Comparative effectiveness of enalapril, lisinopril, and ramipril in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Background: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are recommended as first-line therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The comparative effectiveness of different ACEIs is not known. Methods and results: 4,723 out-patients with stable HFrEF prescribed either enalapril, lisinopril, or ramipril were identified from three registries in Norway, England, and Germany. In three separate matching procedures, patients were individually matched with respect to both dose equivalents and their respective propensity scores for ACEI treatment. During a follow-up of 21,939 patient-years, 360 (49.5%), 337 (52.4%), and 1,119 (33.4%) patients died amongst those prescribed enalapril, lisinopril, and ramipril, respectively. In univariable analysis of the general sample, enalapril and lisinopril were both associated with higher mortality as compared with ramipril treatment (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30-1.65, p < 0.001, and HR 1.38, CI 1.22-1.56, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients prescribed enalapril or lisinopril had similar mortality (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92-1.24, p = 0.41). However, there was no significant association between ACEI choice and all-cause mortality in any of the matched samples (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.25, p = 0.40; HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96-1.32, p = 0.16; and HR 1.08, HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93-1.31, p = 0.25 for enalapril vs. ramipril, lisinopril vs. ramipril, and enalapril vs. lisinopril, respectively). Results were confirmed in subgroup analyses with respect to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, cause of HFrEF, rhythm, and systolic blood pressure. Conclusion: Our results suggest that enalapril, lisinopril and ramipril are equally effective in the treatment of patients with HFrEF when given at equivalent doses

Bisoprolol compared with carvedilol and metoprolol succinate in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure

© 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Aims: Beta-blockers are recommended for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). However, it is disputed whether beta-blockers exert a class effect or whether there are differences in efficacy between agents. Methods and results: 6010 out-patients with stable CHF and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction prescribed either bisoprolol, carvedilol or metoprolol succinate were identified from three registries in Norway, England, and Germany. In three separate matching procedures, patients were individually matched with respect to both dose equivalents and the respective propensity scores for beta-blocker treatment. During a follow-up of 26,963 patient-years, 302 (29.5%), 637 (37.0%), and 1232 (37.7%) patients died amongst those prescribed bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol, respectively. In univariable analysis of the general sample, bisoprolol and carvedilol were both associated with lower mortality as compared with metoprolol succinate (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.91, p  <  0.01, and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.94, p  <  0.01, respectively). Patients prescribed bisoprolol or carvedilol had similar mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82–1.08, p = 0.37). However, there was no significant association between beta-blocker choice and all-cause mortality in any of the matched samples (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.76–1.06; p = 0.20; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93–1.31, p = 0.24; and HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.95–1.22, p = 0.26 for bisoprolol vs. carvedilol, bisoprolol vs. metoprolol succinate, and carvedilol vs. metoprolol succinate, respectively). Results were confirmed in a number of important subgroups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the three beta-blockers investigated have similar effects on mortality amongst patients with CHF

Prognostic Significance of Changes in Heart Rate Following Uptitration of Beta-Blockers in Patients with Sub-Optimally Treated Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Sinus Rhythm versus Atrial Fibrillation

Background: In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on sub-optimal doses of beta-blockers, it is conceivable that changes in heart rate following treatment intensification might be important regardless of underlying heart rhythm. We aimed to compare the prognostic significance of both achieved heart rate and change in heart rate following beta-blocker uptitration in patients with HFrEF either in sinus rhythm (SR) or atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the BIOSTAT-CHF study. We evaluated 1548 patients with HFrEF (mean age 67 years, 35% AF). Median follow-up was 21 months. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 9 months. The combined primary outcome was all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation stratified by heart rhythm and heart rate at baseline. Results: Despite similar changes in heart rate and beta-blocker dose, a decrease in heart rate at 9 months was associated with reduced incidence of the primary outcome in both SR and AF patients [HR per 10 bpm decrease—SR: 0.83 (0.75–0.91), p &lt; 0.001; AF: 0.89 (0.81–0.98), p = 0.018], whereas the relationship was less strong for achieved heart rate in AF [HR per 10 bpm higher—SR: 1.26 (1.10–1.46), p = 0.001; AF: 1.08 (0.94–1.23), p = 0.18]. Achieved heart rate at 9 months was only prognostically significant in AF patients with high baseline heart rates (p for interaction 0.017 vs. low). Conclusions: Following beta-blocker uptitration, both achieved and change in heart rate were prognostically significant regardless of starting heart rate in SR, however, they were only significant in AF patients with high baseline heart rate

Offshore telemedicine emergency service: a 1-year experience

&lt;jats:title&gt;Abstract&lt;/jats:title&gt;&lt;jats:sec&gt; &lt;jats:title&gt;Aim&lt;/jats:title&gt; &lt;jats:p&gt;Offshore wind energy is a fast growing market. Accordingly, a correspondingly large number of employees are working at the wind farms. Owing to the harsh operating conditions, accidents and medical emergencies occur there. The care of these patients poses special challenges. The aim of the investigation was to determine whether telemedical emergency care is technically possible on the North Sea, far away from any medical care.&lt;/jats:p&gt; &lt;/jats:sec&gt;&lt;jats:sec&gt; &lt;jats:title&gt;Subject and methods&lt;/jats:title&gt; &lt;jats:p&gt;We were able to establish a raw data supported telemedical integration with a rescue service monitor for transmission of ECG, blood pressure, saturation and other vital parameters to a telemedicine centre. As a first step, a satellite connection was set up on a supply ship for the transmission, which was then made available for data transfer via WLAN.&lt;/jats:p&gt; &lt;/jats:sec&gt;&lt;jats:sec&gt; &lt;jats:title&gt;Results&lt;/jats:title&gt; &lt;jats:p&gt;In this project, we were able to show in tests as well as in actual patient care that telemedical support of rescue service personnel on site using raw data transmission is also possible offshore on a supply ship. In this project, defined areas with WLAN coverage were necessary in which the transmission worked in 100% of cases.&lt;/jats:p&gt; &lt;/jats:sec&gt;&lt;jats:sec&gt; &lt;jats:title&gt;Conclusion&lt;/jats:title&gt; &lt;jats:p&gt;The care of emergencies in the area of offshore wind farms is an increasing problem, which can be sensibly treated with telemedical support. Technical possibilities can also be created on site in the North Sea. The further expansion of a communication network, for example, with LTE or 5G, is necessary to enable telemedical care independent of supply ships.&lt;/jats:p&gt; &lt;/jats:sec&gt