to answer important questions regarding nephrectomy in ADPKD. A literature review was performed and extended to a meta-analysis when possible. For this purpose, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to May 2024. Fifty-four publications, describing a total of 2391 procedures, were included. In addition, an exploratory questionnaire was sent to urologists, nephrologists, and transplant surgeons. These sources were used to develop practice points about indications, complications, mortality, and timing and technique of nephrectomy. In addition, data on renal embolization as a potential alternative to nephrectomy were explored and summarized. To reach consensus, practice points were defined and improved in three Delphi survey rounds by experts of the European Renal Association Working Group Genes &amp; Kidney and the European Association of Urology Section of Transplantation Urology. A total of 23 practice points/statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Among others, it was deemed that nephrectomy can be performed successfully for various indications and is an intermediate risk procedure with acceptable mortality and minimal impact on kidney graft function when performed before, in the same session or after transplantation. The complication rate seems to increase when the procedure is performed as an emergency. During the workup for transplantation, patient complaints should be assessed routinely by questionnaires to indicate symptom burden. Deciding on the need for nephrectomy and exploring potential alternatives such as kidney embolization should be a process of shared decision-making, preferably after multidisciplinary consultation

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: recent advances in clinical management

The first clinical descriptions of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) go back at least 500 years to the late 16th century. Advances in understanding disease presentation and pathophysiology have mirrored the progress of clinical medicine in anatomy, pathology, physiology, cell biology, and genetics. The identification of PKD1 and PKD2, the major genes mutated in ADPKD, has stimulated major advances, which in turn have led to the first approved drug for this disorder and a fresh reassessment of patient management in the 21st century. In this commentary, we consider how clinical management is likely to change in the coming decade